Skip to main content
Log in

International mobility of researchers in robotics, computer vision and electron devices: A quantitative and comparative analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated author information in scientific articles by approximately 7,000 researchers for a quantitative analysis of researchers’ international mobility. From top journals, we traced the movements of more than 2,200 researchers in the research domains of robotics, computer vision and electron devices. We categorized countries’ characteristics for the balance between the inflow and the outflow of researchers moving internationally. Flow patterns of international mobility confirm that the United States, China and India exhibit the greatest global flows of researchers, with Singapore and Hong Kong attracting remarkable numbers of researchers from other countries. International mobility focusing on institutions reveals that universities in Singapore receive as many foreign researchers as do research universities in the United States. Furthermore, firms and international collaborative research institutes act as alternative receivers to the universities in the electron devices research domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hong Kong is a special administrative region in China. Since the peculiarity is noteworthy, we isolated Hong Kong from China in this analysis.

References

  • Cañibano, C., Otamendi, J., & Andújar, I. (2008). Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis: The case of the Ramóny Cajal programme in Spain. Research Evaluation, 17(1), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CD, O. E. (2008). The global competition for talent: Mobility of the highly skilled. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • CD, O. E. (2010a). Education at a glance 2010: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • CD, O. E. (2010b). International migration outlook 2010. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commander, S., KAngasniermi, M., Winter, L. A. (2003). The brain drain: Curse or boon? IZA Discussion Paper, No. 809.

  • Davenport, S. (2004). Panic and panacea: Brain drain and science and technology human capital policy. Research Policy, 33(4), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349–3471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J., Fier, H., & Grimpe, C. (2011). International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research Policy, 40, 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippo, D. D., Casado, E. S., & Gómez, S. C. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the study of mobility and scientific performance: A case study of a Spanish university. Research Evaluation, 18(3), 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B. (2006). People flows in globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa, T., Shirakawa, N., & Okuwada, K. (2011). Quantitative analysis of collaborative and mobility networks. Scientometrics, 87(3), 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2002). Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding. Research Evaluation, 11(1), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grip, A, Fouarge, D. and Sauermann, J. (2010). What affects international migration of European science and engineering graduates?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(5), 2010.

  • Hunter, R. S., Oswald, A. J., & Charlton, B. G. (2009). The elite brain drain. Economic Journal, 119(538), F231–F251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzelt, A. (2008). The inflow of highly skilled workers into Hungary: A by-product of FDI. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 422–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2004). Global estimates of high-level brain drain and deficit. Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 18(9), 936–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2003). Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help? Scientometrics, 57(2), 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2005). Migration currents among the scientific elite. Minerva, 43(4), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahroum, S. (2005). The international policies of brain gain. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17(2), 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangematin, V. (2000). PhD job market: Professional trajectories and incentives during the PhD. Research Policy, 29(6), 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özden, C., & Schiff, M. (2005). International migration remittances and the brain drain. New York: The World Bank and Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regets, M. C. (2007). Research issues in the international migration of highly skilled workers: A perspective with data from the United States, working paper, SRS 07-203, NSF.

  • Sandström, U. (2009). Combing curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: Mobility, gender and research performance. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. L. (2002). Brain circulation: How high skill immigration makes everyone better off. The Brookings Review, 20(1), 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. L. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SF, N. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu, R., Ho, K.-C., & Yeoh, B. (2010). Emerging education hubs: The case of Singapore. Higher Education, 61(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solimano, A. (2008). The international mobility of talent: types causes and development impact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (2001). Exceptional contribution to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated. Population Research and Policy Review, 20(1–2), 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorn, K. & Holm-Nielsen, L. B. (2006). International mobility of researchers and scientist: Policy options for tuing a drain into gain, No RP2006/83, Working Papers, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takao Furukawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furukawa, T., Shirakawa, N., Okuwada, K. et al. International mobility of researchers in robotics, computer vision and electron devices: A quantitative and comparative analysis. Scientometrics 91, 185–202 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0545-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0545-0

Keywords

Navigation