China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper examines the rapid growth of China in the field of nanotechnology and the rise of collaboration between China and the US in this emerging domain. Chinese scientific papers in nanotechnology are analyzed to indicate overall trends, leading fields and the most prolific institutions. Patterns of China–US nanotechnology paper co-authorship are examined over the period 1990–2009, with an analysis of how these patterns have changed over time. The paper combines bibliometric analysis and science mapping. We find rapid development in the number of China–US co-authored nanotechnology papers as well as structural changes in array of collaborative nanotechnology sub-fields. Implications for both China and the US of this evolving relationship are discussed.
- Adams, J., & Wilsdon, J. (2006). The new geography of science: UK research and international collaboration, Evidence Ltd. Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Demos_Evidence_China.pdf.
- Atkinson, R. C., & Blanpied, W. A. (2008). Research universities: Core of the US science and technology system. Technology in Society, 30, 30–48. CrossRef
- Basu, A., & Aggarwal, R. (2001). International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance. Scientometrics, 52(3), 379–394. CrossRef
- Berger, M. (2007). Debunking the trillion dollar nanotechnology market size hype. Nanowerk. Retrieved January 5, 2011, from http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=1792.php.
- Bhushan, B. (2007). Introduction to Nanotechnology. In B. Bhushan (Ed.), Springer handbook of nanotechnology (pp. 1–10). Springer: New York. CrossRef
- Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M., Sooryamoorthy, R., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D. B. S., & Shrum, W. (2005). Collaboration paradox: Scientific productivity, the Internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 755–785. CrossRef
- European Commission. (2003). The Third European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 2003. Towards a knowledge-based economy. Brussels: European Commission.
- Georghiou, L. (1998). Global cooperation in research. Research Policy, 27(6), 611–626. CrossRef
- Huang, C., Notten, A., & Rasters, N. (2010). Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: A review of social science studies and search strategies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 145–172.
- Hwang, K. (2008). International collaboration in multilayered center-periphery in the globalization of science and technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(1), 101–133. CrossRef
- Jin, B., Suttmeier, R. P., Wang, Z., Cao, C., Wang, D., & Zhou, Q. (2007). Sino–U.S. science collaboration: An analysis in bibliometrics. Journal of Shanxi University (Natural Science Edition), 30(2), 295–302.
- Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2007). Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 565–601. CrossRef
- Lee, L. L., Chan, C. K., Ngiam, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2006). Nanotechnology patent landscape 2006. NANO, 1(2), 101–113. CrossRef
- Lin, M.-W., & Zhang, J. (2007). Language trends in nanoscience and technology: The case of Chinese-language publications. Scientometrics, 70, 555–564. CrossRef
- Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science Technology Human Values, 17(1), 101–126. CrossRef
- Lux Research. (2005). Ranking the Nations: Nanotech’s Shifting Global Leaders. New York: Lux Research, Inc.
- Lux Research (2006). The Nanotech Report (4th edition): Investment Overview and Market Research for Nanotechnology. New York: Lux Research Inc.
- Lux Research. (2009). The recession’s ripple effect on nanotech. State of the Market Report. New York: Lux Research Inc.
- Melkers, J., & Kiopa, A. (2010). The Social capital of global ties in science: The added value of international collaboration. Review of Policy Research, 27(4), 389–414. CrossRef
- National Science Board. (2010). Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 10-01).
- NNI. (2010). The NNI Supplement to the President’s 2011 Budget. Retrieved from www.nano.gov/NNI_2011_budget_supplement.pdf.
- OECD. (2008). OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: China 2008. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
- Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science? Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 534–536. CrossRef
- Porter, A., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728. CrossRef
- Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287. CrossRef
- Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887. CrossRef
- Raj, B., Bawa, S. R., Maebius, S. B., Flynn, T., & Wei, C. (2005). Protecting new ideas and inventions in nanomedicine with patents. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine, 1(2), 150–158. CrossRef
- Rejeski, D. (2009). Nanotechnology and consumer products. CPSC FY2010 Agenda and Priorities, Testimony before the Consumer Products Safety Commission, August 18, 2009. Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
- Roco, M. C. (2005). International perspective on government nanotechnology funding in 2005. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(6), 707–712. CrossRef
- Roco, M. C. (2010). The long view of nanotechnology development: The National Nanotechnology Initiative at ten years. In M. C. Roco, C. Mirkin, & M. Hersam (Eds.), Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020. New York: Springer.
- Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2005). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(1), 1–13. CrossRef
- Royle, J., Coles, L., Williams, D., & Evans, P. (2007). Publishing in international journals—An examination of trends in Chinese co-authorship. Scientometrics, 71(1), 59–86. CrossRef
- Rubinstein, E. (2000). China’s leader commits to global science and scientific exchange. Science, 16, 1950.
- Sargent, J. F. (2010). Nanotechnology: A policy primer. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
- Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2009). From lab to market: Strategies and issues in the commercialization of nanotechnology in China. Journal of Asian Business Management, 8(4), 461–489. CrossRef
- Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2010). Follow the money. What was the impact of the nanotechnology funding boom of the past ten years? Nature, 469, 627–628. CrossRef
- Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2010). United States. In D. Guston & J. G. Golson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society. London: Sage Publications.
- Suttmeier, R. P. (2008). State, self-organization, and identity in the building of Sino–U.S. cooperation in science and technology. Asian Perspective, 32(1), 5–31.
- Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). Regional development and interregional collaboration in the growth of nanotechnology research in China. Scientometrics, 86, 299–315. CrossRef
- Tang, L., & Walsh, J. (2010). Bibliometric fingerprints: Name disambiguation based on approximate structure equivalence of cognitive maps. Scientometrics, 84, 763–784. CrossRef
- Tang, L., Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2010). China. In D. Guston & J. G. Golson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society. London: Sage Publications.
- Velloso, A., Lannes, D., & de Meis, L. (2004). Concentration of science in Brazilian governmental universities. Scientometrics, 61(2), 207–220. CrossRef
- Wagner, C. S. (2008). The new invisible college: Science for development. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
- Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618. CrossRef
- Youtie, J., Porter, A., Shapira, P., Tang, L., & Benn, T. (2011). The use of environmental, health and safety research in nanotechnology research. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 11, 158–166. CrossRef
- Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Porter, A. (2008). National nanotechnology publications and citations. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(6), 981–986. CrossRef
- Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104. CrossRef
- China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics
Volume 88, Issue 1 , pp 1-16
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- China–US scientific collaboration
- Bibliometric analysis
- Science mapping
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
- 2. School of Public Economics and Administration, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 777 Guoding Road, 200433, Shanghai, P.R. China
- 3. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK