Date: 18 Oct 2012
Observation, Inference, and Imagination: Elements of Edgar Allan Poe’s Philosophy of Science
- Axel Gelfert
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Edgar Allan Poe’s standing as a literary figure, who drew on (and sometimes dabbled in) the scientific debates of his time, makes him an intriguing character for any exploration of the historical interrelationship between science, literature and philosophy. His sprawling ‘prose-poem’ Eureka (1848), in particular, has sometimes been scrutinized for anticipations of later scientific developments. By contrast, the present paper argues that it should be understood as a contribution to the raging debates about scientific methodology at the time. This methodological interest, which is echoed in Poe’s ‘tales of ratiocination’, gives rise to a proposed new mode of—broadly abductive—inference, which Poe attributes to the hybrid figure of the ‘poet-mathematician’. Without creative imagination and intuition, Science would necessarily remain incomplete, even by its own standards. This concern with imaginative (abductive) inference ties in nicely with his coherentism, which grants pride of place to the twin virtues of Simplicity and Consistency, which must constrain imagination lest it degenerate into mere fancy.
Ackroyd, P. (2008). Poe: A life cut short. London: Chatto & Windus.
Beaver, H. (1976). Commentary. In H. Beaver (Ed.), The science fiction of Edgar Allan Poe (pp. 333–426). London: Penguin Books.
Brent, J. (1998). Charles Sanders Peirce: A life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Carlson, E. W. (1973). Poe on the soul of man. Text of a lecture delivered at the fiftieth annual commemorative program of the Poe Society, October 8, 1972. Baltimore: The Edgar Allan Poe Society of Baltimore.
Chandler, R. (1944, December). The simple art of murder. The Atlantic Monthly, 57–63.
Deely, J. (2003). The word ‘semiotics’: Formation and origins. Semiotica, 146(1/4), 1–49.CrossRef
Feidelson, C. (1953). Symbolism and American literature. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Frank, L. (2003). Victorian detective fiction and the nature of evidence: The scientific investigations of Poe, Dickens and Doyle. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Gelfert, H.-D. (2008). Edgar Allan Poe: Am Rande des Malstroms. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Grimstad, P. (2005). C. Auguste Dupin and Charles S. Peirce: An abductive affinity. Edgar Allan Poe Review, 5(2), 22–30.
Harrowitz, N. (1988). The body of the detective model: Charles S. Peirce and Edgar Allan Poe. In U. Eco & T. Sebeok (Eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (pp. 179–197). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Herschel, J. F. W. (1830). Preliminary discourse on the study of natural philosophy. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green and John Taylor.
Hoagland, C. (1939). The universe of Eureka: A comparison of the theories of Eddington and Poe. Southern Literary Messenger, 1, 307–313.
Hovey, K. A. (1995). Poe’s materialist metaphysics of man. In E. W. Carlson (Ed.), A companion to Poe studies (pp. 347–366). Westport: Greenwood.
Kearns, C. (2002). Rehearsing Dupin: Poe’s duplicitous confrontation with Coleridge. Edgar Allan Poe Review, 3(1), 3–17.
Levine, S., & Levine, S. F. (2004). Introduction. In S. Levine & S. F. Levine (Eds.), Eureka (pp. i–xxvii). Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Link, F. H. (1968). Edgar Allan Poe: Ein Dichter zwischen Romantik und Moderne. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Manning, S. (1989). ‘The plots of God are perfect’: Poe’s Eureka and American creative nihilism. Journal of American Studies, 23(2), 235–251.CrossRef
Martin, T. J. (1989). Detection, imagination, and the introduction to ‘The Murders in the Rue Morgue’. Modern Language Studies, 19(4), 31–45.CrossRef
Meyers, J. (2000). Edgar Allan Poe: His life and legacy. New York: Cooper Square Press.
Nichol, J. P. (1839). Views of the architecture of the heavens (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: William Tait.
Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Abduction and geometrical analysis: Notes on Charles S. Peirce and Edgar Allan Poe. In L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 239–254). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef
Norstedt, G. (1930). Poe and Einstein. Open Court, 44, 173–180.
Paley, W. (1809). Natural theology: Or, evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity (12th ed.). London: J. Faulder.
Passage, C. E. (1954). Dostoevski the adapter. A study of Dostoevski’s use of the tales of Hoffmann. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Peeples, S. (2002). Poe’s ‘constructiveness’ and ‘The Fall of the House of Usher’. In K. J. Hayes (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Edgar Allan Poe (pp. 178–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (=CP) (Vols. 1–6, 1931–1935, Ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss); (Vols. 7–8, 1958, Ed. A. W. Burks). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Poe, E. A. (1850–1856). The works of the late Edgar Allan Poe (4 vols, Ed. by R. W. Griswold). New York: J.S. Redfield.
Poe, E. A. (1883). The works of Edgar Allan Poe. Vol. III: Poems and essays (including Eureka, Marginalia, etc.etc.). Ed. by J. H. Ingram. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.
Poe, E. A. (1966). The letters of Edgar Allan Poe. Vol. I. Ed. by J. W. Ostrom. New York: Gordian Press.
Poe, E. A. (2004). Eureka. Edited with an introduction, notes, and textual variants by S. Levine & S. F. Levine. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Reichertz, J. (1990). Folgern Sherlock Holmes oder Mr. Dupin abduktiv? Zur Fehlbestimmung der Abduktion in der semiotischen Analyse der Kriminalpoesie. Kodikas-Code/Ars Semeiotica: International Journal of Semantics, 13(3/4), 307–324.
Schlutz, A. (2008). Purloined voices: Edgar Allan Poe reading Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Studies in Romanticism, 47(2), 195–224.
Schumann, K. (1958). Die erzählende Prosa Edgar Allan Poes. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Stovall, F. (1930). Poe’s debt to Coleridge. University of Texas Studies in English, 10, 70–127.
Taylor, M. A. (2007). Edgar Allan Poe’s (meta)physics: A pre-history of the post-human. Nineteenth-Century Literature, 62(2), 193–221.CrossRef
Tresch, J. (2002). Extra! Extra! Poe invents science fiction! In K. J. Hayes (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Edgar Allan Poe (pp. 113–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
van Calmthout, M. (1995, October 7). Twee boogseconden verschil tussen Newton en Poe (Summary of an interview with René van Slooten). De Volkskrant, 1.
Wagenknecht, E. (1963). Edgar Allan Poe: The man behind the legend. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weissberg, L. (1991). Edgar Allan Poe. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.
Welsh, S. (1991). The value of analogical evidence: Poe’s Eureka in the context of a scientific debate. Modern Language Studies, 21(4), 3–15.CrossRef
Whewell, W. (1833). Astronomy and general physics considered with reference to natural theology. London: William Pickering.
- Observation, Inference, and Imagination: Elements of Edgar Allan Poe’s Philosophy of Science
Science & Education
Volume 23, Issue 3 , pp 589-607
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Axel Gelfert (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore