Cross-Cultural Reactions to Academic Sexual Harassment: Effects of Individualist vs. Collectivist Culture and Gender of Participants
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Male and female university students from the United States, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, Ecuador, Pakistan, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Turkey read a standardized scenario in which a male professor was accused of sexually harassing a female graduate student. Respondents from individualist countries judged the professor to be guilty of sexual harassment more often than did those from collectivist countries. Women rendered significantly more guilty judgments and assigned more severe punishments to the accused professor than did men. Implications for the individualist–collectivist classification system and cross-cultural research are discussed.
- Amnesty International. (1999). Annual Report on Taiwan (the Republic of China). Available from http://www.amnesty.org/ ailib/aireport/ar99/asa38.htm
- Berdahl, J. L., Magley, V. J., & Waldo, C. R. (1996). The sexual harassment of men? Exploring the concept with theory and data. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 527–547.
- Blumenthal, J. A. (1998). The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 33–57.
- Boninger, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Berent, M. K. (1995). Origins of attitude importance: Self-interest, social identification and value relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 61–80.
- Chan, D. K. S., Tang, C. S. K., & Chan, W. (1999). Sexual harassment: A prelhninary analysis of its effects on Hong Kong Chinese women in the workplace and academia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 661–672.
- Chia, R. C., Allred, L. J., & Jerzak, P. A. (1997). Attitudes toward women in Taiwan and China: Current status, problems, and suggestions for future research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 137–150.
- Chia, R. C., Moore, J. L., Lam, K. N., Chuang, C. J., & Cheng, B. S. (1995). Locus of control and gender roles: A comparison of Taiwanese and American students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 379–393.
- Crocker, D., & Kalemba, V. (1999). The incidence and impact of women’s experiences of sexual harassment in Canadian workplaces. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36, 541–558.
- DeSouza, E. R., Pryor, J. B., & Hutz, C. S. (1998). Reactions to sexual harassment charges between North Americans and Brazilians. Sex Roles, 39, 913–928.
- Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177.
- Goodman, L. A., Koss, M. P., & Russo, N. F. (1993). Violence against women: Physical and mental health effects: Part II. Research findings. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 2, 79–89.
- Graham, S., Werner, B., & Zucker, G. S. (1997). An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O. J. Simpson. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 331–346.
- Gregory, J. (1995). Sexual harassment: Making the best use of European law. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 2, 421–440.
- Gutek, B. A. (1995). How subjective is sexual harassment? An examination of rater effects. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 447–467.
- Harned, M. S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). Understanding a link between sexual harassment and eating disorder symptoms: A mediational analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1170–1181.
- Hong, C. (2004, August 21). Improvement needed: Eleven civic groups have joined forces to press for changes to laws on abuse and sexual harassment. Taipei Times, p. 2.
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Kamal, A., & Tariq, N. (1997). Sexual harassment experience questionnaire for workplaces of Pakistan: Development and validation. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 12, 1–20.
- Lenton, R., Smith, M. D., Fox, J., & Morra, N. (1999). Sexual harassment in public places: Experiences of Canadian women. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36, 517–540.
- Lott, B., Reilly, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1982). Sexual assault and harassment: A campus community case study. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 8, 296–319.
- Maatman, G. (2002). A global view of sexual harassment: Global human resource strategies. Available from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3495/is_7_ai_63846245
- Netherlands (2004). The country reports on human rights practices, 2003. Bureau of Democracy. Human Rights and Labor. Available from http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2003/27856.htm
- News24.com (2004, September 15). Turkey: “No” to adultery laws. Available from http://news24.com/News24/World/News/0,2-10-1462_1589480.htm
- Marlatt, G. A., & Tapert, S. F. (1993). Harm reduction: Reducing the risks of addictive behaviors. In J. S. Baer, G. A. Marlatt, & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Addictive behaviors across the lifespan (pp. 243–273). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. CrossRef
- Pryor, J. B., DeSouza, E. R., Fitness, J., Hutz, C., Kumpf, M., Lubbert, K., et al. (1997). Gender differences in the interpretation of social-sexual behavior: A cross-cultural perspective on sexual harassment. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 28, 509–534.
- Shupe, E. I., Cortina, L. M., Ramos, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Salisbury, J. (2002). The incidence and outcomes of sexual harassment among Hispanics and non-Hispanic White women: A comparison across levels of cultural affiliation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 298–308.
- Sigal, J., & Jabcobsen, H. (1999). A cross-cultural exploration of factors affecting reactions to sexual harassment: Attitudes and policies. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5, 760–785.
- Struch, N., Schwartz, S. H., & van der Kloot, W. A. (2002). Meaning of basic values for women and men: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 16–28.
- Tang, C. S., Yik, M. S. M., Cheung, F. M. C., Choi, P., & Au, K. (1996). Sexual harassment of Chinese college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 201–215.
- Timmerman, G., & Bajema, C. (1999). Sexual harassment in northwest Europe: A cross-cultural comparison. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 6, 419–439.
- Trommsdorf, G., & Iwawaki, S. (1989). Students’ perceptions of socialization and gender role in Japan and Germany. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 485–493.
- United Kingdom Home Office. (July, 2003). Ecuador: Asylum and appeals policy directorate. Available from www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind/en/home/laws_policy/country =y_ information/operation_guidance_ecuador.htm
- U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment of federal workers: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1995). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Trends, progress and continuing challenges. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- van Baarsen, B., & van der Pligt, J. (1998). Effect van sekse en werkstatus op de beoordeling van seksuele intimidatie op het werk: implicatie voor interventie enbeleid (Effect of gender and status on judgments of academic sexual harassment: Implications of policy and interventions). Sociale Interventie, 7, 20–25.
- Voronov, M., & Singer, J. A. (2002). The myth of individualism–collectivism: A critical review. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 461–480.
- Wasti, S. A., Bergman, M. E., Glomb, T. M., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Test of the cross-cultural generalizability of a model of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 766–778.
- Wasti, S. A., & Cortina, L. M. (2002). Coping in context: Sociocultural determinants of responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 394–405.
- Cross-Cultural Reactions to Academic Sexual Harassment: Effects of Individualist vs. Collectivist Culture and Gender of Participants
Volume 52, Issue 3-4 , pp 201-215
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, New Jersey
- 8. Psychology Department, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
- 2. Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland
- 3. Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey
- 4. Angeles University Foundation, Angeles City, the Philippines
- 5. VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 6. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 7. Modern Women’s Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan