Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Peirce shows how he presupposes that a ‘most general science of semeiotic’ is entirely a matter of culture. Semiotics unfolds even beyond the debate on specific differences between nature and culture. The expression ‘semiotics of culture’ entails all components of a true pleonasm. Pierce finds his parallel in the philosophy of Hegel and both philosophers consider the close ties between expressiveness and consciousness as a specifically human, cultural and spiritual activity. That viewpoint leads not only to linguistic but also to other expressive phenomena, among which the body. Faces are perhaps the most outstanding bodily carriers of expression, so that Peirce’s analyses of Thirdness relate to the human face, not as a natural but as a cultural datum, in particular an artifice. A face-to-face relationship is embedded in a regulative discourse rather than an ethical appeal or other metaphysical dimensions. Three cases show various degrees of artificiality with different semiotic implications: Tilda Swinton’s appearance at the recent 2008 Oscar ceremony, the body art of Orlan and the first 2005 facial transplant of Isabelle Dinoire. The three do not only show how the human face is an artifice, but also how realities can appear to be fictitious within patterns of semiotic nature. Any sign can be a correlative to a fictitious world!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “The cyborg is a potent cultural icon of the late twentieth century.… The line between biological self and technological world was, in fact, never very firm … new technologies merely dramatize our oldest puzzles …”.

  2. “Cotary” is derived form Horace: “ergo fungar vice cotis”, “I will thus perform the function of a whetstone”, so that the sharpest conclusion can be drawn on Pragmatism.

  3. Notice a slightly different meaning of the word in English, and in particular in English legal language, where a fiction is “that the law promises what it cannot give” or that “layman and lawyer understand ‘offer’ and ‘acceptance’ differently”.

References

  1. Agamben, G. 1991. Language and death. The place of negativity. Minneapolis: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akman, K. 2006. Orlan and the work of art in the age of hyper-mechanical organic reproduction. International Journal of Baudrillard Studies 3 (1): 1. Also at www.ubishops.ca/baudrillardstudies/Vol3_1/akman.htm.

  3. Binswanger, L. 1942. Grundformen und Erkenntnis menschlichen Daseins. Zürich: M. Niehans Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broekman, Jan M. 1996. Intertwinements of law and medicine. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broekman, Jan M. 2007. Trading signs. Semiotic practices in law and medicine. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 20 (3): 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Broekman, Jan M., and H. Foox Michael. 2008. Binding words unfolding selves. New York: IIS Publishing Cie/iUniverse.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, A. 2003. Natural-born cyborgs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eco, U. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edelman, Gerald M., and G. Tononi. 2000. A universe of consciousness. How matter becomes imagination. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esser, J. 1969. Wesen und Wert der Rechtsfiktionen. Frankfurt/M: Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hegel, G.W.F. 1967. Jenaer Realphilosophie, Vols. I & II. Hamburg: F Meiner.

  12. Kevelson, R. 1988. The law as a system of signs. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuczynski, A. 2008. Extreme makeover. New York Times Style Magazine Fashion & Beauty, April.

  14. Levinas, E. 1961. Totalite et Infini. Essai sur L’extériorité. Series Phaenomenologica, Vol. 8. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff.

  15. Levinas, E. 1963. Difficile Liberté. Paris: Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levinas, E. 1972. Humanisme de l’Autre Homme. Montpellier: Fata Morgana.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levi-Strauss, Cl. 1962. La Pensée Sauvage. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peirce, Ch. S. 1998. Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  19. White, James B. 1973. The legal imagination. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan M. Broekman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broekman, J.M. Face to Face. Int J Semiot Law 22, 45–59 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-008-9094-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-008-9094-0

Keywords

Navigation