Understanding Criminal Law through the Lens of Reason
- François Tanguay-Renaud
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In 1968, H.L.A. Hart, who was then in his last year as Professor of Jurisprudence at the University of Oxford, published a collection of his past essays on criminal law theory which he complemented with a postscript (Hart 1968). Four decades later, his most recent successor in title, John Gardner, offers us a similarly organised compilation—Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law—in which a Reply to Critics is substituted for the postscript. Hart’s collection is widely acknowledged as one of his foremost contributions to the philosophy of law and, to this day, remains one of the foundational texts in criminal law theory. In Offences and Defences, John Gardner carries the Oxonian torch admirably in terms of both depth and innovation. He provides us with a remarkably rich, coherent, and thought-provoking set of arguments that will no doubt join Hart’s among the classic starting-points for philosophical inquiry about the criminal law.
I say that Gardner’s c
- Brownlee, Kimberley. 2009. Book review on John Gardner, offences and defences. Ethics 119(3): 561–566. CrossRef
- French, Peter. 1984. Collective and corporate responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Gardner, John. 1998. On the general part of the criminal law. In Philosophy and the criminal law: Principle and critique, ed. R.A. Duff, 205–256. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Gardner, John. 2005. Wrongs and faults. Review of Metaphysics 59(1): 95–132.
- Gardner, John. 2007a. Prohibiting immoralities. Cardozo Law Review 28(6): 2613–2628.
- Gardner, John. 2007b. Some types of law. In Common law theory, ed. Douglas E. Edlin, 51–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Gardner, John. 2008. Hart and Feinberg on responsibility. In The legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, political, and moral philosophy, ed. Matthew H. Kramer, Claire Grant, Ben Colburn, and Antony Hatzistavrou, 121–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gardner, John. forthcoming a. Justification under authority. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. Available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1345763.
- Gardner, John. forthcoming b. The logic of excuses and the rationality of emotions. Journal of Value Inquiry. doi:10.1007/s10790-009-9181-9. Available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1261764.
- Gardner, John, and Timothy Macklem. 2002. Reasons. In The Oxford handbook of jurisprudence and philosophy of law, ed. John Coleman, and Scott Shapiro, 440–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hart, H.L.A. 1968. Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Husak, Douglas. 2009. Gardner on the philosophy of criminal law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29(1): 169–187. CrossRef
- Kamm, Frances. 1986. Morality, mortality: Volume II: Rights, duties, and status. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Nathanson, Stephen. 1985. Does it matter if the death penalty is arbitrarily administered? Philosophy and Public Affairs 14: 149–164.
- Pettit, Philip. 2007. Responsibility incorporated. Ethics 117(1): 171–201. CrossRef
- Simester, A.P. 2009. Wrongs and reasons. Modern Law Review 72(4): 648–668. CrossRef
- Thorburn, Malcolm. 2008. Justifications, powers, and authority. Yale Law Journal 117(6): 1070–1130. CrossRef
- Understanding Criminal Law through the Lens of Reason
Volume 16, Issue 1 , pp 89-98
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada