Skip to main content
Log in

Third and fourth grade teacher’s classroom practices in writing: a national survey

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A random sample of teachers in grades 3 and 4 (N = 157) from across the United States were surveyed about their use of evidence-based writing practices, preparation to teach writing, and beliefs about writing. Teachers’ beliefs included their efficacy to teach writing, their orientations to teach writing, their attitude about teaching writing, and their attitudes about their own writing. The teachers’ responses raised some concerns about the quality of writing instruction third- and fourth-grade students receive, as teachers reported spending only 15 min a day teaching writing and students spend only 25 min a day at school writing. While teachers indicated they used a variety of evidence based writing practices in their classroom, a majority of these were applied infrequently. Further, three out of every four teachers reported that their college teacher preparation programs provided no or minimal instruction on how to teach writing. They further rated their preparation to teach writing lower than their preparation to teach reading, math, science, or social studies. On a more positive note, a majority of teachers asked students to write multiple paragraph texts relatively frequently (4 times a month or more often) and complete at least one narrative, informative, and persuasive writing assignment monthly. Teachers were also generally positive about teaching writing, their efficacy to teach writing, and their beliefs about their own writing. Finally, efficacy to teach writing and philosophical orientations to teaching writing each made a unique contribution to predicting teachers’ use of evidence based practices, whereas teacher preparation did the same for reported time spent teaching writing and reported time students wrote at school and home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Applebee, A., & Langer, J. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, C., & Hiebert, E. (1985). A comparison of classroom writing practices, teachers’ perceptions of their writing instruction, and textbook recommendations on writing practices. Elementary School Journal, 86, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, C., Compton-Hall, M., & Cantrell, S. (1997). Classroom writing practices revisited: The effects of Statewide reform on writing instruction. Elementary School Journal, 98, 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, S., Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., & McVicar, R. (1989). Written language instruction for students with mild handicaps: Is there enough quantity to ensure quality. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, D., Farley-Ripple, E., Jackson, A., Wen, H., MacArthur, C., Jennings, A. (in press). Writing instruction in first grade: An observational study. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.

  • Copeland, C., & Rideout, J. (2011). Freshman English and theme-correxcting in Harvard College. Beaver Dams, NY: Silver & Burdett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, L & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman, B. R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M. N., Fletcher, J. M., Moats, L. C., & Francis, D. J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, (1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 222–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4–6: A national survey. Elementary School Journal, 110, 494–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A., Graham, S., Kiuhara, S., & Hebert, M. (2014). High school teachers’ use of writing to support students’ learning: A national survey. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1043–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2000). Should the natural learning approach replace traditional spelling instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1703–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Hebert, M. (2011). Informing Writing: The benefits of formative assessment. Alliance for Excellence in Education. Washington, D.C. (Commissioned by the Carnegie Corp. of New York).

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the common core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Elementary School Journal, 115, 498–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Cappizi, A., Kiuhara, M., & Hebert, M. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading & Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1015–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy in writing: A construct validation with primary grade teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(2), 177–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink, B., & MacArthur, C. (2002). Primary grade teachers’ theoretical orientations concerning writing instruction: Construct validation and a nationwide survey. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink-Chorzempa, B., & MacArthur, C. (2003). Primary grade teachers’ instructional adaptations for struggling writers: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012a). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012b). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H. (2009). Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: Investigating a multilevel cross-classified model. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(2), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, S., & Ro, Y. (2011). Approaches to writing instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 6, 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MDR. MDRtips: Myths in database marketing. http://www.schooldata.com/mdrdbsmyths.html

  • Moats, L. (2005/2006). How spelling supports reading: And why it is more regular and predictable than you may think. American Educator, Winter, 12–43.

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. Washington DC: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, A., Graham, S., Cunningham, J., & Harris, K.R. (2015). Teachers use of writing to support students’ learning in middle school: A national survey in the United State. Submitted to Reading & Writing: An International Journal.

  • Rogers, L., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 879–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. (2009). Stata multiple-imputation reference manual: Release 11. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M., & Wang, M. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The National Writing Project. (2010). Annual report 2010. Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/doc/about.csp

  • Troia, G., Lin, S., Cohen, S., & Monroe, B. (2011). A year in the writing workshop. Elementary School Journal, 112, 155–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Melvyn I. Semmel Dissertation Award and Special Education Endowment for Dissertation Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Brindle.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 14.

Table 14 Correlations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brindle, M., Graham, S., Harris, K.R. et al. Third and fourth grade teacher’s classroom practices in writing: a national survey. Read Writ 29, 929–954 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9604-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9604-x

Keywords

Navigation