Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A bibliometric analysis on rural studies in human geography and related disciplines

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the world has experienced rapid urbanization, rural areas have always been and are still an important research field in human geography. This paper performed a bibliometric analysis on rural geography studies based on the peer-reviewed articles concerning rural geography published in the SSCI-listed journals from 1990 to 2012. Our analysis examines publication patterns (document types and publishing languages, article outputs and their categories, major journals and their publication, most productive authors, geographic distribution and international collaboration) and demonstrates the evolution of intellectual development of rural geography by studying highly cited papers and their citation networks and temporal evolution of keywords. Our research findings include: The article number has been increasing since the 1900s, and went through three phases, and the rural geography research is dominated in size by UK and USA. The USA is the most productive in rural geography, but the UK had more impact than other countries in the terms of the average citation of articles. Three distinct but loosely linked research streams of rural geography were identified and predominated by the UK rural geographers. The keywords frequencies evolved according to contexts of rural development and academic advances of human geography, but they were loosely and scattered since the rural researches in different regions or different systems faced with different problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig..4
Fig..5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowler, I. R., Bryant, C. R., & Cocklin, C. (2002). The sustainability of rural systems: geographical interpretations (Vol. 66). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl 1), 5303–5310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P. (2006). Conceptualizing rurality. Handbook of rural studies (pp. 18–28). London: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P., & Goodwin, M. (1992). Conceptualizing countryside change: From post-Fordism to rural structured coherence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 17, 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clout, H. D. (1976). Rural geography: an introductory survey. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, S. C., & Teixeira, A. A. (2010). The evolution of the cluster literature: shedding light on the regional studies–regional science debate. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1263–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2009). From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E., Paris, S., & Stock, W. G. (2006). HistCiteTM: A software tool for informetric analysis of citation linkage. Information Wissenschaft und Praxis, 57(8), 391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. (2005). Editorial: The eclipse of urban geography? Urban Geography, 26(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, R. A., & Joseph, A. E. (1997). Restructuring health and rural communities in New Zealand. Progress in Human Geography, 21(1), 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, M., & Craig, V. (2009). Constructing Rural Geographies in ACME. An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 8(2), 376–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P., Ward, N., & Clout, H. (2007). British rural geography: A disciplinary enterprise in changing times. Contemporary rural geographies–land property and resources in Britain: Essays in honour of Richard Munton (pp. 1–20). Tokyo: University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T. (1996). Rural geography trend report: the social and political bases of rural restructuring. Progress in Human Geography, 20(2), 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (2005). Rural geography: multifunctional rural geographies-reactionary or radical? Progress in Human Geography, 29(6), 773–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, M. (2003). Rural geography: a stock tally of 2002. Progress in Human Geography, 27(6), 779–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonts, M., Argent, N., & Plummer, P. (2012). Evolutionary perspectives on rural Australia. Geographical Research, 50(3), 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. (1994). Assessment of Research Performance with Bibliometric Methods. In Informations-und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften , Netherland, Springer (pp. 499-524).

  • Woods, M. (2005). Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (2009). Rural geography: blurring boundaries and making connections. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 849–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (2010). Performing rurality and practising rural geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 835–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (2012). Rural geography III: Rural futures and the future of rural geography. Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from several sources: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41130748, 41201116, and 41101165), Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (9142007), The Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions (CIT&TCD201404090), Tourism Young Expert Training Program of China National Tourism Administration (TYETP201304).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jia 11 Datun Road, Anwei, Beijing, 100101, China

    Jieyong Wang & Zhigao Liu

Authors
  1. Jieyong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhigao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhigao Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Liu, Z. A bibliometric analysis on rural studies in human geography and related disciplines. Scientometrics 101, 39–59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1388-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1388-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation