Date: 31 May 2012
Meaningful reading gains by adult literacy learners
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To obtain a fuller picture of the efficacy of reading instruction programs for adult literacy learners, gains by individual students were examined in a sample (n = 148) in which weak to moderate gains at the group level had been obtained in response to tutoring interventions that focused on strengthening basic decoding and fluency skills of low literate adults (Sabatini, Shore, Holtzman, & Scarborough, 2011). Learners were randomly assigned to receive one of three tutoring programs for an average of 44 h of instruction. We used within-individual gains replicated over tests (WIGROT) as the method for identifying gainers, who were defined as students whose reading levels increased from pretest to posttest by a half year or more on at least two of four measured aspects of reading proficiency. The 46 % of the sample who met the criterion had higher pretest scores than non-gainers on measures of reading (d = .42, p < .01) and phonological awareness (d = .47, p < .01), and included fewer adults with a history of special education (43 vs. 61 %, phi = .19, p < .05), regardless of which instructional condition had been received. The findings suggest that basic skills instruction can lead to a meaningful degree of benefit for many adult learners who persist in reading programs for several months. Supplementing group level results with analyses of individual growth, such as WIGROT, appears to be useful in evaluating the efficacy of literacy interventions.
Alamprese, J. S., MacArthur, C. A., Price, C., & Knight, D. (2011). Effects of a structured decoding curriculum on adult literacy learners’ reading development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 154–172.CrossRef
Baer, J., Kutner, M., & Sabatini, J. (2009). Basic reading skills and the literacy of America’s least literate adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL) supplemental studies (NCES 2009-481). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Bowen, B. A. (1999). Four puzzles in adult literacy: Reflections on the National Adult Literacy Survey. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42, 314–323.
Calhoon, M. B., Sandow, A., & Hunter, V. (2010). Re-organizing the instructional reading components: Could there be a better way to design remedial reading programs to maximize middle school students with reading disabilities’ response to treatment? Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 57–85.CrossRef
Center for Applied Linguistics. (2001). BEST plus. Washington, DC: Author.
Conference Board, Inc., Partnership for 21st Century Skills, Corporate Voices for Working Families, & Society for Human Resource Management (2006). Are they really ready to work? (No. BED-06-Workforce). New York, NY: Author.
Corrin, W., Somers, M., Kemple, J. J., Nelson, E., & Sepanik, S. (2008). The enhanced reading opportunities study: Findings from the second year of implementation (NCES 2009-4036). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Dirkx, J. M., & Jha, L. R. (1994). Completion and attrition in adult basic education: A test of two pragmatic prediction models. Adult Education Quarterly, 45, 269–285.CrossRef
Engelmann, S. (1999). Corrective reading program. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw Hill.
Florida Center for Reading Research (2004). SRA corrective reading. Retrieved from http://www.fcrr.org/fcrrreports/pdf/corrective_reading_final.pdf.
Florida Center for Reading Research (2008). RAVE-O. Retrieved from http://www.fcrr.org/fcrrreports/pdf/RAVEOReport.pdf.
Fowler, A. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (1993). Should reading disabled adults be distinguished from other adults seeking literacy instruction? A review of theory and research. Technical report no. 93-7. Philadelphia, PA: National Center for Adult Literacy, University of Pennsylvania.
Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C., & Perin, D. (1997). Are word-reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and third-fifth graders matched for reading level? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262–275.CrossRef
Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C., & Perin, D. (2002a). Do adult literacy students make the same word-reading and spelling errors as children matched for word-reading age? Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 221–243.CrossRef
Greenberg, D., Fredrick, L. D., Hughes, T. A., & Bunting, C. J. (2002b). Implementation issues in a reading program for low reading adults. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45, 626–632.
Greenberg, D., Wise, J. C., Morris, R., Fredrick, L. D., Rodrigo, V., Nanda, A. O., et al. (2011). A randomized control study of instructional approaches for struggling adult readers. Journal of Research on Educational effectiveness, 4, 101–117.CrossRef
Hock, M. R., & Mellard, D. F. (2011). Efficacy of learning strategies instruction in adult education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 134–153.CrossRef
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.CrossRef
Jaffe, L. E. (2009). Development, interpretation, and application of the W score and the relative proficiency index (Woodcock-Johnson III Assessment Service Bulletin No. 11). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
Kirsch, I., Braun, H., Yamamoto, K., & Sum, A. (2007). America’s perfect storm: Three forces changing our nation’s future. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Kruidenier, J. (2002). Research-based principles for adult basic education reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Literacy.
Kruidenier, J. R., MacArthur, C. A., & Wrigley, H. S. (2010). Adult education literacy instruction: A review of the research. Washington, DC: National Institute of Literacy.
Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Boyle, B., Hsu, Y., & Dunleavy, E. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. (NCES 007-480). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
MacArthur, C., Konold, T. R., Glutting, J. J., & Alamprese, J. A. (2010). Reading components skills of learners in adult basic education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 108–121.CrossRef
McCardle, P., & Chhabra, V. (Eds.). (2004). The voice of evidence in reading research. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
Mellard, D. R., Fall, E., & Woods, K. L. (2010). A path analysis of reading comprehension for adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 154–165.CrossRef
Mellard, D. F., & Patterson, M. B. (2008). Contrasting adult literacy learners with and without specific learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 133–144.CrossRef
Miller, G. A. (1988). The challenge of universal literacy. Science, 241, 1293–1299.CrossRef
Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Sevcik, R. A., Steinbach, K. A., Frijters, J. C., et al. (in press). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities. doi:10.1177/0022219409355472.
Nanda, A. G., Greenberg, D., & Morris, R. (2010). Modeling child-based theoretical reading constructs with struggling adult readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 139–153.CrossRef
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
O’Shea, L. J., Sindelar, P. T., & O’Shea, D. J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 129–142.
Pratt, A. C., & Brady, S. (1988). Relation of phonological awareness to reading disability in children and adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 319–323.CrossRef
Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., Linck, W. L., & Sturtevant, E. (1994). Effects of fluency development on urban second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 158–165.CrossRef
Sabatini, J. P. (2002). Efficiency in word reading of adults: Ability group comparisons. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 267–298.CrossRef
Sabatini, J. P. (2003). Word reading processes in adult learners. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 265–294). London, UK: Kluwer.
Sabatini, J. P., Sawaki, Y., Shore, J. R., & Scarborough, H. S. (2010). Relationships among reading skills of adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 122–138.CrossRef
Sabatini, J. P., Shore, J., Holtzman, S., & Scarborough, H. S. (2011). Relative effectiveness of reading intervention programs for adults with low literacy. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 118–133.CrossRef
Scarborough, H. S., Cutting, L. E., Sabatini, J., & Pugh, K. (2009, June). Struggling adolescent readers: Effects of short-term intervention. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Boston, MA.
Shany, M. T., & Biemiller, A. (1995). Assisted reading practice: Effects on performance for poor readers in Grades 3 and 4. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 382–395.CrossRef
Shore, J., McNeil, A. N. K., Sabatini, J., & Scarborough, H. (2008, March). Creating and implementing an effective evidence-based fluency program for adult literacy learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, New York, NY.
Shore, J., Sabatini, J. P., & Bruce, K. (2006, April). Fidelity rubrics as a means for mentoring and training educators of adolescent and adult struggling readers: A professional development model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Smith, M. C. (1990). A longitudinal investigation of reading attitude development from childhood to adulthood. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 215–219.
Smith, J. R., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebanov, P. K. (1997). The consequences of living in poverty for young children’s cognitive and verbal ability and early school achievement. In G. Duncan & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Consequences of growing up poor (pp. 132–189). Russell Sage: New York, NY.
Venezky, R. L., Oney, B., Sabatini, J. P., & Jain, R. (1998). Teaching adults to read and write: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Wilkinson, G. (1993). Wide range achievement test 3 (WRAT-3). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
Wolf, M., Barzillai, M., Gottwald, S., Miller, L., Spencer, K., & Norton, E. (2009). The RAVE-O intervention: Connecting neuroscience to the classroom. Mind, Brain, & Education, 3, 84–93.CrossRef
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
- Meaningful reading gains by adult literacy learners
Reading and Writing
Volume 26, Issue 4 , pp 593-613
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Adult literacy