Bajaj, V., & Maxon, T. (2005). Deal near for takeover of AT&T? Dallas Morning News, January 28. Web site: http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050128/news_1b28att.html
Baumol W., Sidak J. G. (1994) Toward competition in local telephony. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, S., & Luke, J. (2012). Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates from the National Interview Health Survey, July–December 2011. Web site: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201206.pdf
Breyer, S. (1999). AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board, 119 S. Ct. 721. Web site: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/525/366#writing-type-12-Breye
Cave M. (2006) Encouraging infrastructure competition via the ladder of investment. Telecommunications Policy 30(3–4): 223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. (2006). Costs of neutral/unmanaged IP networks. Review of network economics, 8(1), Retrieved November 7, 2012, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=90343
Crandall R. W., Waverman L. (1995) Talk is cheap. The Brookings Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service. (2011). Monitoring report, CC Docket Nos. 98-02, 96-45.
FCC. (1995). In the matter of price cap performance review for local exchange carriers, CC Docket No. 94-1, First report and order.
FCC. (2007). RBOC applications to provide in-region, InterLATA Services Under § 271. In the matters of section 272(f)(1) sunset of the boc separate affiliate and related requirements (and others), WC Docket Nos. 02-112 and 06-120, CC Docket No. 00-175, report and order and memorandum opinion and order. Web site: http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications
FCC. (2010). In the matter of preserving the open internet, broadband industry practices, FCC GN Docket No. 09-191, WC Docket No. 07-52, Report and order, released December 23, 2010.
FCC. (2011a). In the Matter of Jurisdictional Separations and Referral to the Federal-State Joint Board: Report and Order, CC Docket No. 80-286.
FCC. (2011b). Local telephone competition: Status as of December 31, 2011. Web site: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0614/DOC-314631A1.pdf
Griffin J. (1982) The welfare implications of externalities and price elasticities for telecommunications pricing. Review of Economics and Statistics 64(1): 59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman J., Tardiff T., Belinfante A. (1993) The effects of the breakup of AT&T on telephone penetration in the United States. American Economic Review 83(2): 178–184Google Scholar
Hausman, J. (1997). Valuing the effect of regulation on new services in telecommunications. Brookings papers on economic activity: Microeconomics (pp. 1–54). Web site: http://www.brookings.edu/about/projects/bpea/editions/~/media/Projects/BPEA/1997%20micro/1997_bpeamicro_hausman.PDF
Hausman J. (1998) Taxation by telecommunications regulation. Tax Policy and the Economy 12: 29–48Google Scholar
Hausman, J. (2000). Regulated costs and prices in telecommunications. In G. Madden & S. J. Savage (Eds.), The international handbook of telecommunications economics , Vol. II. (Chapter 12). Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
Hausman, J. (2002). Mobile telephone. In M. Cave et al. (Eds.), Handbook of telecommunications economics . North Holland. Chapter 13.
Hausman J., Leonard G., Sidak J. G. (2002) Does bell company entry into long-distance telecommunications benefit consumers?. Antitrust Law Journal 70: 463–484Google Scholar
Hausman, J., & Sidak, J. G. (2007). Telecommunications regulation: Current approaches with the end in sight. NBER. Web Site: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1256
Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC. (2000). 219 F.3d 744 (8th Cir. 2000). Web site: https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/219/219.F3d.744.96-3321.html
Kahn A. (1971) The economics of regulation: Principles and institutions, Vol. 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Kahn A. (1979) The Richard T. Ely lecture: Applications of economics to an imperfect world. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 69(2): 1–13Google Scholar
Kahn, A. (1984). The uneasy marriage of regulation and competition. Telematics, 1, 1–2, 8–17.
Kahn A., Shew W. (1987) Current issues in telecommunications regulation: Pricing. Yale Journal on Regulation 4: 191–256Google Scholar
Kahn A. (1987) Deregulatory schizophrenia. California Law Review 75(3): 1059–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn A. (1988a) The economics of regulation, Vol. 1. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kahn A. (1988b) The economics of regulation, Vol. II. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kahn A. (1992) Market power issues in deregulated industries. Antitrust Law Journal 60(3): 857–866Google Scholar
Kahn, A. (1993). Testimony before the State of New York Public Service Commission in the petition of Rochester telephone corporation for approval of proposed restructuring plan (Panel on Public Policy Issues with Robert W. Crandall), Case Nos. 93-C-0033 and 93-C-0103.
Kahn, A. (1994a). Affidavit: In the matter of price cap performance review for local exchange carriers, notice of proposed rulemaking, FCC CC Docket No. 94-1.
Kahn A. (1994b). Panel direct and rebuttal testimony before the State of New York Public Service Commission in the petition of Rochester telephone corporation for approval of proposed restructuring plan on public policy issues in support of settlement.
Kahn A., Taylor W. (1994) The pricing of inputs sold to competitors: A comment. Yale Journal on Regulation 11(1): 225–240Google Scholar
Kahn, A. (1996). Ask not the bells for tolls. Wall Street Journal, August 6, p. A14.
Kahn, A. (1997). Statement in support of The Southern New England telephone company’s proposed reorganization.
Kahn A. (1998) Letting go: Deregulating the process of deregulation. MSU Public Utility Papers, East Lansing, MIGoogle Scholar
Kahn A., Tardiff T., Weisman D. (1999) The telecommunications act at three years: An economic evaluation of its implementation by the federal communications commission. Information Economics and Policy 11: 319–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn A. (2001) Whom the gods would destroy, or how not to deregulate. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Kahn, A., & Taylor, W. (2002). Declaration: In the matter of AT&T Corp. petition for rulemaking to reform regulation of incumbent local exchange carrier rates for interstate special access services, FCC RM No. 10593.
Kahn, A. (2003). Regulatory politics as usual. Washington D.C.: AEI-Brookings Joint Center. Web site: http://www.aei.org/article/regulatory-politics-as-usual
Kahn A. (2004) Lessons from deregulation. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Kahn, A. (2005). Economic Justification for Telus’ Two-Facility Bright-Line Forbearance Test. Appendix 3 to comments of Telus Communications Inc. in Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission, Docket PN-2005-2.
Kahn, A. (2006). a democratic voice of caution on network neutrality. The Progress & Freedom Foundation. Retrieved November 7, 2012 from http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/ps/2006/ps2.24voiceofcautiononnetneutrality.htm
Kahn, A. (2007). Network neutrality. Washington D.C.: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper RP07-05. Web site: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=97351
Keynes J. M. (1936) The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Harcourt, Brace & World, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Laffont J.-J., Tirole J. (1993) A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Laffont J.-J., Tirole J. (2000) Competition in telecommunications. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Litan, R., & Singer, H. (2007). Slouching towards Mediocrity: unintended consequences of net neutrality regulation. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law
. Web site: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=94204
Mueller M. (1997) Universal service: Competition, interconnection, and monopoly in the making of the American telephone system. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Perl L. (1983) Residential demand for telephone service. National Economic Research Associates, Inc, White Plains, NYGoogle Scholar
Perl, L. (1985). Social welfare and distributional consequences of cost-based telephone pricing. (Paper presented at the 13th annual telecommunications policy research conference, Airlie House, Virginia).
Posner R. A. (1975) The social costs of monopoly and regulation. The Journal of Political Economy 83(4): 807–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sichter, J. (1977). Separations procedures in the telephone industry: The historical origins of a public policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Program on Information Resources, Publication P-77-2.
Taylor L. (1994) Telecommunications demand in theory and practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin P. (1987) The fall of the bell system. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice. (1980). US v. AT&T, CA No. 74-1698, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. of Columbia, Plaintiff’s third statement of contentions and proof. Quoted in Temin (1987, p. 357).
Weinhaus C., Oettinger A. (1988) Behind the telephone debates. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New JerseyGoogle Scholar