References
Agyeman, J., & Carmin, J. (2011). Introduction: Environmental injustice beyond borders. In J. Carmin & J. Agyeman (Eds.), Environmental inequalities beyond borders: Local perspectives on global injustices (pp. 1–15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bergandi, D. (2014). Environnement, éthique et politique: les limites d’une démocratie inaboutie et leurs conséquences néfastes sur la protection de la nature. Éthique publique [En ligne],. doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.1364.
Birnbacher, D. (2004). Limits to sustainability in nature conservation. In M. Oksanen & J. Pietarinen (Eds.), Philosophy and biodiversity (pp. 180–195). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bisschop, L. (2014). How e-waste challenges environmental governance. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(2), 81–95.
Callicott, J. B. (1989). In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Callicott, J. B. (2002). The pragmatic power and promise of theoretical environmental ethics. Environmental Values, 11, 3–25.
Clément, P. (2006). Didactic transposition and KVP model: Conceptions as interactions between scientific knowledge, values and social practices. In ESERA Summer School (pp. 9–18). Braga: University of Minho.
Clements, F. E. (1916/2000). Plant succession: An analysis of the development of vegetation. In D. R. Keller & F. B. Golley (Eds.), The philosophy of ecology: from science to synthesis (pp. 35–41). Athens, London: University of Georgia Press.
Coll, C., Pozo, J. I., Sarabia, B., & Valls, E. (1992). Los contenidos en la reforma: enseñanza y aprendizaje de conceptos, procedimientos y actitudes. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Santillana S.A.
Comte-Sponville, A. (2002). A small treatise on the great virtues: The uses of philosophy in everyday life. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Dewey, J. (1930/1984) Conduct and experience. In C. Murchison (Eds.), Psychologies of 1930 (pp. 409–422), Worcester: Clark University Press. Repr. Boydston, J. A. (Eds.) The later works of John Dewey 1925–1953, v. 5, 1929–1930 (pp. 218–235), Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. F. (1949/1989) Knowing and the known. Boston: The Beacon Press. Repr. Boydston, J. A. (ed.) The later works of John Dewey 1925–1953, v. 16, 1949–1952 (pp. 1–294). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Frankel, O. H. (1974). Genetic conservation: Our evolutionary responsibility. Genetics, 78, 53–65.
Frankel, O. H., & Soulé, M. E. (1981). Conservation and evolution. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of indignation. Boulder CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Grove, N. J., & Zwi, A. B. (2006). Our health and theirs: Forced migration, othering, and public health. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1931–1942.
Hodson, D. (2004). Going beyond STS: Towards a curriculum for sociopolitical action. Science Education Review, 3(1), 2–7.
Kahn, R. (2010). Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, and planetary crisis: The ecopedagogy movement. New York: Peter Lang.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1999). Politiques de la nature: comment faire entrer les sciences en de´mocratie. Paris: Editions La Decouverte.
Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lovelock, J. E. (1988/1995). The ages of Gaia: a biography of our living earth. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Moore, G. E. (1903/2000) Principia Ethica. (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Plato. (1977). Timeu. Trad. Carlos Alberto Nunes. Belém: Universidade Federal do Pará.
Preston, C. J. (2005). The promise and threat of nanotechnology. Can environmental ethics guide us? HYLE—International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 11(1), 19–44.
Proctor, L. M. (2011). The human microbiome project in 2011 and beyond. Cell Host and Microbe, 10, 287–291.
Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43. Repr Quine, W. V. O. (1953) From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Regan, T. (1994). The case for animal rights: A decade’s passing. In R. T. Hull (Ed.), A quarter century of value inquiry: Presidential addresses of the American Society for Value Inquiry (pp. 439–459). Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Editions Rodopi.
Regan, T. (2003a). Empty cages: Facing the challenge of animal rights. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Regan, T. (2003b). Animal rights, human wrongs: An introduction to moral philosophy. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Sagoff, M. (2004). Price, principle, and the environment. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schiemann, G. (2005). Nanotechnology and nature. On two criteria for understanding their relationship. HYLE—International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 11(1), 77–95.
Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York: Avon Books.
Solli, A., Bach, F., & Akerman, B. (2014). Learning to argue as a biotechnologist: Disprivileging opposition to genetically modified food. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9, 1–23.
Weis, L. (1995). Identity formation and the process of ‘‘othering’’: Unravelling sexual threads. Educational Foundations, 9(1), 17–33.
WWF. (2014). Living planet report 2014: Species and spaces, people and places. Gland, VD, Switzerland: World Wide Fund for Nature.
Zabala, A. (1998). A prática educativa: como ensinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357–377.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nunes-Neto, N.F. The Environmental Crisis as a Good Case for an Intellectual and Practical Integration Between Philosophy and Science. Sci & Educ 24, 1285–1299 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9766-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9766-6