Abstract
By exploring the meaning construction of Chinese citizenship stipulated in Chinese legislation and its interaction with social identities and human nature in the Chinese society, the present study investigates the nature and evolution of the conception of Chinese citizens through three selected cases from Chinese legislations, which illuminate that Chinese citizens are essentially persons with independent personalities defined by the rights and obligations stipulated in legislation. This conception is further strengthened by the entitlement to private properties and equality before law. This conception of Chinese citizenship is concrete and meaningful in the sense that it is underpinned with reference to social identities as person, people and personality in Chinese legislations. The reference of the conception to human being constitutes the essence of Chinese legislation. The meaning construction of Chinese citizenship is indeed a dynamic process engineered in the social and cultural process. The findings on the evolution of the construction of Chinese citizenship in Chinese legislation suggest that the formation of legal identity through legislation varies greatly in different countries. Nevertheless, the realization of the conception of citizenship will necessarily be backed up by social identities as person, people and personality, which will be further strengthened and expanded by the legitimating of private properties and equality before law. Citizenship is achieved by social participants through mediation engineered within the social and cultural process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cao, D. 2004. Chinese Law: A language perspective. Hants: Ashgate Publishing.
Cao, D. 2001. Fazhi vs/and/or rule of law? A semiotic venture into Chinese Law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 14: 223–247
Chen, A.H.Y. 2004. An introduction to the legal system of the People’s Republic of China. Hong Kong: LexisNexis.
Chen, J.F. 1999. Chinese Law-towards an understanding of Chinese Law, it nature and development. Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Chen, R.H. 1994. An issue to be reconsidered in the revision of criminal procedure law-differentiation and employment of Renfan, Xianyiren and Beigao. Legal Forum 4: 57–61.
Cheng, L., and K.K. Sin. 2009. Legal terms across communities: Divergence behind convergence in law. In Diversity, tolerance in social-legal contexts, ed. A. Wagner and V.K. Bhatia, 181–191. Surrey: Ashgate.
Child, B. 1992. Drafting legal documents: Principles and practices. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Company.
Clarke, D.C., ed. 2008. China’s legal system new developments, new challenges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J. 1999. Changing paradigms of citizenship and the exclusiveness of the demos. International Sociology 14(3): 245–268.
Danet, B. 1985. Legal discourse. In Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 1, ed. T.A. van Dijk, 273–291. London: Academic Press.
Faulks, K. 2000. Citizenship. London: Routledge.
Gadamer, H.G. 1995. Truth and method. New York: Continuum. (2nd revised edition translated and revised by Weinshermer, J. and Marshall, D. G.).
Gumperz, J.J., ed. 1982. Language and social identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Han, D.Y. 2008, October. The concept of fundamental rights in the context of PRC constitution law: The origin and evolution of fundamental rights in China. Paper presented at the Conference on Constitutionalism in China in the past 100 years and its future, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1987. Language as social semiotic—the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Hogg, M.A., and G.M. Vaughan. 2002. Social psychology. London: Prentice Hall.
Hu, J.G., and D.Y. Han. 2004. The constitution of People’s Republic of China. Beijing: Law Press.
Keith, R.C. 1994. China’s struggle for the rule of law. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium General 23.
Lin, F. 2000. Constitutional Law in China. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia.
Lin, L.F., and Y.M. Ji. 2005. The significances of human rights protection as the principle. Studies in Law and Business 4: 46–52.
Lubman, S.B. 1999. Bird in a cage- legal reform in China after Mao. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mellinkoff, D. 1990. The language of the law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Moore, S.F. 1971. Law and social change: The semi-autonomous field as an appropriate subject of study. Law and Society Review 7: 719–746.
Nuyen, A.T. 2005. On the confucian idea of citizenship. In Challenging citizenship-group membership and cultural identity in a global age, ed. Sor-hoon Tan, 169–183. Hampshire: Ashgate.
Peerenboom, R. 2002. China’s Long March towards the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, C.S. 1979. In Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Riley, P. 2007. Language, culture and identity: An ethnolinguistic perspective. London: Continuum.
Ruiter, D.W.P. 1999. Legislation and Legal Institutions. In Semiotics and legislation-jurisprudential, institutional and sociological perspectives, ed. H. van Schooten. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
Ruskola, T. 2002. Legal orientalism. Michigan Law Review 179 (101): 179–283.
Sin, K.K., and D. Roebuck. 1996. Language engineering for legal transplantation: Conceptual problems in creating common law Chinese. Language & Communication 16 (3): 235–254.
de Saussure, F. 1983. Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth.
Tajfel, H., and J. Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations, ed. W. G. Austin and S. Worchel. Monterey: Brooks-Cole. http://books.google.com/books?id=EzW6AAAACAAJ&dq=%22The+Social+Psychology+of+Intergroup+Relations%22. Retrieved on 21 March 2009.
Taylor, M.C. 1994. The politics of recognition. In Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition, ed. A. Gutmann, 25–73. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tully, J. 1995. Strange multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an age of diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J.C. 1982. Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Social identity and intergroup relations, ed. H. Tajfel, 15–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, A. 2008. The European cultural ecumene, legal pluralism. In Multicentrism as an emerging paradigm in legal theory, ed. Marek Zirk-Sadowski, et al., 104–125. London: Peter Lang.
Wang, G.G. 1999. Wang’s business law of China. Hong Kong: Butterworths Asia.
Xu, C.D. 1999. Constitution. Beijing: People’s University Press.
Yang, X.M., and Y.H. Zhou. 1999. China’s Danwei Tizhi. Beijing: China Economic Press.
Zhang, S.Y. 2002. A legal perspective on the structural evolution of Chinese society. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Zhao, J. 2005. On the constitutional basis of administrative law- recognition of the relationship between administrative law and the constitution. China Legal Science 2: 46–52.
Zhao, J. 2008. A reflection upon the Term People from a Constitutional Law Perspective. Legal Forum 118 (23): 54–59.
Zou, K.Y. 2006. China’s Legal Reform: Towards the Rule of Law. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ni, S., Cheng, L. & Sin, K.K. Who are Chinese Citizens? A Legislative Language Inquiry. Int J Semiot Law 23, 475–494 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9167-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9167-8