Skip to main content
Log in

Re-examine the relationship between patents and Tobin’s q

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the relationship between patents and Tobin’s q is confusing, this paper utilizes panel threshold regression model to re-examine the relationship between patent counts/sales and Tobin’s q. This study finds out patent citations/sales has a single threshold effect on the relationship between patent counts/sales and Tobin’s q in the US pharmaceutical industry. The single threshold value of patent citations/sales is 328.81, and it divides the value of patent citations/sales into two regimes: the first regime (patent citations/sale ≦ 328.81) and the second regime (patent citations/sale > 328.81). The results indicate that patent counts/sales positively affect Tobin’s q in the two regimes. In addition, this study demonstrates that the extent of the positive effect of patent counts/sales on Tobin’s q is different. This study verifies that patent citations/sales moderates the relationship between patent counts/sales and Tobin’s q. Once patent citations/sales is below the threshold value, the extent of the positive relationship between patent counts/sales and Tobin’s q is the most. Therefore, this study finds out that the first regime is optimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhat, V. N. (2005). Patent term extension strategies in the pharmaceutical industry. Pharmaceuticals Policy & Law, 6(1), 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Patents, real options and firm performance. Economic Journal, 112(478), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies, 66(228), 529–554.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, D., & Rogers, M. (2001). Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Economic Record, 77(239), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K. (1991). Competitor technology intelligence in German companies. Industrial Marketing Management, 20(2), 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. G., & Svenson, R. A. (1988). Measuring R&D productivity. Research Technology Management, 31(4), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinal, L. B., & Hatfield, D. E. (2000). Internal knowledge generation: The research laboratory and innovative productivity in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3–4), 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. S. (1993). Consistency and limiting distribution of the least squares estimator of a threshold autoregressive model. The Annals of Statistics, 21, 520–533.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. S., & Tsay, R. S. (1998). Limiting properties of the least squares estimator of a continuous threshold autoregressive model. Biometrika, 85, 413–426.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S. (2011). Using patent analysis to explore corporate growth. Scientometrics, 88(2), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2009). Using neural network to analyze the influence of the patent performance upon the market value of the US pharmaceutical companies. Scientometrics, 80(3), 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010a). Analyzing the nonlinear effects of firm size, profitability, and employee productivity on patent citations of the US pharmaceutical companies by using artificial neural network. Scientometrics, 82(1), 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010b). Exploring the nonlinear effects of patent citations, patent share, and relative patent position on market value in the US pharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010c). The nonlinear nature of the relationships between the patent traits and corporate performance. Scientometrics, 82(1), 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010d). The relationship between a firm’s patent quality and its market value—the case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chen, B.-Y. (2011). Utilizing patent analysis to explore the cooperative competition relationship of the two LED companies: Nichia and Osram. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1988). Patents, priority and imitation or, the economics of races and waiting games. Economic Journal, 98(389), 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. B. (1977). Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika, 64, 247–254.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguet, E., & MacGarvie, M. (2005). How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 14(5), 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (1998). Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(4), 279–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (1999). Evaluation of dynamic technological developments by means of patent data. In K. Brockhoff, A. K. Chakrabarti, & J. Hauschildt (Eds.), The dynamics of innovation: Strategic and managerial implications. Berlin: Springer Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2001). Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: Evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level. Research Policy, 30(1), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25(3), 233–242.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli, P. (2003). Global pharmaceutical industry: Intellectual wealth and asset protection. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(3/4), 284–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. G. (1982). Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review, 72(3), 514–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1981). Market value, R&D, and patents. Economics Letters, 7, 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1987). R&D and productivity: Measurement issues and econometric results. Science, 237(4810), 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., Hall, B. H., & Pakes, A. (1991). R&D, patents, and market value revisited: Is there a second (technological opportunity) factor? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1(3), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8), 1365–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H. (1993). The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980’s. American Economic Review, 83(2), 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. E. (1996). Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica, 64, 413–430.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345–368.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschey, M. (1982). Intangible capital aspects of advertising and R&D expenditures. Journal of Industrial Economics, 30(4), 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschey, M., & Richardson, V. J. (2001). Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschey, M., & Richardson, V. J. (2004). Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors? Journal of Empirical Finance, 11(1), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market values. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E. J. (1987). Research expenditures and the discovery of new drugs. Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(1), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal, 114(495), 441–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. G., Lee, J. D., Song, Y. I., & Lee, S. J. (2007). An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data model: The case of KIST. Scientometrics, 70(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business, 54(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1986). Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science, 32(2), 173–181.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., & Wagner, S. (1981). Imitation costs and patents: An empirical study. Economic Journal, 91(364), 907–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossinghoff, G. J., & Bembelles, T. (1996). The importance of intellectual property protection to the American research-intensive pharmaceutical industry. Columbia Journal of World Business, 31(1), 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European Countries during the post-1950 period. Economic Journal, 96(384), 1052–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, D. (2002). Patenting activity as an indicator of revenue growth: Five industries. Patent Journal, 1(7), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, H. (1983). Threshold models in non-linear time series analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag Press.

  • Tancer, R. S. (1995). Trends in worldwide intellectual property protection: The case of the pharmaceutical patent. The International Executive, 37(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen, O., Stoneman, P., & Bosworth, D. (2002). Innovation and the market value of UK Firms, 1989–1995. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(1), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (2001). Innovation in Israel 1968–1997: A comparative analysis using patent data. Research Policy, 30(3), 363–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.-H., & Chen, J.-R. (2003). Innovation and market value in newly-industrialized countries: The case of Taiwanese electronics firms. Asian Economic Journal, 17(2), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Shan Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, YS., Shih, CY. Re-examine the relationship between patents and Tobin’s q. Scientometrics 89, 781–794 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0471-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0471-1

Keywords

Navigation