Abstract
This Letter to the Editor proposes to use the CSS method for classifying ranking results (e.g. from university rankings) into meaningful groups.
References
Albarrán, P., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). References made and citations received by scientific articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 40–49. doi:10.1002/asi.21448.
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2016). An empirical look at the nature index. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23682.
Chi, P. S., & Glänzel, W. (2016). Do usage and scientific collaboration associate with citation impact? In I. Rafols, J. Molas-Gallart, E. Castro-Martínez, & R. Woolley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st international conference on science and technology indicators—Peripheries, frontiers and beyond (pp. 1223–1228). Valencia, Spain.
Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Thijs, B. (2016). Citation classes: A novel indicator base to classify scientific output. Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/sti/051%20-%20Blue%20Sky%20Biblio%20Submitted.pdf.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988). Characteristic Scores and Scales in assessing citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 14(2), 123–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bornmann, L., Glänzel, W. Applying the CSS method to bibliometric indicators used in (university) rankings. Scientometrics 110, 1077–1079 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2198-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2198-5