Abstract
Regulation fostering Managed Care alternatives in health insurance is spreading. This work reports on an experiment designed to measure the amounts of compensation asked by the Swiss population (in terms of reduced premiums) for Managed-Care type restrictions in the provision of health care. It finds that restrictions on the freedom of physician choice would require an average compensation of more than one-third of the premium, while generic substitution even meets with a small willingness to pay. Marked preference heterogeneity is an argument against regulation imposing uniformity of contract in Swiss social health insurance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Andreoni (1995) ArticleTitleWarm-glow vs. cold-prickle: the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 IssueID1 1–21
K. J. Arrow (1971) Essay in the theory of risk bearing North Holland Amsterdam
M. E. Ben-Akiva S. R. Lerman (1985) Discrete choice analysis MIT Press Cambridge, London
P. Cattin D. R. Wittink (1982) ArticleTitleCommercial use of conjoint analysis: a survey Journal of Marketing 46 44–53
D. M. Cutler (2002) ArticleTitleEquality, efficiency, and market fundamental: the dynamics of international medical-care reform Journal of Economic Literature XL IssueID3 881–906
A. Gustafson A. Herrmann F. Huber (2000) Conjoint analysis as an instrument of market research practice A. Gustafsson A. Herrmann F. Huber (Eds) Conjoint measurement: methods and applications Springer Heidelberg and New York 5–46
D. Gyrd-Hansen U. Slothuus (2002) ArticleTitleThe citizen’s preferences for financing public health care: a danish survey International Journal of Health Care Finance & Economics 2 IssueID1 25–36
W. M. Hanemann (1983) ArticleTitleMarginal welfare measures for discrete choice models Economics Letters 13 129–136 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-1765(83)90074-5
R. H. Hardin N. J. A. Sloane (1993) ArticleTitleA new approach to the construction of optimal designs Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 37 229–369 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0378-3758(93)90112-J
Hardin, R. H., & Sloane, N. J. A. (1994). Operating manual for gosset: a general purpose program for constructing experimental designs, 2nd edition. http://www.research.att.com/~njas/gosset/.
A. S. Hedayat N. J. A. Sloane J. Stufken (1999) Orthogonal arrays. theory and applications Springer New York, Berlin, Heidelberg
InstitutionalAuthorNameInterstudy (2003) HMO industry report Interstudy St. Paul, MA
F. R. Johnson W. H. Desvousges (1997) ArticleTitleEstimating stated preferences with rated-pair data: environmental, health, and employment effects of energy programs Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34 79–99 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.1997.1002
W. F. Kuhfeld R. D. Tobias M. Garratt (1994) ArticleTitleEfficient experimental design with marketing research applications Journal of Marketing Research 31 545–557
K. Lancaster (1966) ArticleTitleA new approach to consumer theory Journal of Political Economy 74 132–157
Hj. Lehmann P. Zweifel (2004) ArticleTitleInnovation and risk selection in deregulated social health insurance Journal of Health Economics 23 997–1012 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.12.007
J. J. Louviere D. A. Hensher J. D. Swait (2000) Stated choice methods—analysis and application Cambridge University Press Cambridge
D. McFadden (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior P. Zarembka (Eds) Frontiers in econometrics Academic Press New York 105–142
R. C. Mitchell R. T. Carson (1989) Using survey to value public goods, the contingent valuation method Resources for the Future Washington, DC
OECD (2003). OECD Health Data, Paris.
M. Ryan J. Hughes (1997) ArticleTitleUsing conjoint analysis to assess women’s preference for miscarriage management Health Economics 7 373–378
InstitutionalAuthorNameSwiss Federal Agency for Social Insurance (Bundesamt für Sozialversicherung) (2003) Schweizerische Sozialversicherungsstatistik (2003)(Statistics of Swiss Social Insurance) EDMZ Bern
H. Telser S. Vaterlaus P. Zweifel P. Eugster (2004) Was leistet unser Gesundheitswesen? (What performance our healthcare system?) Rüegger Zurich
H. Telser P. Zweifel (2002) ArticleTitleMeasuring willingness-to-pay for risk reduction: an application of conjoint analysis Health Economics 11 129–139 Occurrence Handle10.1002/hec.653
P. Zweifel F. Breyer (1997) Health economics Oxford University Press New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zweifel, P., Telser, H. & Vaterlaus, S. Consumer Resistance Against Regulation: The Case of Health Care. J Regul Econ 29, 319–332 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-7402-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-7402-8