Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of “Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy” (RPYS)

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the sub-field of philosophy of science using a new method developed in information science, Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy (RPYS). RPYS allows us to identify peak years in citations in a field, which promises to help scholars identify the key contributions to a field, and revolutionary discoveries in a field. We discovered that philosophy of science, a sub-field in the humanities, differs significantly from other fields examined with this method. Books play a more important role in philosophy of science than in the sciences. Further, Einstein’s famous 1905 papers created a citation peak in the philosophy of science literature. But rather than being a contribution to the philosophy of science, their importance lies in the fact that they are revolutionary contributions to physics with important implications for philosophy of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth, A., Marx, W., Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2014). On the origins and the historical roots of the Higgs boson research from a bibliometric perspective. The European Physical Journal Plus, 129(6), 1–13. doi:10.1140/epjp/i2014-14111-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. doi:10.1108/00220410810844150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2013). The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 84–88. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curd, M., & Psillos, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge companion to philosophy of science (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, bigscience. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch—Wissenschaft 48. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, P. (1949). Modern science and its philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1963). Citation indexes in sociological and historical research. American Documentation, 14(4), 289. doi:10.1002/asi.5090140405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1987). A different sort of great-books list: The 50 twentieth-century works most cited in the arts and humanities citation index, 1976–1983. Current Contents, 16, 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2001). From computational linguistics to algorithmic historiography (Lazerow Lecture). In Paper presented as part of a panel on “knowledge and language”: Building large-scale knowledge bases for intelligent applications, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I., & Istomin, V. S. (2003). Why do we need algorithmic historiography? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 400–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutting, G. (2009). What philosophers know: Case studies in recent analytic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., & Shlesinger, M. F. (2005). CAB: Citation-assisted background. Scientometrics, 62(2), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Eugene Garfield and algorithmic historiography: Co-words, co-authors, and journal names. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57(3), 248–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Marx, W., & Milojevic, S. (2014). Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and a relevant subset of (JASIST). Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 162–174. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, W., & Bornmann, L. (2014). Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): The legend of the Darwin finches. Scientometrics, 99(3), 839–844. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1200-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, W., Bornmann, L., Barth, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS). Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 751–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1965). On the shoulders of giants. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). On the history and systematics of sociological theory. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (Enlarged ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisch, G. A. (2005). How the Cold War transformed philosophy of science: To the icy slopes of logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (2006). The Berlin school of logical empiricism and its legacy. Erkenntnis, 64(3), 281–304.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2000). On growth, ageing, and fractal differentiation of science. Scientometrics, 47(2), 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica, 43(1–2), 99–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray, K. B. (2010). Philosophy of science: What are the key journals in the field? Erkenntnis, 72(3), 423–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (2000). Real Science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Brad Wray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wray, K.B., Bornmann, L. Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of “Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy” (RPYS). Scientometrics 102, 1987–1996 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1465-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1465-6

Keywords

Navigation