Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 69–95

Connectivity, sustainability, and yield: bridging the gap between conventional fisheries management and marine protected areas

Authors

    • Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation BiologyUniversity of California
  • Daniel R. Brumbaugh
    • Center for Biodiversity and ConservationAmerican Museum of Natural History
  • Churchill Grimes
    • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Fisheries Ecology DivisionSouthwest Fisheries Science Center
  • Julie B. Kellner
    • Department of Environmental Science and PolicyUniversity of California
  • John Largier
    • Bodega Marine LaboratoryUniversity of California, Davis
  • Michael R. O’Farrell
    • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Fisheries Ecology DivisionSouthwest Fisheries Science Center
  • Stephen Ralston
    • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Fisheries Ecology DivisionSouthwest Fisheries Science Center
  • Elaine Soulanille
    • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Fisheries Ecology DivisionSouthwest Fisheries Science Center
  • Vidar Wespestad
    • Resource Analysts International
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11160-008-9092-z

Cite this article as:
Botsford, L.W., Brumbaugh, D.R., Grimes, C. et al. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2009) 19: 69. doi:10.1007/s11160-008-9092-z

Abstract

A substantial shift toward use of marine protected areas (MPAs) for conservation and fisheries management is currently underway. This shift to explicit spatial management presents new challenges and uncertainties for ecologists and resource managers. In particular, the potential for MPAs to change population sustainability, fishery yield, and ecosystem properties depends on the poorly understood consequences of three critical forms of connectivity over space: larval dispersal, juvenile and adult swimming, and movement of fishermen. Conventional fishery management describes the dynamics and current status of fish populations, with increasing recent emphasis on sustainability, often through reference points that reflect individual replacement. These compare lifetime egg production (LEP) to a critical replacement threshold (CRT) whose value is uncertain. Sustainability of spatially distributed populations also depends on individual replacement, but through all possible paths created by larval dispersal and LEP at each location. Model calculations of spatial replacement considering larval connectivity alone indicate sustainability and yield depend on species dispersal distance and the distribution of LEP created by species habitat distribution and fishing mortality. Adding MPAs creates areas with high LEP, increasing sustainability, but not necessarily yield. Generally, short distance dispersers will persist in almost all MPAs, while sustainability of long distance dispersers requires a specific density of MPAs along the coast. The value of that density also depends on the uncertain CRT, as well as fishing rate. MPAs can increase yield in areas with previously low LEP but for short distance dispersers, high yields will require many small MPAs. The paucity of information on larval dispersal distances, especially in cases with strong advection, renders these projections uncertain. Adding juvenile and adult movement to these calculations reduces LEP near the edges in MPAs, if movement is within a home-range, but more broadly over space if movement is diffusive. Adding movement of fishermen shifts effort on the basis of anticipated revenues and fishing costs, leading to lower LEP near ports, for example. Our evolving understanding of connectivity in spatial management could form the basis for a new, spatially oriented replacement reference point for sustainability, with associated new uncertainties.

Keywords

Connectivity Marine reserve Metapopulation Fisheries management Dispersal Home range

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008