Abstract
Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection is central to modern biology, but is resisted by many people. This paper discusses the major psychological obstacles to accepting Darwin’s theory. Cognitive obstacles to adopting evolution by natural selection include conceptual difficulties, methodological issues, and coherence problems that derive from the intuitiveness of alternative theories. The main emotional obstacles to accepting evolution are its apparent conflict with valued beliefs about God, souls, and morality. We draw on the philosophy of science and on a psychological theory of cognitive and emotional belief revision to make suggestions about what can be done to improve acceptance of Darwinian ideas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. D. (2007). Teaching the theory of evolution in social, intellectual, and pedagogical context. Science Education 91, 664–677.
Blackwell, W. H., Powell, M. J., & Dukes, G. H. (2003). The problem of student acceptance of evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 37, 58–67.
Breakenridge, R. (2008). What is it about evolution theory that Albertans don’t get? Calgary Herald, from http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=7cfcfff3-286a-4f29-9e81-e70951b54e4c. Accessed 13 Aug 2009.
Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education 87, 181–206.
Brown, J. R. (2001). Who rules in science? An opinionated guide to the wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 161–199.
Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research in conceptual change (pp. 61–82). New York: Routledge.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420–443.
Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Penguin.
Evans, E. M. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 263–294). New York: Routledge.
Gould, S. J. (1999). Rock of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballantine.
Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hokayem, H., & BouJaoude, S. (2008). College students perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 395–419.
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17, 27–47.
Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science, 48, 507–531.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated inference. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Science communication. Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313(5788), 765–766.
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Popper, K. (1978). Natural selection and the emergence of mind. Dialectica, 32, 339–355.
Preson, J., & Epley, N. (2009). Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 238–241.
Ranney, M., & Thanukos, A. (2009). Accepting evolution or creation in people, critters, plants, and classrooms: The maelstrom of American cognition about biological change. In R. Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Evolution, epistemology, and science education. Milton Park: Routledge (forthcoming).
Richardson, R. C. (2007). Evolutionary psychology as maladapted psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schank, P., & Ranney, M. (1992). Assessing explanatory coherence: A new method for integrating verbal data with models of on-line belief revision Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive Science society (pp. 599–604). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naive and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 170–194.
Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32, 1049–1062.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 519–528.
Sober, E. (2008). Evidence and evolution: The logic behind the science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Steinhardt, P. J., & Turok, N. (2007). Endless universe: Beyond the big bang. New York: Doubleday.
Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thagard, P. (1999). How scientists explain disease. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thagard, P. (2003). Why wasn’t O. J. convicted? Emotional coherence in legal inference. Cognition and Emotion, 17(36), 1–383.
Thagard, P. (2006). Hot thought: Mechanisms and applications of emotional cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thagard, P. (2008). Conceptual change in the history of science: Life, mind, and disease. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 374–387). London: Routledge.
Thagard, P. (2009). Evolution, creation, and the philosophy of science. In R. Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Evolution, epistemology, and science education. Milton Park: Routledge (forthcoming).
Thagard, P. (2010). The brain and the meaning of life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thagard, P., & Aubie, B. (2008). Emotional consciousness: A neural model of how cognitive appraisal and somatic perception interact to produce qualitative experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 811–834.
Thagard, P., & Findlay, S. (2009). Changing minds about climate change: Belief revision, coherence, and emotion. In E. Olsson (Ed.), Science in flux: Belief revision in the context of scientific inquiry. Berlin: Springer (forthcoming).
Acknowledgments
This research has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank David Rudge, Kostas Kampourakis, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thagard, P., Findlay, S. Getting to Darwin: Obstacles to Accepting Evolution by Natural Selection. Sci & Educ 19, 625–636 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9204-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9204-8