Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Key factors and considerations in the assessment of international collaboration: a case study for Austria and six countries

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This bibliometric study on the collaboration of Austria and six target countries (Slovenia, Hungary, Czech Republic, Denmark, Switzerland and Israel) reveals the importance of differentiation between the bilateral and multilateral contingents in the assessment of international scientific collaboration. For this purpose a “degree of bilaterality” (DB) and a “citation degree of bilaterality” (CDB) are introduced. In our findings the DB and the CDB have values lower than 1/3 and 1/5, respectively. Therefore, the total collaboration is mostly shaped in its volume and impact by the multilateral contingent. Regarding the impact estimation of the collaboration publication output, a multi-faceted approach was used. It is recommended to separately analyze the following three aspects: the un-cited range, the average range and the excellence range. Considering different country specific parameters the total number of publications and citations were resized for each type of collaboration and the results discussed. Only a very weak correlation between ‘times cited’ and the number of affiliations or authors was observed at publication level. Neither the number of authors or affiliations determines impact increase. Rather internationalisation and cooperation seem to be the crucial factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J., Gurney, K. A., & Marshall S. (2007a). Patterns of international collaboration for the UK and leading partners (Summary report). A report commissioned by the UK Office of Science and Innovation (http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file40396.pdf).

  • Adams, J., Gurney, K. A., & Marshall, S. (2007b). Profiling citation impact: A new methodology. Scientometrics, 72(2), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration, (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Miguel, S., Benavent-Pérez, M., & Moya-Anegon, F. (2011). International scientific collaboration between Latin American countries in Medicine. REDC, in press.

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., & Sebastian, J. (1999). Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 44(3), 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorraiz, J., Reimann, R., & Gumpenberger, C. (2011), The importance of bilateral and multilateral differentiation in the assessment of international collaboration—A case study for Austria and six countries. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011—The 13th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, Durban, South Africa, 4–7 July 2011, pp. 236–248.

  • Hsiang Liao, C. (2011). How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks. Scientometrics, 86(3), 747–761. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0309-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J., & Huang, D. (2011). Correlation between impact and collaboration. Scientometrics, 86(2), 317–324. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0265-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key figures. (2007). Towards a European research area: Science, technology and innovation/European Commission, Directorate-General for Research (2007); Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. ISBN 9789279034503 9279034502, http://cordis.europa.eu/documents/documentlibrary/97946551EN6.pdf.

  • Lee, K., Brownstein, J. S., Mills, R. G., & Kohane, I. S. (2010). Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration? PLoS ONE, 5(12), e14279. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0014279.

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17, 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2010). CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group’s publication oeuvre. Journal of informetrics, 4(3), 436–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O. (2010). Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics, 83(2), 397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckling, F. (2007). A contest between nations; or how far is Austrian research behind that of the world leaders? An analysis on the competitiveness of Austria’s scientific research in the natural and social sciences. Vienna: FWF. Accessed October 2007, from http://www.fwf.ac.at/de/downloads/pdf/contest_between_nations.pdf.

  • Roberts, G. (2006). International partnerships of research excellence: UK–USA academic collaboration. University of Oxford, http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/archive/uk-us-academic-collaboration/GarethRobertsIPoREx.pdf.

  • Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Strength and weakness of national science systems. A bibliometric analysis through cooperation patterns. Scientometrics, 79(2), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is the by-product of a data analysis performed in cooperation with and supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF). The authors thank Ambros Wernisch and Steve Reding for their support with compiling the data, and Prof. Christoph Kratky and Dr. Falk Reckling for their interesting suggestions.

An extended version of a paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban (South Africa), 4–7 July 2011 (Gorraiz et al. 2011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bibliometrics Department, Vienna University Library, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Juan Gorraiz & Christian Gumpenberger

  2. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel Straße 3, 1180, Vienna, Austria

    Ralph Reimann

Authors
  1. Juan Gorraiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ralph Reimann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian Gumpenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Gorraiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorraiz, J., Reimann, R. & Gumpenberger, C. Key factors and considerations in the assessment of international collaboration: a case study for Austria and six countries. Scientometrics 91, 417–433 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0579-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0579-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation