Abstract
This paper examines the common contentions that the collective aging of tenured academic staff has negative effects on research performance of universities due to (a) negative effects of aging in itself, and (b) to a lack of newcomers who could revitalise the research. Data on academic staff and research at Norwegian universities over two decades have been used to examine these contentions. While older staff published less than their younger colleagues two decades ago, no differences in productivity are found today. Furthermore, during this period, a large increase in the number of post-doctoral fellows and PhD students has taken place, compensating for the aging of tenured staff.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, P. D., Stewart, J. A. (1974), Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage, American Sociological Review, 39: 596–606.
Cole, S. (1979), Age and scientific performance, American Journal of Sociology, 84: 958–977.
Cole, J., Cole, S. (1973), Social Stratification in Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Creamer, E. G. (1998), Assessing Faculty Publication Productivity, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 26, No. 2, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
Diamond, A. M. (1984), An economic model of the life-cycle research productivity of scientists, Scientometrics, 6: 189–196.
Kyvik, S. (1990), Age and scientific productivity. Differences between fields of learning, Higher Education, 19: 37–55.
Kyvik, S. (1991), Productivity in Academia. Scientific Publishing at Norwegian Universities, Norwegian University Press, Oslo.
Kyvik, S. (2003), Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980–2000, Scientometrics, 58: 35–48.
Kyvik, S., Teigen, M. (1996), Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21: 54–71.
Merton, R. (1973), The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Mittermeir, R., Knorr, K. D. (1979), Scientific productivity and accumulative advantage: A thesis reassessed in the light of international data, R&D Management, 9: 235–239.
Olsen, T. B., Kyvik, S., Hovdhaugen, E. (2005), The promotion to full professor — through competition or by individual competence? Tertiary Education and Administration, 11: 299–316.
Price, R. L., Thompson, P. H., Dalton, G. W. (1975), A longitudinal study of technological obsolescence, Research Management, 18: 22–28.
Riley, M. W., Johnson, M., Foner, A. (1972), Aging and Society — Volume Three: A Sociology of Age Stratification, Russel Sage Foundation, New York.
Schaie, K. W. (1975). Age changes in adult intelligence. In: D. S. Woodruff, J. E. Birren (Eds), Aging, Scientific Perspectives and Social Issues. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York.
Stephan, P., Levin, S. (1992), Striking the Mother Lode in Science. The Importance of Age, Place, and Time, Oxford University Press, New York.
Stephan, P., Levin, S. (1993), Age and the Nobel Prize revisited, Scientometrics, 28: 387–399.
Zuckerman, H., Merton, R. K. (1972), Age, aging, and age structure in science. In: M. W. Riley, M. Johnson, A. Foner (Eds), Aging and Society — Volume Three: A Sociology of Age Stratification. Russel Sage Foundation, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kyvik, S., Olsen, T.B. Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities?. Scientometrics 76, 439–455 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1767-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1767-z