Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The evolution of female authorship in computing research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we have conducted a study that covers computer science publications from 1936 to 2010 in order to analyze the evolution of women in computing research. We have considered the computing conferences and journals that are available in the digital bibliography and library project database, which contains more than 1.5 million papers and more than 4 million authorships, corresponding to about 4,000 journals, conferences and workshops. We analyze the participation of women as the authors of publications, productivity and its relationship with the average research life of women in comparison to that of men, the gender distribution of conference and journal authorships depending on different computer science topics, and authors’ behavior as regards collaborating with one gender and/or the other. We also detail the method used to obtain and validate the data. The results of our study have led us to some interesting conclusions concerning various aspects of the evolution of female authorship in computing research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79(3), 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksnes, D. W., Rørstad, K., Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M (2013). Computing in the national curriculum: A guide for primary teachers, Naace & Computing at School.

  • Camp, T. (1997). The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavero, J. M., Vela, B., & Cáceres, P. (2014). Computer science research: More production, less productivity. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2103–2111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America (PNAS), 108(8), 3157–3162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 69(1–2), 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In P. Maehr & M. W. Steinkmap (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 217–258). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallivan, M. J. & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). Examining the relationship between gender and the research productivity of IS faculty. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS conference on computer personnel research ACM New York. NY, USA: ACM Press. pp. 103–113.

  • Gharibyan, H. & Gunsaulus, S. (2006). Gender gap in computer science does not exist in one former Soviet republic: Results of a study. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM ITiCSE conference on innovation and technology in computer science education. ACM New York. NY, USA: ACM Press. pp. 222–226.

  • Guzdial, M. (2012). U.S. Women in computing: Why isn’t it getting better? Blogs of the communications of the ACM. http://m.cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/149681-us-women-in-computing-why-isnt-it-getting-better/fulltext. Accessed 2014.

  • JCR. (2010). Journal citation reports ®. Philadelphia, PA: Thomson Reuters.

  • Ley, M. (2009). DBLP: some lessons learned. PVLDB, 2(2), 1493–1500.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, M., & Reuther, P. (2006). Maintaining an online bibliographical database: The problem of data quality. Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de l’Information RNTI-E-6. Cépaduès-Éditions, 2006, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Mauleón, E., & Bordons, M. (2006). Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of materials science. Scientometrics, 66(1), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath Cohoon, J., Nigai, S., & Kaye, J. (2011). Gender and computing conference papers. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 62–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Accessed through http://webcaspar.nsf.gov/, 2011.

  • Othman, M., & Latih, R. (2006). Women in computer science: No shortage here! Communications of the ACM, 49(6), 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papastergiou, M. (2008). Are computer science and information technology still masculine fields? High school students’ perceptions and career choices. Computers & Education, 51(2), 594–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SJR. (2010). SCImago journal & country rank. http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php.

  • Van Arensbergen, P., Van der Weijden, I., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity: A persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, 93(3), 857–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vela, B., Caceres, P., & Cavero, J. M. (2012). Participation of women in software engineering publications. Scientometrics, 93(3), 661–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, J., Eckmann, M., Goldenstein, S., & Anderson Rocha, A. (2013). How productivity and impact differ across computer science subareas. Communications of the ACM, 56(8), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63, 847–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been carried out in the framework of the following project: CoMobility (TIN2012-31104) financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Group VorTIC3, Computer Science and Statistics Department, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, C/Tulipán s/n, 28933, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain

    José María Cavero, Belén Vela, Paloma Cáceres, Carlos Cuesta & Almudena Sierra-Alonso

Authors
  1. José María Cavero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Belén Vela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paloma Cáceres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlos Cuesta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Almudena Sierra-Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belén Vela.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavero, J.M., Vela, B., Cáceres, P. et al. The evolution of female authorship in computing research. Scientometrics 103, 85–100 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1520-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1520-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation