Abstract
I propose the index \(\hbar\) (“hbar”), defined as the number of papers of an individual that have citation count larger than or equal to the \(\hbar\) of all coauthors of each paper, as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher that takes into account the effect of multiple authorship. The bar is higher for \(\hbar.\)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics 3, 273–289, and references therein.
Anderson, T., Hankin, K., & Killworth, P. (2008). Beyond the durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics 76, 577–588.
Antonakis, J., & Lalive, R. (2008). Quantifying scholarly impact: IQp versus the Hirsch h. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 956–969.
Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics 68, 179–189.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 1381–1385, and references therein.
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 830–837.
Burrell, Q. L. (2007). On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin’s A-index. Journal of Informetrics 1, 170–177.
Chai, J. C., Hua, P. H., Rousseau, R., & Wan, J. K. (2008). Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index. In H. Kretschmer & F. Havemann (Eds.), Proceedings of WIS 2008, Berlin (Vol. 64, 71 pp.)
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 69, 131–152.
Egghe, L. (2008). Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 1608–1616.
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2008). An h-index weighted by citation impact. Information Processiong and Management 44, 770–780
Fersht, A. (2009). The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor. PNAS 106, 6883–6884.
Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index. Journal of Informetrics 3, 64–71.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individuals scientific research output. PNAS 102, 16569–16572.
Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power? PNAS 104, 19193–19198.
Jin, B. (2007). The AR-index: Complementing the h-index. ISSI Newsletter 3, 6–6.
Jin, B. H., Liang, L. M., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin 52, 855–863.
Komulski, M. (2006). A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index. ISSI Newsletter 2, 4–6.
Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. PNAS 105, 17268–17272.
Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. (2008). A proposal for a dynamic h-type index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 1853–1855.
Ruane, F., & Tol, R. (2008). Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland. Scientometrics 75, 395–405.
Schreiber, M. (2009). A case study of the modified Hirsch index h m accounting for multiple coauthors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 1274–1282
Sekercioglu, C. H. (2008). Quantifying coauthor contributions. Science 322, 371–371.
Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics 72, 253–280
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics 2, 263–271.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics 67, 491–502.
Zhang, C. T. (2009). A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank. EMBO Reports 10, 416–417.
Acknowledgement
The author is grateful to Dr. Prabhat Koner for stimulating correspondence.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirsch, J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics 85, 741–754 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0193-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0193-9