Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: producing more and getting less than their U.S.-born peers?

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Chronicle of Higher Education recently reported that the number of doctoral degrees awarded in the U.S. rose 3.4 percent in 2004, largely because of an increase in foreign students [Smallwood (2005). Doctoral degrees rose 3.4% in 2004, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 9, 2005]. Currently, 20.9 percent [National Science Board (2003). The science and engineering workforce realizing America’s potential. NSB, vol. 3, National Science Foundation] of all science and engineering faculty positions at U.S. universities are held by foreign-born scientists (with even larger percentages in computer science and engineering)—and we can expect higher numbers of foreign-born faculty at U.S. universities in the future. In this paper, we use 2001 Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR) data from the National Science Foundation to compare productivity levels, work satisfaction levels and career trajectories of foreign-born scientists and U.S.-born scientists. The results indicate that foreign-born academic scientists and engineers are more productive than their U.S.-born peers in all areas. Yet, average salaries and work satisfaction levels for foreign-born scientists are lower than for U.S.-born scientists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews F. M. (1964). Scientific performance as related to time spent on technical work, teaching, or administration. Administrative Science Quarterly 9:182–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antony J. S., Valadez J. R. (2002). Exploring the satisfaction of part-time college faculty in the United States. Review of Higher Education 26(1):41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin H. S., Antonio A. L., Cress C. M., Astin A. W. (1997). Race and ethnicity in the American professoriate, 1995–1996. University of California, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin H. S., Davis D. E. (1985). Research productivity across the life and career cycles: facilitators and barriers for women. In: Fox M. (Ed) Scholarly writing and publishing: Issues, problems, and solutions. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • August L., Waltman. J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education 45(2):177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbezat D. A. (2002). History of pay equity studies. New Directions for Institutional Research 115:9–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellas M. (1993). Faculty salaries: Still a cost of being female? Social Science Quarterly 74:62–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellas M. L., Toutkoushian R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education 22:367–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, K. A., and Heywood. J. S. (2004). Job Satisfaction of the highly educated: The role of gender, academic tenure, and comparison income. In: Science and Engineering Workforce Project. National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Bentley J. T., Adamson. R. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas G. J. (1994). The economics of immigration. Journal of Economic Literature 32:1667–1717

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr P. L., Ash A. S., Friedman R. H., Scaramucci A., Barnett R. C., Szalacha L., Palepu A., Moskowitz M. A. (1998). Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Annals of Internal Medicine 129:532–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark S. M., Corcoran M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: A case of accumulative advantage. Journal of Higher Education 57:20–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark S. M., Lewis D. R. (1985). Faculty vitality and institutional productivity: Critical perspectives for higher education. Teachers College Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole J. R., Singer B. (1991). A theory of limited differences: Explaining the productivity puzzle in science. In: Zuckerman H., Cole J. R., Bruer J. T. (eds.) The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, Norton and Company, New York, NY, pp. 277–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole J. R., Zuckerman H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication among men and women scientists. In: Steinkamp M. W., Maehr, M. L., Kleiber, D. A., Nicholls J. G. (eds.) Advances in motivation and achievement, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole J. R., Zuckerman H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Scientific American 25:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole J. R., Zuckerman. H. (1991). Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science. In: Zuckerman H., Cole J. R., Bruer J. T. (eds.) The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, Norton and Company, New York, NY, pp. 157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley E. A. (2005). How do career strategies, gender, and work environment affect faculty productivity levels in university-based science centers? Review of Policy Research 22:637–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond A. M. (1986). The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. Journal of Gerontology 41:520–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder B. (2005). The H-1B visa: Is this the answer to staffing problems? Technical Support 13:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade T. J., Usdansky M. L., Chung C. Y. (2001). Employment and earnings of foreign-born scientists and engineers. Population Research and Policy Review 20:81–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber M. A., Green C. A. (1982). Traditional or reverse sex discrimination? A case study of a large public university. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 35:550–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education 65:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gappa J. M. (2000). The new faculty majority: Somewhat satisfied but not eligible for tenure. New Directions for Institutional Research 105:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginther D. K. (2004). Why women earn less: Economic explanations for gender salary gap in science. AWIS Magazine 33:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginther D. K., Hayes K. J. (1999). Gender differences in salary and promotion in the Humanities. The American Economic Review 89:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn L. S. (1996). Wage equity and female faculty job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction causal model. Research in Higher Education 37:569–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn L. S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research 105:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handel M. J. (2005). Trends in perceived job quality, 1989 to 1998. Work and Occupations 32:66–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie J., Marsh H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 66:507–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E. P. (1976). Faculty salaries: Is there discrimination by sex, race, and discipline? Additional evidence. The American Economic Review 66:196–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud L. K., Heck R. H. (1994). A university’s faculty: Predicting those who will stay and those who leave. Journal for Higher Education Management 10:71–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg A. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review 42:124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz D. A. (1973). Faculty salaries, promotions, and productivity at a large university. The American Economic Review 63:469–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith B., Layne J. S., Babchuk N., Johnson K. (2002). The context of scientific acheivement: Sex status, organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship outcomes. Social Forces 80:1253–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laden B.V., Hagedorn. L. S. (2000). Job satisfaction among faculty of color in academe: Individual survivors or institutional transformers? New Directions for Institutional Research 105:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D. M. S. (1992). Job challenge, work effort, and job performance of young engineers: A causal analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 39:214–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2004). Foreign-born scientists in the United States – Do they perform differently than Native-born scientists? (Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology). Dissertation and Theses: A&I AAT 3155279

  • Levin S. G., Stephan P. E. (1989). Age and research productivity of academic scientists. Research in Higher Education 30:531–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S. G., Stephan P. E. (1999). Are the Foreign-born a source of strength for U.S. Science? Science 285:1213–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitan A. S., Russ R. (1992). Personal and institutional characteristics affecting research productivity of academic accountants. Journal of Education and Business 67:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebert R. J. (1977). Research-Grant getting and productivity among scholars: Recent national patterns of competition and favor. Journal of Higher Education 48:164–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C. A. (2004). Are foreign scientists good for the U.S. scientific force? Bioscience 54:892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke E. A., Fitzpatrick W., White F. M. (1983). Job satisfaction and role clarity among university and college faculty. Review of Higher Education 6:343–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb J. W., Ferber M. A., Lowry H. M. (1978). The effectiveness of affirmative action for women. Journal of Higher Education 49:218–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review 43:889–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long J. S., Allison P. D., McGinnis R. (1979). Entrance into the academic career. American Sociological Review 44:816–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long J. S., Fox M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21:45–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh H. W., Hattie J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education 73:603–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason M. A., Goulden M. (2004). Marriage and baby blues: Redefining gender equity in the academy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 596:86–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiksins P. F., Watson J. M. (1989). Professional autonomy and organizational constraint. The Sociological Quarterly 30:561–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer B. N. (1949). The productivity of Social Scientists. The American Journal of Sociology 55:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Loessi K., Henderson D. (1997). Changes in American society: The context for academic couples. In: Ferber M. A., Loeb J. W. (Eds) Academic couples, University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL, pp. 25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (2003). The science and engineering workforce realizing America’s potential. NSB, vol. 3: National Science Foundation

  • Norris, J. T. (2004). Restrictions on research awards: Troublesome clauses. A report to the AAU/COGR Task Force. Association of American Universities, August, 2004

  • North D. S. (1995). Soothing the establishment the impact of foreign-born scientists and engineers on America, University Press of America, Inc., Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist J. G., Hitchcock M. A., Teherani A. (2000). Faculty Satisfaction in Academic Medicine. New Directions for Institutional Research 105:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen D., Maple S. A., Stage F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. Journal of Higher Education 66:267–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palepu A., Carr P. L., Friedman R. H., Ash A. S., Moskowitz M. A. (2000). Specialty choices, compensation, and career satisfaction of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine. Academic Medicine 75:157–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna L. W. (2001). Sex and race differences in faculty tenure and promotion. Research in Higher Education 42:541–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausch D. K., Ortiz B. P., Douthitt R. A., Reed. L. L. (1989). The academic revolving door: Why do women get caught? CUPA Journal 40:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropers-Huilman B. (2000). Aren’t you satisfied yet? Women faculty members’ interpretations of their academic work. New Directions for Institutional Research 105:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, S. (2005). Doctoral degrees rose 3.4% in 2004, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 9, 2005

  • Sonnert, G. with the assistance of Holton, G. (1995). Gender differences in science careers: The Project Access study, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ

  • Stack S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education 45:891–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan P. E., Levin S. G. (2001). Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated. Population Research and Policy Review 20:59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. E., Sumell, A. J., Black, G. C., and Adams, J. D. (2004). Doctoral education and economic development: The flow of new Ph.D.s to industry. Economic Development Quarterly 18:151–167

  • Strathman J. G. (2000). Consistent estimation of faculty rank effects in academic salary models. Research in Higher Education 41:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian R. K. (1998). Racial and marital status differences in faculty pay. Journal of Higher Education 69:513–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian R. K., Bellas M. L. (2003). The effects of part-time employment and gender on faculty earnings and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education 74:172–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian R. K., Conley V. M. (2005). Progress for women in academe, yet inequities persist: Evidence from NSOPF: 99. Research in Higher Education 46:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman B. H., Tuckman H. P. (1976). The structure of salaries at American universities. Journal of Higher Education 47:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner C. S. V. (2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. Journal of Higher Education 73:74–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanner R. A., Lewis L. S., Gregorio D. I. (1981). Research productivity in academia: A comparative study of the sciences, social sciences and humanities. Sociology of Education 54:238–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward M. E., Sloane P. J. (2000). Non-pecuniary advantages versus pecuniary disadvantages: Job satisfaction among male and female in Scottish universities. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 47:273–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson J. M., Meiksins P. F. (1991). What do engineers want? Work values, job rewards, and job satisfaction. Science, Technology, & Human Values 16:140–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y., Shauman K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity:New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review 63:847–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman H. (1991). The careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. In: Zuckerman H., Cole J. R., Bruer J. T. (Eds) The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, Norton and Company, New York, NY, pp. 27–56

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Lindsey Gorzalski and Sarah Snyder for their research assistance. The use of National Science Foundation (NSF) data does not imply NSF endorsement of the research methods or conclusions contained in this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, 411 N. Central Avenue, Suite 450, Mail Code 3720, Phoenix, AZ, 85004-0687, USA

    Elizabeth A. Corley & Meghna Sabharwal

Authors
  1. Elizabeth A. Corley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meghna Sabharwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Corley.

Additional information

The use of NSF data does not imply NSF endorsement of the research methods or conclusions contained in this report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corley, E.A., Sabharwal, M. Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: producing more and getting less than their U.S.-born peers?. Res High Educ 48, 909–940 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9055-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9055-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation