Skip to main content
Log in

Interdisciplinarity of nano research fields: a keyword mining approach

Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a keyword mining approach, this paper explores the interdisciplinary and integrative dynamics in five nano research fields. We argue that the general trend of integration in nano research fields is converging in the long run, although the degree of this convergence depends greatly on the indicators one chooses. Our results show that nano technologies applied in the five studied nano fields become more diverse over time. One field learns more and more related technologies from others. The publication and citation analysis also proves that nano technology has developed to a relatively mature stage and has become a standardized and codified technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. It can also be denoted by A∩B∩C∩D∩E.

  2. For instance, each published article from Web of Science has at least one subject category, indicating a general area of science or the social sciences.

  3. The two recent year (2008 and 2009) are not included in the citation analysis.

  4. Though hospitals are often attached to universities or research institute, they are private in many countries. Therefore we have hospital as one separate category instead of being incorporated into academic.

References

  • Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70(3), 859–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Schubert, A., & Zsindely, S. (1997). Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38(2), 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In Edquist, C. (ed.) 1997 Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London and Washington: Pinter/Cassell Academic, pp. 130-156

  • Huang, C., Notten, A., & Rasters, N. (2010). Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics, 58(3), 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igami, M. & Saka, A. (2007). Capturing the evolving nature of science, the development of new scientific indicators and the mapping of science. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2007/1.

  • van Leeuwen, T., & Tijssen, R. (2000). Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation, 9(3), 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveridge, D., Dewick, P., & Randles, S. (2008). Converging technologies at the nanoscale: The making of a new world? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., & Persson, O. (1998). Nanotechnology—Interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42(2), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, N., Huang, C., Notten, A., & Wang, L. (2009). Report on Benchmarking Global Nanotechnology Scientific Research, 1998–2007. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolau, D. (2004). Challenges and opportunities for nanotechnology policies: An Australian perspective. Nanotechnology Law and Business, 1(4), 446–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough sets. International Journal of Information and Computer Sciences, 11(5), 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Chubin, D. E. (1985). An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8(3–4), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(5), 1023–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2007). How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics, 70(3), 633–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M. C. (2005). The emergence and policy implications of converging new technologies integrated from the nano-scale. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7, 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M. C. (2008). Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, P., Ruiz, M.E., Kraft, D.H. & Chen, J. (2001). Vocabulary mining for information retrieval: rough sets and fuzzy sets. Information Processing and Management, 37(1), 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomov, D. T., & Mutafov, H. G. (1996). Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics, 37(2), 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Notten, A. (2010). Benchmark Report Nano-technology and Nano-science, 1998–2008. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lili Wang.

Appendix

Appendix

See Appendix Table 6.

Table 6 Cited publications cross five fields (1998–2007): non-standardized percentages

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, L., Notten, A. & Surpatean, A. Interdisciplinarity of nano research fields: a keyword mining approach. Scientometrics 94, 877–892 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0856-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0856-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation