Fishing Rights or Fishing Wrongs? Special Segment: Rights Based Fisheries First Online: 24 April 2006 Accepted: 07 November 2005 DOI:
10.1007/s11160-005-5138-7 Cite this article as: Hilborn, R., Parrish, J.K. & Litle, K. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2005) 15: 191. doi:10.1007/s11160-005-5138-7 Abstract
Increasing attention is being paid to overfishing and the biological, economic, and social implications of persistent mismanagement of aquatic natural resources. In this chorus of concern, little attention is focused on sustainable fisheries, and the lessons to be learned from management systems that produce these successes. Although there is no one prescription for sustainability, a range of quota-based management tools have been used to eliminate the race for fish, increasing the incentives for long-term investment and efficiency. Variously referred to as fishing rights, tenure rights, or dedicated access privileges, quota-based fisheries confer a percentage (or quota) of the total allowable catch to named entities over some predetermined period, from short-term auction systems to intergenerational customary sea tenure. Whether a rights-based system stems from a traditional fishing rights system or has been recently introduced into modern commercial fisheries, achieving sustainability in the fishery is dependent on incentivizing the collective – from local communities to national fleets – to actively participate in self-regulation of the resource. Thus criticism of the approach often stems from the observation of the potential for cheating at the individual level (e.g., high grading, excessive discards), and the necessary exclusivity that accompanies any transition in management from open access to club membership. It is also worth noting that the resource in question – the fish – remain a public good, and as such, the public should be compensated – or at least not taxed – for their use. Thus the cost of fishery management, and the windfall profits of fishery conversion, should be shared. Rights-based management is not a silver bullet, and is probably not appropriate for all fisheries; however, the successes of the longline fisheries for Pacific halibut and sablefish in Alaska, the artisanal fisheries for loco in Chile and for spiny lobster in Mexico, and the Australian fisheries for Northern prawns and rock lobster, all clearly indicate that fishing rights should have a central place in the fisheries management toolbox.
Keywords auctions co-ops dedicated access privileges ITQ sea tenure sustainable fisheries Quotas References Acheson, J.M. 1988Lobster Gangs of Maine University Press of New England Hanover, NH 181 Google Scholar Acheson, J.M., Taylor, L. 2001 The anatomy of the Maine lobster comanagement law Soc. Nat. Resour. 14 425 441 Google Scholar Adams, T.J. 1998 The interface between traditional and modern methods of fishery management in the Pacific Islands Ocean Coastal Manage. 40 127 142 Google Scholar Anderson, L.G. 1995 A commentary on the views of environmental groups on access control in fisheries Ocean Coastal Manage. 28 165 188 Google Scholar Annala, J.H. 1996 New Zealand’s ITQ system: Have the first eight years been a success or a failure Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 6 43 62 CrossRef Google Scholar Arnason, R. 1995The Icelandic Fisheries Fishing News Books Oxford 177 Google Scholar Arnason, R. 2005 Property rights in fisheries: Iceland’s experience with ITQs Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 221 241 Google Scholar Aswani, S. 2005 Customary sea tenure in Oceania as a case of rights-based fishery management: Does it work? Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 263 285 Google Scholar Barton, J. 2002 Fisheries and fisheries management in Falkland Islands conservation zones Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 12 127 135 Google Scholar
Beakstead, D. and Brown, W.M. (2005) Provincial income disparities through an urban-rural lens: Evidence from the 2001 census. Analytical Paper. Statistics Canada. 11-624-MIE no. 012.
Bromley, D.W. 2005 Purging the frontier from our mind: Crafting a new fisheries policy Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 193 207 Google Scholar
Castilla, J.C., Manríquez, P., Alvarado, J., Rosson, A., Pino, C., Espoz, C., Soto, R., Oliva, D. and Defeo, O. (1998) Artisanal “Caletas” as units of production and co-managers of benthic invertebrates in Chile.
In: Jamieson, G.S. and Campell, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the North Pacific Symposium on Invertebrate Stock Assessment and Management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Vol. 125, pp. 407–413. Castilla, J.C., Fernandez, M. 1998 Small-scale benthic fisheries in Chile: On co-management and sustainable use of benthic invertebrates Ecol. Appl. 8 S124 S132 Google Scholar Christy, F.T. 1997 Economic waste in fisheries: Impediments to change and conditions for improvement Pikitch, E.K. Huppert, D.D. Sissenwine, M.P. eds. Global Trends: Fisheries Management American Fisheries Society Symposium 20 Bethesda 28 39 Google Scholar Copes, P. 1986 A critical review of the individual quota as a device in fisheries management Land Econ. 62 278 291 Google Scholar Defeo, O., Castilla, J.C. 2005 More than one bag for the world fishery crisis and keys for co-management successes in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheries Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 243 261 Google Scholar Fujita, R., Bonzon, K. 2005 Rights-based fisheries management: An environmentalist’s perspective Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 287 289 Google Scholar Fujita, R., Bonzon, K., Wilen, J., Solow, A., Arnason, R., Cannon, J., Polasky, S. 2004 Rationality of chaos? Global fisheries at a crossroads Glover, L.K. Earle, S.A. eds. Defying Ocean’s End: An Agenda for Action Island Press Washington 139 149 Google Scholar Gauvin, J.R., Ward, J.M., Burgess, E.E. 1994 Description and evaluation of the wreckfish fishery under individual transferable quotas Mar. Resour. Econ. 9 99 118 Google Scholar Gelcich, S., Edwards-Jones, G., Kaiser, M.J., Watson, E. 2005 Using discourses for policy evaluation: The case of marine common property rights in Chile Soc. Nat. Resour. 18 377 391 Google Scholar Gonzalez, E., Norambuena, R., Garcia, M. 2001 Initial allocation of harvesting rights in the Chilean fishery for Patagonian toothfish Shotton, R. eds. Case Studies on the Allocation of Transferable Quota Rights in Fisheries UN FAO Rome 305 321 Google Scholar Gordon, H.S. 1954 The Economic Theory of a common property resource: The fishery J. Political Econ. 62 124 142 CrossRef Google Scholar Hannesson, R. 2005 Rights based fishing: Use rights versus property rights to fish Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 209 219 Google Scholar Hardin, G. 1968 Tragedy of the commons Science 162 1243 1248 Google Scholar Hilborn, R., Branch, T.A., Ernst, B., Magnusson, A., Minte-Vera, C.V., Scheuerell, M.D., Valero, J.L. 2003 State of the world’s fisheries Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28 359 399 Google Scholar Holland, D.S., Ginter, J.J.C. 2001 Common property institutions in the Alaskan groundfish fisheries Mar. Policy 25 33 42 Google Scholar Huppert, D.D. 2005 An overview of fishing rights Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 15 175 191 Google Scholar Ianelli, J. 2005 Assessment and fisheries management of eastern Bering Sea walleye pollock: Is sustainability luck? Bull. Mar. Sci. 76 321 335 Google Scholar Jackson, J.B.C., Kirby, M.X., Berger, W.H., Bjorndal, K.A., Botsford, L.W., Bourque, B.J., Bradbury, R.H., Cooke, R., Erlandson, J., Estes, J.A., Hughes, T.P., Kidwell, S., Lange, C.B., Lenihan, H.S., Pandolfi, J.M., Peterson, C.H., Steneck, R.S., Tegner, M.J., Warner, R.R. 2001 Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems Science 293 629 638 PubMed Google Scholar
Jennings, F.B. Jr. (1999) Scaring the fish: A critique of the NRC’s justification for individual transferable quotas (ITQs) and a ‘systems analysis’ of their likely effects. A report submitted to Greenpeace. Center for Ecological Economic and Ethical Education.
Johannes, R.E. 1981Words of the Lagoon: Fishing and Marine Lore in the Palau District of Micronesia University of California Press Berkley, CA Google Scholar Johannes, R.E. 2002 The renaissance of community-based marine resource management in Oceania Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33 317 340 CrossRef Google Scholar
Lack, M., Short, K. and Willock, A. (2003) Managing risk and uncertainty in deep-sea fisheries: Lessons from Orange Roughy. TRAFFIC Oceania and WWF Australia.
Macinko, S., Bromley, D.W. 2002Who Owns America’s Fisheries Island Press Washington, DC 41 Google Scholar Matulich, S.C., Mittelhammer, R.C., Reberte, C. 1996 Towards a more complete model of individual transferable fishing quotas: Implications of incorporating the processing sector J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 31 112 128 CrossRef Google Scholar McCay, B.J. 1995 Social and ecological implications of ITQs: An overview Ocean Coastal Manage. 28 3 22 Google Scholar Milazzo, M. 1998Subsidies in World Fisheries – A Re-examination The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank Washington, DC 86 Google Scholar National Research Council 1999aSharing the Fish: Toward a National Policy on Individual Fishing Quotas National Academy Press Washington, DC Google Scholar National Research Council 1999bThe Community Development Quota Program in Alaska National Academy Press Washington, DC Google Scholar National Research Council 2003Cooperative Research in the National Marine Fisheries Service National Academy Press Washington, DC Google Scholar
Orensanz, J.M., Hilborn, R. and Parma, A.M. (2000) Harvesting Methuselah’s clams: Is the geoduck fishery sustainable, or just apparently so? Can. Stock Assess. Secr., Res. Doc. 2000/175. 68 pp.
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guenette, S., Pitcher, T., Sumaila, U.R, Walters, C.J, Watson, R., Zeller, D. 2002 Towards sustainability in world fisheries Nature 418 689 695 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Peña-Torries, J. 1997 The political economy of fishing regulations: The case of Chile Mar. Resour. Econ. 12 253 280 Google Scholar Pikitch, E.K., Santora, C., Babcock, E.A., Bakun, A., Bonfil, R., Conover, D.O., Dayton, P., Doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Henneman, B., Houde, E.D., Link, J., Livingston, P.A., Mangel, M., McAllister, M.K., Pope, J., Sainsbury, K.J. 2004 Ecosystem-based fishery management Science 305 346 347 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Ruddle, K. 1989 The organization of traditional inshore fishery management systems in the Pacific Neher, P.A. Arnason, R. Mollett, N. eds. Rights Based Fishing Kluwer Academic Publishing Dordrecht, Netherlands 73 85 Google Scholar Ruddle, K. 1998 The context of policy design for existing community-based fisheries management systems in the Pacific Islands Ocean Coastal Manage. 40 105 126 Google Scholar Schreiber, D.K. 2001 Co-management without involvement: The plight of fishing communities Fish Fisheries 2 376 384 CrossRef Google Scholar Sissenwine, M.P., Rosenberg, A.A. 1993 US fisheries: Status, long-term potential yields, and stock management ideas Oceanus 36 48 54 Google Scholar Smith, A.D.M., Sainsbury, K.J., Stevens, R.A. 1999 Implementing effective fisheries-management systems – management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56 967 979 CrossRef Google Scholar
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO). (2002)
Yearbook of Fishery Statistics. Vol. 91. Rome, 20 pp.
US Commission on Ocean Policy (USCOP). (2004)
An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. Final Report. Washington, DC.
Virdin, J. and Schorr, D. (2001) Hard facts, hidden problems: A review of current data on fishing subsidies. World Wildlife Fund Technical Paper.
Warren, B., Drouin, M. 2000 Tribal fishing rights Pacific Fish. 21 26 31 Google Scholar Wilen, J.E. 2005 Property rights and the texture of rents in fisheries Leal, D.R. eds. Evolving Property Rights in Marine Fisheries Rowan and Littlefield Publishers Inc. Lanham, MD 49 67 Google Scholar Wilen, J.E., Homans, F.R. 1997 Unraveling rent losses in modern fisheries: Production, market, or regulatory inefficiencies? Pikitch, E.K. Huppert, D.D. Sissenwine, M.P. eds. Global Trends: Fisheries Management American Fisheries Society Symposium 20 Bethesda, MD 256 263 Google Scholar