Skip to main content
Log in

Orthographic facilitation of first graders’ vocabulary learning: does directing attention to print enhance the effect?

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Orthographic facilitation refers to the boost in vocabulary learning that is provided when spellings are shown during study periods, but not during testing. The current study examined orthographic facilitation in beginning readers and whether directing their attention to print enhances the effect. In an experiment, first graders (N = 45) were randomly assigned to either an attention or no attention condition. They studied two sets of novel spoken words paired with pictures and spoken definitions, one set displaying spellings of the words beneath pictures, and one set with no spellings. Tests with no spellings present revealed that children learned pronunciations of words significantly better when spellings had been seen than not seen, and the benefit was still evident 2 weeks after training ended. Superior ability to spell the words by children who saw them showed that spellings were retained in memory to support learning. More advanced readers gained more benefit from spellings over no spellings in learning the words. However, drawing children’s attention to print did not boost memory for the words, suggesting that simple exposure was sufficient to activate grapheme-phoneme connections automatically and bond spellings to pronunciations of words in memory, even in beginning readers. Memory for the meanings of words was not improved by spelling exposure, possibly because children possessed no grapho-semantic mapping system comparable to the grapho-phonemic system to enhance the formation of connections between spellings and meanings in memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Omanson, R. C. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development: Implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 223–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M. A., & Cervetti, G. N. (2008). Teaching vocabulary through text and experience in content areas. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about vocabulary instruction (pp. 130–149). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, E. (1965). Vocabulary measurement: Techniques and major findings. Elementary English, 42(8), 895–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling, memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.819356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1979). The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 26–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell, H. K., & Justice, L. M. (2000). Increasing the print focus of adult–child shared book reading through observational learning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9(1), 36–47. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0901.36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganske, K. (1999). The developmental spelling analysis: A measure of orthographic knowledge. Educational Assessment, 6(1), 41–70. doi:10.1207/S15326977EA0601_4.

  • Ganske, K. (2013). Word journeys: Assessment-guided phonics, spelling, and vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jubenville, K., Sénéchal, M., & Malette, M. (2014). The moderating effect of orthographic consistency on oral vocabulary learning in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 12(6), 245–263. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L. M., & Ezell, H. K. (2000). Enhancing children’s print and word awareness through home-based parent intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9(3), 257–269. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0903.257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L. M., & Ezell, H. K. (2002). Use of storybook reading to increase print awareness in at-risk children. American Journal of Speech - Language Pathology, 11(1), 17–29. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2002/003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L. M., & Ezell, H. K. (2004). Print referencing: An emergent literary enhancement strategy and its clinical applications. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(20), 185–193. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2004/018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L. M., Kaderavek, J. N., Xitao, F., Sofka, A., & Hunt, A. (2009). Accelerating preschoolers’ early literacy development through classroom-based teacher–child storybook reading and explicit print referencing. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(1), 67–85. doi:10.1044/016101461(2008/07-0098).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kame’enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., Baker, S., Chard, D. J., Dickson, S. V., Gunn, B., Smith, S. B., Sprick, M., Lin, S. J. (1997). Effective strategies for teaching beginning reading. In E. J. Kame’enui & D. W. Carnine (Eds.), Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (pp. 53–92). Des Moines, IA: Prentice-Hall Inc.

  • Li, H., Zhang, J., Ehri, L., Chen, Y., Ruan, X., & Dong, Q. (2016). The role of orthography in oral vocabulary learning in Chinese children. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1363–1381. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9641-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R., & Norbury, C. F. (2014). Orthography facilitates vocabulary learning for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(7), 1317–1334. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.859714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinty, A. S., Justice, L. M., Piasta, S. B., Kaderavek, J., & Fan, X. (2012). Does context matter? Explicit print instruction during reading varies in its influence by child and classroom factors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 77–89. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengoni, S. E., Nash, H., & Hulme, C. (2013). The benefit of orthographic support for oral vocabulary learning in children with down syndrome. Journal of Child Language, 40(1), 221–243. doi:10.1017/S0305000912000396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, K. P., Ehri, L. C., & Lauterbach, M. D. (2016). Mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning in monolinguals and language minority English-speaking college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 46(2), 99–112. doi:10.1080/10790195.2015.1125818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1984). Limitations of vocabulary instruction (Report no. 326). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc.

  • National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (Report no. 00–4754) Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

  • Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–214). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, J., Bishop, D. M., & Nation, K. (2009). Orthographic facilitation in oral vocabulary acquisition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(10), 1948–1966. doi:10.1080/17470210802696104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, J., Dockrell, J. E., Patel, N., Charman, T., & Lindsay, G. (2015). Do children with specific language impairment and autism spectrum disorders benefit from the presence of orthography when learning new spoken words? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13(4), 43–61. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. C. (2008). The mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 175–191. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savaiano, M. E., Compton, D. L., Hatton, D. D., & Lloyd, B. P. (2016). Vocabulary word instruction for students who read braille. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 337–353. doi:10.1177/0014402915598774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonology and the self-teaching hypothesis. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 31–82). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., & Fairbansk, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-anayalsis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110. doi:10.3102/00346543056001072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2015). Incremental learning of difficult words in story contexts: The role of spelling and pronouncing new vocabulary. Reading and Writing, 28(3), 371–394. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-959-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizman, Z. O., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical output as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 265–279. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised. Circles Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan J. Chambré.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chambré, S.J., Ehri, L.C. & Ness, M. Orthographic facilitation of first graders’ vocabulary learning: does directing attention to print enhance the effect?. Read Writ 30, 1137–1156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9715-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9715-z

Keywords

Navigation