Skip to main content
Log in

Women Who Objectify Other Women: The Vicious Circle of Objectification?

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to test the extent to which women who self-objectify also objectify other women. One hundred thirty-two university students and their friends (64 women and 68 men) completed three questionnaires: (1) Noll and Fredrickson’s (1998) Self-Objectification Questionnaire, (2) a modified version of that questionnaire that measured individuals’ objectification of others, and (3) Slade, Dewey, Newton, and Brodie’s (1990) Body Cathexis scale. Women were more likely than men to self-objectify. Self-objectification was negatively related to body satisfaction for women but not for men. Both women and men objectified women more than they objectified men, although women’s objectification of other women was not significantly different than their objectification of men. Men objectified women more than women did, and women objectified men more than men did. Women were more likely to objectify other women than to objectify themselves. Higher self-objectification among both women and men was related to increased objectification of other women and men, but the relationships were stronger for women. Results indicate that women also objectify women, although not to the degree exhibited by men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beebe, D. W., Hombeck, G. N., Schober, A., Lane, M., & Rosa, K. (1996). Is body focus restricted to self-evaluation? Body focus in the evaluation of self and others. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 415–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Badmin, N., & Sneade, I. (2002). Body image dissatisfaction: Gender differences in eating attitudes, self-esteem, and reasons for exercise. Journal of Psychology, 136, 581–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary, D. R., & Sasse, D. K. (2001). Exploring the drive for muscularity in adolescent boys and girls. Journal of American College Health, 48, 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M. (2002). Feminist perspectives and objectified body consciousness. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice (pp. 55–62). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985). Dieting and binging: A causal analysis. American Psychologist, 40, 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (2002). Causes of eating disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 187–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. H., Caspar, R. C., & Larson, R. W. (1990). Weight and eating concerns among pre- and young adolescent boys and girls. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 11, 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieder, S., & Ruderman, A. (2001). Cognitive factors associated with binge and purge eating behaviours: The interaction of body dissatisfaction and body image importance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 801–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, P. F., & Jourard, S. M. (1953). The appraisal of body-cathexis: Body-cathexis and the self. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 17, 343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, P. D., Dewey, M. E., Newton, T., & Brodie, D. A. (1990). Development and preliminary validation of the Body Satisfaction Scale (BSS). Psychology and Health, 4, 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stice, E. (1994). Review of the evidence for a sociocultural model of bulimia nervosa and an exploration of the mechanisms of action. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 633–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelan, P., Mehaffey, S. J., & Tiggemann, M. (2003). Self-objectification and esteem in young women: The mediating role of exercise. Sex Roles, 48, 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Lynch, J. E. (2001). Body image across the lifespan in adult women: The role of self-objectification. Developmental Psychology, 37, 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, P., Thompson, J. K., Obremski-Brandon, K., & Coovert, M. (2002). The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance: A covariance structure modelling investigation testing the meditational role of appearance comparison. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 1007–1020.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Strelan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strelan, P., Hargreaves, D. Women Who Objectify Other Women: The Vicious Circle of Objectification?. Sex Roles 52, 707–712 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3

Key Words

Navigation