Skip to main content
Log in

Young Children’s Thinking About Decomposition: Early Modeling Entrees to Complex Ideas in Science

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was part of a multi-year project on the development of elementary students’ modeling approaches to understanding the life sciences. Twenty-three first grade students conducted a series of coordinated observations and investigations on decomposition, a topic that is rarely addressed in the early grades. The instruction included in-class observations of different types of soil and soil profiling, visits to the school’s compost bin, structured observations of decaying organic matter of various kinds, study of organisms that live in the soil, and models of environmental conditions that affect rates of decomposition. Both before and after instruction, students completed a written performance assessment that asked them to reason about the process of decomposition. Additional information was gathered through one-on-one interviews with six focus students who represented variability of performance across the class. During instruction, researchers collected video of classroom activity, student science journal entries, and charts and illustrations produced by the teacher. After instruction, the first-grade students showed a more nuanced understanding of the composition and variability of soils, the role of visible organisms in decomposition, and environmental factors that influence rates of decomposition. Through a variety of representational devices, including drawings, narrative records, and physical models, students came to regard decomposition as a process, rather than simply as an end state that does not require explanation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. The University of Wisconsin Press

  • Cetin, G. (2007). English and Turkish Pupil’s understanding of decomposition. Asian-Pacific forum on Science Learning and Teaching., 8(2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, R. (2008). What’s going on in the compost pile? A book about systems. Vero Beach, FL: Rourke Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into students’ ideas. London, U.K.: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayford, C. (1986). Some aspects of the problems of teaching about energy in school biology. European Journal of Science Education, 8(4), 443–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, L. (2011). College students’ understanding of the carbon cycle: Contrasting Principle-based and informal reasoning. Bioscience., 61(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellden, G. (1992). Pupils’ understanding of ecological process (The LISMA group learning in science and mathematics Report No.2). Kristianstad University College, Sweden.

  • Holmes, K. J. (1998). Earthworms. Mankato, MN: Capstone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J. (1996). Children’s ideas about ecology 2: Ideas found in children aged 5–16 about the cycling of matter. International Journal of Science Education., 18(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., Carpenter, S., Schauble, L., & Putz, A. (2000). Designing classrooms that support inquiry. In R. Minstrell & E. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 80–99). Reston, VA: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education., 96(4), 701–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira, M., & Freitas, M. (1986). Death and decomposition of living organisms; children’s alternative frameworks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Teacher Education in Europe. France: Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1986). Alternative student conceptions of matter cycling in ecosystems. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Francisco: California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education., 92(5), 941–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0628253. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isi Ero-Tolliver.

Appendix: Classroom Pre- and Post-written Assessment

Appendix: Classroom Pre- and Post-written Assessment

Every year, in the autumn, all the leaves fall off of the trees to the ground below. You may have enjoyed raking the leaves into huge piles and jumping in them. Although you have only been around for 6 or 7 years, the leaves have been falling each of those years and many more. That’s a lot of leaves!! Why aren’t there mountains of leaves covering everything after all this time? In the space below, carefully explain what you think is happening so that a student in Mrs. Smith’s class would understand. Draw and label a picture to help you explain what is happening to the leaves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ero-Tolliver, I., Lucas, D. & Schauble, L. Young Children’s Thinking About Decomposition: Early Modeling Entrees to Complex Ideas in Science. Res Sci Educ 43, 2137–2152 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9348-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9348-4

Keywords

Navigation