Skip to main content
Log in

With or without you: market quality of floor trading when screen trading closes early

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most stock markets are characterized by a number of parallel operating trading systems which interact intensively with each other. Usually, smaller trading platforms take the leading domestic main market as a benchmark in the price discovery process and for closing open trading positions. But what happens if the smaller trading systems suddenly have to act without this benchmark platform? We examine the effects of the reduction of the daily business hours of a screen based main trading system while a parallel floor based trading system keeps on operating. We provide evidence that liquidity improves while informed trading and informational efficiency of prices decrease at the floor based trading system as a result of the no longer operating main market. While prior research on parallel trading focuses on changes due to a growing number of trading venues, we present the first evidence on market effects when the main trading platform reduces trading hours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Boehmer and Boehmer (2003), Battalio (1997), Wahal (1997), Mayhew (2002), Fong et al. (2001), DeFontnouvelle et al. (2000), Conrad et al. (2003), Biais (1993) or Chowdhry and Nanda (1991).

  2. See Bernhardt and Hughson (1997), Amihud et al. (2003), Arnold et al. (1999), Madhavan (1995), Jain (2002), Pagano (1989a, b).

  3. See Barclay and Hendershott (2003, 2004) and McInish et al. (2002).

  4. Numerous studies provide evidence that trading activities display intraday pattern, such as: Wood et al. (1985), Jain and Joh (1988), McInish and Wood (1992), Abhyankar et al. (1997) and Chan et al. (1995).

  5. The trading system Xetra of Deutsche Börse AG opened every business day from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the past. Since Nov. 3, 2003 Xetra operates every business day only until 5:30 p.m. For further details see Sects. 2 and 3.

  6. Goodfellow and Bohl (2006) and Goodfellow et al. (2008) analyze the same event as we do. In contrast to this study, they focus on the implications for institutional and retail investors. They reason, that due to the event after hour trading has become more attractive for retail investors. However, their main findings are in line with observations made in this study.

  7. For further information on the microstructure of German equity markets see Demarchi and Foucault (2000) and Commerton-Forde and Rydge (2004).

  8. The membership of the security in the CDAX does not qualify for “Prime Standard”, given that this index includes all listed companies.

  9. See Reck (2001) and Theissen (2003a) for a description of the trading system Xetra.

  10. The first day with the new Xetra operating hours was Monday Nov. 3, 2003. The last day of trading with the old operating hours was Friday Oct. 31, 2003.

  11. See Theissen (2003a, b) for an overview on the trading system of the floor of the FSE.

  12. A larger number of securities (none included in the sample) is too illiquid for continues trading. Thus, only daily call auctions are conducted. The same applies for Xetra.

  13. See Easley et al. (1996, 1997a, b, and 2002).

References

  • Abhyankar A, Ghosh D, Levin E, Limmack RJ (1997) Bid-ask spreads, trading volume and volatility: intra-day evidence from the London stock exchange. J Bus Finance Account 24(3/4):343–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amihud Y, Lauterbach B, Mendelson H (2003) The value of trading consolidation: evidence from the exercise of warrants. J Financ Quant Anal 38(4):829–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand A, Martell T (2001) “Informed” limit order trading. Presented at 2002 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio

  • Arnold T, Hersch P, Mulherin JH, Netter J (1999) Merging markets. J Finance 54(3):1083–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay MJ, Hendershott T (2003) Price discovery and trading after hours. Rev Financ Stud 16(4):1041–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay MJ, Hendershott T (2004) Liquidity externalities and adverse selection: evidence from trading after hours. J Finance 59(2):681–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay MJ, Hendershott T, McCormick DT (2003) Competition among trading venues: information and trading on electronic communications networks. J Finance 58(6):2637–2666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnea A (1974) Performance evaluation of New York stock exchange specialists. Q J Econ 107:797–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch S (2005) Who benefits from an open limit-order book? J Bus 78(4):1267–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battalio RH (1997) Third market broker-dealers: cost competitors or cream skimmers? J Finance 52(1):341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt D, Hughson E (1997) Splitting orders. Rev Financ Econ 10(1):69–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge S, Nelson C (1981) A new approach to the decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to the measurement of the ‘Business Cycle’. J Monet Econ 7:151–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biais B (1993) Price formation and equilibrium liquidity in fragmented and centralized markets. J Finance 48(1):157–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield R, O’Hara M, Saar G (2005) The “Make” or “Take” decision in an electronic market: evidence on the evolution of liquidity. J Financ Econ 75(1):165–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer B, Boehmer E (2003) Trading your neighbor’s ETFs: competition or fragmentation. J Bank Finance 27(9):1667–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer E, Kelley E, Pirinsky C (2009) Institutional investors and the informational efficiency of prices. Rev Financ Stud 22(9):3563–3594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer E, Saar G, Yu L (2005) Lifting the veil: an analysis of pre-trade transparency at the NYSE. J Finance 60(2):783–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K, Chung YP, Johnson H (1995) The intraday behavior of bid-ask spreads for NYSE stocks and CBOE options. J Financ Quant Anal 30:329–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K, Chung YP, Fong W-M (2002) The informational role of stock and option volume. Rev Financ Stud 15(4):1049–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chordia T, Roll R, Subrahmanyam A (2005) Liquidity and market efficiency. Working Paper, UCLA Anderson School of Management

  • Chowdhry B, Nanda V (1991) Multimarket trading and market liquidity. Rev Financ Stud 4(3):483–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commerton-Forde C, Rydge J (2004) A review of stock market microstructure. Working Paper, SIRCA

  • Conrad J, Johnson KM, Wahal S (2003) Institutional trading and alternative trading systems. J Financ Econ 70(1):99–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFontnouvelle P, Fishe RPH, Harris JH (2000) The behavior of bid-ask spreads and volume in options markets during the competition for listings in 1999. Working Paper, University of Miami

  • Demarchi M, Foucault T (2000) Equity trading systems in Europe: a survey of recent changes. Annales D’Économie et de Statistique 60:73–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Börse (2003) Factbook 2003, http://www.deutsche-boerse.com

  • Easley D, Kiefer NM, O’Hara M, Paperman JB (1996) Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks. J Finance 51(4):1405–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Kiefer NM, O’Hara M (1997a) The information content of the trading process. J Empir Finance 4:159–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Kiefer NM, O’Hara M (1997b) One day in the life of a very common stock. Rev Financ Stud 10(3):805–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Engle RF, O’Hara M, Wu L (2008) Time-varying arrival rates of informed and uninformed trades. J Financ Econom 6(2):171–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Hvidkjaer S, O’Hara M (2002) Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? J Finance 57(5):2185–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong K, Madhavan A, Swan PL (2001) Why do markets fragment? A panel-data analysis of off-exchange trading. Working Paper, University of Sidney

  • Glosten L (1994) Is the electronic open limit order book inevitable? J Finance 49(4):1127–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glosten L (1999) Introductory Comments: Bloomfield and O’Hara, and Flood, Huismann, Koedijk, and Mahieu. Rev Financ Stud 12:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein MA, van Ness BF, van Ness RA (2002) The intraday probability of informed trading. Presented at Annual Meeting of Financial Management Association 2003, Denver

  • Goodfellow C, Bohl MT (2006) The quality of floor and electronic trading systems directly compared: evidence from a natural experiment on the German stock market. Working Paper, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster

  • Goodfellow C, Bohl MT, Schiereck D (2008) Vorteilhaftigkeit des börslichen Abendhandels aus Anlegersicht. Kredit und Kapital 41(4):541–556

  • Gouriéoux C, Jasiak J, Le Fog G (1999) Intra-day market activity. J Financ Markets 2:193–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammig J, Schiereck D, Theissen E (2000) Informationsbasierter Handel über IBIS. zfbf—Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 52(November):619–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammig J, Schiereck D, Theissen E (2001) Knowing me, knowing you: trader anonymity and informed trading in parallel markets. J Financ Markets 4:385–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck J (1993) Assessing the quality of a security market: a new approach to transaction-cost measurement. Rev Financ Stud 6(1):191–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck J (1995) One security, many markets: determining the contributions to price discovery. J Finance 50(4):1175–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck J, Schwartz RA (1988) An assessment of stock exchange and over-the-counter markets. J Portf Manag 14:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautsch N (2004) Modelling irregularly spaced financial data: theory and practice of dynamic duration models, vol 539, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott T, Jones CP (2005) Island goes dark: transparency, fragmentation and regulation. Rev Financ Stud 18(3):743–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain PK (2002) Institutional design and liquidity at stock exchanges around the world. Working Paper, University of Memphis

  • Jain PK, Joh G-H (1988) The dependence between hourly prices and trading volume. J Financ Quant Anal 33:269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain PK, Siang CX, McInish TH, Taechapiroontong N (2003) Informed trading in parallel auction and dealer markets: an analysis on the London stock exchange. Presented at 14th annual conference on financial economics and accounting

  • Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53(6):1315–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan A (1995) Consolidation, fragmentation, and the disclosure of trading information. Rev Financ Econ 8(3):579–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan A (2000) Market microstructure: a survey. Working Paper: University of Southern California

  • Mayhew S (2002) Competition, market structure, and bid-ask spreads in stock option markets. J Finance 57(2):931–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInish TH, Wood RA (1992) An analysis of intraday patterns in bid/ask spread for NYSE stocks. J Finance 47(2):753–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInish TH, van Ness BF, van Ness RA (2002) After-hours trading of NYSE Stocks on the regional stock exchanges. Rev Financ Econ 11(4):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano M (1989a) Endogenous market thinness and stock price volatility. Rev Econ Stud 56(186):269–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano M (1989b) Trading volume and asset liquidity. Q J Econ 104(2):255–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reck M (2001) Call market mechanism on Deutsche Börse. In: Schwartz RA, Beiner N, Humbach MJ (eds) The electronic call auction: market mechanism and trading. Norwell, Dordrecht, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber PS, Schwartz RA (1986) Price discovery in securities markets. J Portf Manag 12:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims C (1980) Macroecomics and reality. Econometrica 48(1):1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theissen E (2001) Price discovery and screen trading systems. Working Paper, Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 35/2001

  • Theissen E (2002) Floor versus screen trading: evidence from the German stock market. J Inst Theor Econ 158(1):32–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theissen E (2003a) Organized equity markets. In: Krahnen JP, Schmidt RH (eds) The German financial system, pp 139–162

  • Theissen E (2003b) Trades anonymity, price formation and liquidity. Eur Finance Rev 7(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahal S (1997) Entry, exit, market makers, and the bid-ask spread. Rev Financ Stud 10(3):871–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood RA, McInish TH, Ord JK (1985) An investigation of transaction data for NYSE stocks. J Finance 40(3):723–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Voigt.

Additional information

We thank the Deutsche Börse AG for providing the data. We are grateful to António Cerqueirathe, Alexandra Hachmeister, Guo Ying (Rosemary) Luo, Mark van Achter, Dennis Vrecko; participants of the 4th PFN International Conference 2006 Porto, Portugal, the 34th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Economics and Finance 2007, Jacksonville, USA, and the 14th Annual Meeting of the Germany Finance Association (DGF) 2007, Dresden, Germany; 2nd Annual Conference on Market Structure and Market Integrity 2007, Toronto, Canada. Any remaining errors are, however, solely our own responsibility. A large part of this work was completed when Dirk Schiereck was Professor and the Endowed Chair of Finance at the European Business School and Christian Voigt was Research Assistant at the European Business School. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Deutsche Börse AG, any of its subsidiaries, or anyone else.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schiereck, D., Voigt, C. With or without you: market quality of floor trading when screen trading closes early. Rev Quant Finan Acc 34, 179–197 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-010-0164-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-010-0164-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation