Applebaum, S., Barker, B., & Pinzino, D. (2006, April). Socioscientific issues as context for conceptual understanding of content. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and knowing. Educational Psychologist
Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D. T., & Zuiker, S. (in press). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: A framework for socio-scientific inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Barab, S. A., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development
Berkowitz, M. W., & Simmons, P. (2003). Integrating science education and character education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 117–138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Bingle, W. H., & Gaskell, P. J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decisionmaking and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education
Boone, W. J., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). The role of Rasch analysis when conducting science education research utilising multiple-choice tests. Science Education
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy.
Cajas, F. (1999). Public understanding of science: Using technology to enhance school science in everyday life. International Journal of Science Education
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research
Clarkburn, H. (2002). A test of ethical sensitivity in science. Journal of Moral Education
Davies, I. (2004). Science and citizenship education. International Journal of Science Education
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education
Fowler, S., & Tabone, C. (2006, April). Socioscientific issues and moral sensitivity of high school science students. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.
Gallagher, R., & Appenzeller, T. (1999). Beyond reductionism. Science
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education
Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups’ ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (Eds.) (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.
Kolstø, S. D. (2001a). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education
Kolstø, S. D. (2001b). ‘To trust or not to trust,...’ – pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education
Kortland, K. (1996). An STS case study about students’ decision making on the waste issue. Science Education
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Sadler, T. D. (2006, April). Nature of science in the context of socioscientific issues. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy.
Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach. School Science and Mathematics
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., & Chambers, F. W. (2004). Student conceptualisations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education
Walker, K. A. (2003). Students’ understanding of the nature of science and their reasoning on socioscientific issues: A web-based learning inquiry. Unpublished dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Yang, F.-Y., & Anderson, O. R. (2003). Senior high school students’ preference and reasoning modes about nuclear energy use. International Journal of Science Education
Zeidler, D. L. (1997). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Education
Zeidler, D. L., Callahan, B., Cone, N., & Burek, K. (2006, April). The effects of learning socioscientific issues on reflective judgment in high school science students. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching