Skip to main content
Log in

The Financial Structure of Private Held Belgian Firms

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the determinants of the debt-equity choice and the debt maturity choice for a sample of small, privately held firms in a creditor oriented environment. Our results, which are based on 4,706 firm-year observations for 1132 Belgian firms in the period 1996–2000, generally confirm the role of asymmetric information and agency costs of debt as major determinants of the financial structure of privately held firms. High growth firms and firms with less tangible assets have a lower debt ratio. We also find that more profitable firms have less debt. Firms tend to match the maturity of debt with the maturity of their assets. Growth options do not seem to influence debt maturity, which would suggest that the underinvestment problem is resolved by lowering leverage and by bank monitoring, not by reducing debt maturity. Credit risk is also an important determinant of debt maturity: firms with higher credit risk borrow more on the short term. Finally, in contrast to most studies on the financial structure of companies, we find that larger firms tend to have a higher debt ratio and a shorter debt maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baltagi, B.H. 1995, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons.

  • Barclay M. J., C. W. Smith Jr, 1995 The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt. Journal of Finance 50:609–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger A. N., G. F. Udell 1998 The Economics of Small Business Finance: The Roles of Private Equity and Debt Markets in the Financial Growth Cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance 22:613–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger A. N., Espinosa-Vega M. A., Frame W. S., N. H. Miller 2005 Debt Maturity, Risk, and Asymmetric Information. Journal of Finance 60:2895–2923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley M., Jarrell G. A., E. H. Kim 1984 On the Existence of Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Finance 39:857–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan M. J., E. S. Schwartz 1978 Corporate Income Taxes, Valuation, and the Problem of Optimal Capital Structure. Journal of Business 51:103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brick I. E., S. A. Ravid 1985 On the Relevance of Debt Maturity Structure. Journal of Finance 40:1423–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brick I. E., S. A. Ravid 1991 Interest Rate Uncertainty and the Optimal Debt Maturity Structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26:63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Cheun S., V. Goyal 1999 Bank Monitoring and the Maturity Structure of Japanese Corporate Debt Issues. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 7:229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittenden F., Hall G., P. Hutchinson 1996 Small Firm Growth, Access to Capital Markets and Financial Structure: Review of Issues and an Empirical Investigation. Small Business Economics 8:59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo H., R.W. Masulis 1980 Optimal Capital Structure under Corporate and Personal Taxation. Journal of Financial Economics 8:3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüc-Kunt A., V. Maksimovic 1999 Institutions, Financial Markets, and Debt Maturity. Journal of Financial Economics 54:295–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond D. W. 1991 Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity Risk. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106:709–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond D. W. 1993 Seniority and Maturity of Debt Contracts. Journal of Financial Economics 33:341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson G. 1961 Corporate Debt Capacity. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery M. J. 1986 Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice. Journal of Finance 41:19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham J., C. Harvey 2001 The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Financial Economics 60:187–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene W. H. 1997 Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guedes J., T. Opler 1996 The Determinants of the Maturity of Corporate Debt Issues. Journal of Finance 51:1809–1833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi T., Kashyap A., D. Scharfstein 1990 The Role of Banks in Reducing the Costs of Financial Distress in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 27:67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. C. 1986 Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review 76:323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallapur S., M. Trombley 1999 The Association Between Investment Opportunity Set Proxies and Realized Growth. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 26:505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelas N., Chittenden F., P. Poutziorous 1999 Financial Policy and Capital Structure Choice in U.K. SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Company Panel Data. Small Business Economics 12:113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F., M. H. Miller 1958 The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review 48:261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris J. R. 1976 On Corporate Debt Maturity Strategies. Journal of Finance 31(no. 1):29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers S. C. 1977 Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5:147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers S. C., N. S. Majluf 1984 Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics 13:187–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan A. 2000 An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure. European Financial Management 6(no. 2):197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ooghe H., Joos P., C. De Bourdeaudhuij 1995 Financial Distress Models in Belgium: The Results of a Decade of Empirical Research. International Journal of Accounting 30:245–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-Molina, H. and M. F. Penas, 2006, The Maturity of Loan Commitments to Small Business: An Empirical Analysis, Research Paper, Tilburg University.

  • Pettit, R. and R. Singer 1985, ‘Small Business Finance: a Research Agenda’, Financial Management, Autumn, 47–60.

  • Pindado J., L. Rodrigues, C. de la Torre 2006 How Does Financial Distress Affect Small Firms’ Financial Structure?. Small Business Economics, 26:377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C. W. Jr., 1986 Investment Banking and the Capital Acquisition Process. Journal of Financial Economics 15:3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C. W. Jr., J. B. Warner 1979 On Financial Contracting. Journal of Financial Economics 7:117–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherr F. C. and H. M. Hulburt, 2001, ‘The Debt Maturity Structure of Small Firms’, Financial Management, Spring, 8–111.

  • Stohs M. H., D. C. Mauer 1996 The Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure. Journal of Business 69:279–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wijst N., R. Thurik 1993 Determinants of Small Firm Debt Ratios: An analysis of retail panel data. Small Business Economics 5:55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dries Heyman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heyman, D., Deloof, M. & Ooghe, H. The Financial Structure of Private Held Belgian Firms. Small Bus Econ 30, 301–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9031-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9031-0

Key words

JEL classification

Navigation