Skip to main content
Log in

Proof of a conjecture of Moed and Garfield on authoritative references and extension to non-authoritative references

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a recent paper [H. F. MOED, E. GARFIELD: In basic science the percentage of “authoritative”references decreases as bibliographies become shorter. Scientometrics 60 (3) (2004) 295-303] the authors show, experimentally, the validity of the statement in the title of their paper. In this paper we give a general informetric proof of it, under certain natural conditions. The proof is given both in the discrete and the continuous setting. An easy corollary of this result is that the fraction of non-authoritative references increases as bibliographies become shorter. This finding is supported by a set of data of the journal Information Processing and Management (2002 + 2003) with respect to the fraction of conference proceedings articles in reference lists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egghe, L., Ravichandra Rao, I. & Bhusan Sahoo, B. Proof of a conjecture of Moed and Garfield on authoritative references and extension to non-authoritative references. Scientometrics 66, 537–549 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0039-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0039-7

Keywords

Navigation