Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why perfect being theology?

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I display the historical roots of perfect being theology in Greco-Roman philosophy, and the distinctive reasons for Christians to take up a version of this project. I also rebut a recent argument that perfect-being reasoning should lead one to atheism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselm. (1965). Proslogion (M. Charlesworth, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Aristotle. (1941). Metaphysics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle (W. D. Ross, Trans.). NY: Random House.

  • Augustine. (1982). Eighty three different questions (D. Mosher, Trans.). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

  • Augustine (1994a). Christian Doctrine. In P. Schaff (Ed.), Nicene and post-nicene fathers (F. Shaw, Trans.), ser. 1, v. 2. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.

  • Augustine (1994) The Trinity. In: Schaff P. (eds) Nicene and post-nicene fathers. Hendrickson Publishers, Peabody, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine. (1999). Retractions (M. Bogan, Trans.). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

  • Boethius. (1969). The consolation of philosophy (V. E. Watt, Trans.). NY: Penguin Books.

  • Cicero. (1988). On the nature of the Gods. In B. Inwood & L. Gerson (Eds.), Hellenistic philosophy: Introductory readings (B. Inwood & L. Gerson, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.

  • Hill D. (2005) Divinity and maximal greatness. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Leftow B. (2004) Anselm’s perfect being theology. In: Davies B., Leftow B. (eds) The Cambridge companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press, NY, pp 132–156

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maitzen S. (2005) Anselmian Atheism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70: 225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Origen. (1956). Letter to Gregory Thaumaturgos, tr. in The Ante-Nicene Fathers, v. IV. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

  • Pike N. (1969) Omnipotence and God’s ability to sin. American Philosophical Quarterly 6: 208–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1992). Republic (G. M. A. Grube & C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.

  • von Harnack, A. (1958). History of dogma (3rd ed., N. Buchanan, Trans.). NY: Russell & Russell.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oriel College, Oxford University, Oxford, UK

    Brian Leftow

Authors
  1. Brian Leftow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Leftow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leftow, B. Why perfect being theology?. Int J Philos Relig 69, 103–118 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9267-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9267-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation