Abstract
The disciplinary structure of research on complex problems related to human activities is supported by the fundaments of the social, life, and hard sciences. In this work, we looked at the development of scientific research in the field of biofuels, as a sustainable source of energy, searching for references regarding its scientific roots and social relevance. Scientific communications on biofuels published between 1998 and 2007 were analyzed using a combination of bibliometric methods and text mining techniques. This field of research was characterized as interdisciplinary, with marked social relevance. Our bibliometric analysis shows that, in this research subject, 132 different, interacting fields of knowledge overlap, with dominance of Chemistry, Engineering and Agricultural Sciences. Through the use of text mining techniques, this field was configured into three groups of Disciplinary Dimensions. The first and most influential group includes the Agricultural Sciences, Social Sciences, and Environmental Sciences. The second group, which gives the field its technological basis, includes Chemistry, Engineering, and Microbiology. The third group includes disciplines with emerging involvement in the field of biofuels: Biology and Biochemistry, Animal and Plant Sciences, Molecular Biology and Genetics, Economics, Material Sciences, Nanosciences and Nanotechnology, Geosciences, Physics, Humanities, Multidisciplinary Sciences, Mathematics, and Computer Sciences. This study suggests that the first group of Disciplinary Dimensions conforms to the elements that socially validate the progress of research in the field of biofuels. This study also proposes a metric that can be used to measure the interdisciplinarity and the social framing of any other research field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aboela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., et al. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x.
Anex, R. (2003). Something new under the sun? Journal of Industrial Ecology. doi:10.1162/108819803323059334.
Braam, R. R., Wed, H. F., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1991a). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis 1: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4<233:AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-I.
Braam, R. R., Wed, H. F., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1991b). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis 2: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4<252:AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-G.
Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., & Hua, X. (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature18315.
CNPq. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia, Brasil (2013). Áreas do Conhecimento. http://memoria.cnpq.br/areasconhecimento/index.htm. Accessed July 30, 2013.
Cordeiro, A. D., & Bastos, R. C. (2006). Enhancing managing decisions with artificial intelligence. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 4(6), 429–435. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4472148. Accessed July 12, 2009.
Feldman, R., Dagan, I., & Hirsh, H. (1998). Mining text using keyword distributions. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. doi:10.1023/A:1008623632443.
Finlay, M. R. (2003). Old efforts at new uses: A brief history of chemurgy and the American search for biobased materials. Journal of Industrial Ecology. doi:10.1162/108819803323059389.
Fleurbaey, M., Bouin, O., Djelic, M. L., Kanbur, R., Laborde, C., Nowotny, H., et al. (2016). Policy: SOCIAL-progress panel seeks public comment. Nature. doi:10.1038/534616a.
Geigrich, J. (2003). Modern times and imperfect cycles. Journal of Industrial Ecology. doi:10.1162/108819803323059352.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., & De Moor, B. (2005a). Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Information Processing and Management. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.021.
Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., & Persson, O. (2005b). Combining full-text analysis and bibliometric indicators: A pilot study. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0208-0.
Global Research Council. (2016). 5th annual meeting of the global research council. https://erc.europa.eu/media-and-events/events/global-research-council-2016-annual-meeting. Accessed Sept 09, 2016.
IPSP. (2016). International panel on social progress. https://www.ipsp.org/. Accessed Sept 9, 2016.
Jensen, L. J., Saric, J., & Bork, P. (2006). Literature mining for the biologist: From information retrieval to biological discovery. Nature Reviews Genetics. doi:10.1038/nrg1768.
Klein, J. T., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Haberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R. W., & Welti, M. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology and society—an effective way for managing complexity. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
McMillan, G. S., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. L. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00030-X.
Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9.
Nature Editorial. (2016). Meet the challenge of interdisciplinary science: Problems of modern society demand collaborative research. Nature. doi:10.1038/534589b.
Nissani, M. (1997). Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. The Social Science Journal. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(97)90051-3.
Provalis Research. (2008). Wordstat: Content analysis module for SIMSTAT and QDA miner: User’s guide. Montreal, CA: Provalis Research.
Provalis Research. (2009). Wordstat v. 5.1. Montreal.
Reif, F. (1961). The competitive world of the pure scientist: The quest for prestige can cause conflict between the goals of science and the goals of the scientist. Science. doi:10.1126/science.134.3494.1957.
Reuters, T. (2006). National Science Indicators. Philadelphia.
Reuters, T. (2009a). Journal Citation Report. http://adminapps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?ID=U2O@M99fCGF44KNn1Nh. Accessed July 12, 2009.
Reuters, T. (2009b). Web of Science. http://apps.isiknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?highlighted_tab=WO. Accessed July 12, 2009.
Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0.
Salton, G., & Yang, C. S. (1973). On the specification of term values in automatic indexing. Journal of Documentation. doi:10.1108/eb026562.
Salton, G., Yang, C. S., & Yu, C. T. (1975). A theory of term importance in automatic text analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.4630260106.
Shah, P. K., Perez-Iratxeta, C., Bork, P., & Andrade, M. A. (2003). Information extraction from full text scientific articles: Where are the keywords? BMC Bioinformatics. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-4-20.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, USA: The Brookings Institution.
Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., & Moser, R. P. (2008). The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002.
Talamini, E., & Dewes, H. (2012). The macro-environment for liquid biofuels in Brazilian science and public policies. Science and Public Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/scr002.
USA. (1995). National Research Council. Committee on Criteria for Federal Support of Research and Development. Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology. Washington: National Academy Press. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45555/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK45555.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2016.
Wagner, C. S., Roessner, J. D., Bobb, K., Klein, J. T., Boyack, K. W., Keyton, J., et al. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004.
Yeh, A. S., Hirschman, L., & Morgan, A. A. (2003). Evaluation of text data mining for database curation: Lessons learned from the KDD Challenge Cup. Bioinformatics. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1046.
Acknowledgements
Supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS), Brazil. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC), Brazil, provided a doctoral fellowship to J.G. Online access to scientific journals was provided by Portal Periódicos—CAPES/MEC/Brazil.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomes, J., Dewes, H. Disciplinary dimensions and social relevance in the scientific communications on biofuels. Scientometrics 110, 1173–1189 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2233-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2233-6