Skip to main content
Log in

Post-interdisciplinary frames of reference: exploring permeability and perceptions of disciplinarity in the social sciences

Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database contains records for approximately 2.3 million dissertations conferred at 1,490 research institutions across 66 countries. Despite the scope of the Dissertations and Theses database, no study has explicitly sought to validate the accuracy of the ProQuest SCs. This research examines the degree to which ProQuest SCs serve as proxies for disciplinarity, the relevance of doctoral work to doctoral graduates’ current work, and the permeability of disciplines from the perspective of the mismatch between SCs and disciplinarity. To examine these issues we conducted a survey of 2009–2010 doctoral graduates, cluster-sampled from Economics, Political Science, and Sociology ProQuest SCs. The results from the survey question the utility of traditional disciplinary labels and suggest that scholars may occupy a post-interdisciplinary space in which they move freely across disciplinary boundaries and identify with topics instead of disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.qualtrics.com.

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (1999). Department and discipline: Chicago sociology at one hundred. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2011). Price revisited: On the growth of dissertations in eight research fields. Scientometrics, 88, 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anseel, F., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., & Choragwicka, B. (2010). Response rates in organizational science, 1995–2008: A meta-analytic review and guidelines for survey researchers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, B. (1975). Imaginative participation: The career of an organizing concept in a multidisciplinary context. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, L. H., & Leksell, J. (2013). Longitudinal and cross-sectional study of registered nurses in Sweden who undertake a PhD showing that nurses continue to publish in English after their PhD but male nurses are more productive than female nurses. Scientometrics, 87(2), 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykema, J., Stevenson, J., Klein, L., Kim, Y., & Day, B. (2013). Effects of e-mailed versus mailed invitations and incentives on response rates, data quality, and costs in a web survey of university faculty. Social Science Computer Review, 31(3), 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1978). The Gordian Knot of journal coverage: Why we can’t put all the journals you want into the Current Contents edition you read. Current Contents, 13, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A. (2013). In defense of disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1993). Blurring, cracking, and crossing: Permeation and the fracturing of discipline. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 185–211). Charlottesville, London: The University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniffin, K. M., & Hanks, A. S. (2013). Boundary spanning in academia: Antecedents and near-term consequences of academic entrepreneurialism. Cornell Higher Education Research Institute (CHERI) Working Paper 158.

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics, 94(2), 589–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI Subject Categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Rotolo, D., & Rafols, I. (2012). Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject headings of PubMed. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2239–2253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, A. (2012). Personal correspondence to Cassidy Sugimoto via email on Oct 26, 2012.

  • Millar, M. M. (2013). Interdisciplinary research and the early career: The effect of interdisciplinary dissertation research on career placement and publication productivity of doctoral graduates in the sciences. Research Policy, 42(5), 1152–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, C., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2012). Using doctoral dissertations for a new understanding of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity. Poster. In Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Baltimore, MD.

  • Ni, C., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013a). Exploring interdisciplinarity in Economics through academic genealogy: An exploratory study. Poster. In Proceedings of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference.

  • Ni, C. & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013b). Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: A preliminary examination of sociology doctoral dissertations. In Poster iConference.

  • Ni, C., Sugimoto, C. R., & Jiang, J. (2013). Venue–author–coupling: A novel measure for identifying disciplines through social structures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, D. R., & Dillman, D. A. (1998). Development of a standard e-mail methodology: Results of an experiment. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(3), 378–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R. (2014). Academic genealogy. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: Metrics-based evaluation of research. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., Russell, T. G., & Bychowski, B. (2011). Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: An examination of dissertation networks in Library and Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1808–1828. doi:10.1002/asi.2156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (2000). What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different? In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity (pp. 46–65). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1984). The rise and decline of university disciplines in the sciences. In R. Jurkovich & J. H. P. Paelinck (Eds.), Problems in interdisciplinary studies: Issues in interdisciplinary studies (pp. 10–25). Aldershot, Hampshire: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying, T. Y., & Xiao, H. G. (2012). Knowledge linkage: A social network analysis of tourism dissertation subjects. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 36(4), 450–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Science of Science Innovation and Policy (SciSIP) program of the National Science Foundation (Grant no. 1158670).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy D. Bowman.

Appendix: Questionnaire

Appendix: Questionnaire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowman, T.D., Tsou, A., Ni, C. et al. Post-interdisciplinary frames of reference: exploring permeability and perceptions of disciplinarity in the social sciences. Scientometrics 101, 1695–1714 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1338-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1338-z

Keywords

Navigation