Abstract
In this article, a simplified iron/spinel catalyst system was adopted as the Fischer–Tropsch to light olefins (FTO) catalyst to rule out disturbances from efficient promoters (e.g., K or combination of S/Na). Supported by regular supports (e.g., Al2O3, carbon, etc.), unpromoted iron catalysts commonly have a maximum C2=–C4= hydrocarbon distribution below 28%. Supported by a composite oxide support (i.e., nominal composition, ZnAl4O7, calcined at 350 °C), our porous, unpromoted iron catalyst exhibits a maximum C2=–C4= hydrocarbon distribution of 40%, achieving a significant increase by ca. 42% in comparison with regular supports. Appropriate lifting of atomic Zn/Fe ratio, as well as, reducing at lower temperature plus mild carburization, both can make a supported iron catalyst more efficient in hindering C–C coupling and producing light olefins. The structure of ZnAl4O7 support remains stable in iron catalysts during CO hydrogenation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anchieta CG, Assaf EM, Assaf JM (2019) Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:9316–9327
Li Z, Xu H, Yang W, Xu M, Zhao F (2019) Fuel 246:466–475
Aydin ES, Yucel O, Sadikoglu H (2019) Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:17389–17396
Rezaei E, Dzuryk S (2019) Chem Eng Res Des 144:354–369
Hu J, Li D, Lee D-J, Zhang Q, Wang W, Zhao S, Zhang Z, He C (2019) Bioresour Technol 280:371–377
Hu J, Li C, Lee D-J, Guo Q, Zhao S, Zhang Q, Li D (2019) Bioresour Technol 280:183–187
Ma Q, Guo L, Fang Y, Li H, Zhang J, Zhao T-S, Yang G, Yoneyama Y, Tsubaki N (2019) Fuel Process Technol 188:98–104
Chein R-Y, Fung W-Y (2019) Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:14303–14315
Banke K, Hegner R, Schroeder D, Schulz C, Atakan B, Kaiser SA (2019) Fuel 243:97–103
Gai C, Zhu N, Hoekman SK, Liu Z, Jiao W, Peng N (2019) Energy Convers Manag 183:474–484
Torres Galvis HM, Bitter JH, Ruitenbeek M, de Jong KP (2012) Science 335:835–838
Torres Galvis HM, Koeken ACJ, Bitter JH, Davidian T, Ruitenbeek M, Dugulan AI, de Jong KP (2013) J Catal 303:22–30
Xing Y, Zhao C, Jia G, Fang S, Liu Z (2018) J Nanopart Res 20:202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4304-5
Zhong L, Yu F, An Y, Zhao Y, Sun Y, Li Z, Lin T, Lin Y, Qi X, Dai Y, Gu L, Hu J, Jin S, Shen Q, Wang H (2016) Nature 538:84–87
Jiao F, Li J, Pan X, Xiao J, Li H, Ma H, Wei M, Pan Y, Zhou Z, Li M, Miao S, Li J, Zhu Y, Xiao D, He T, Yang J, Qi F, Fu Q, Bao X (2016) Science 351:1065–1068
Cheng K, Gu B, Liu XL, Kang JC, Zhang QH, Wang Y (2016) Angew Chem Int Ed 55:4725–4728
Zhou W, Cheng K, Kang J, Zhou C, Subramanian V, Zhang Q, Wang Y (2019) Chem Soc Rev 48:3193–3228
Liu Z, Xing Y, Xue Y, Wu D, Fang S (2015) J Nanopart Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-2899-3
Hus M, Dasireddy VDBC, Strah Stefancic N, Likozar B (2017) Appl Catal B Environ 207:267–278
Prasnikar A, Pavlisic A, Ruiz-Zepeda F, Kovac J, Likozar B (2019) Ind Eng Chem Res 58:13021–13029
Dasireddy VDBC, Likozar B (2019) Renew Energy 140:452–460
Wang S, Wang P, Shi D, He S, Zhang L, Yan W, Qin Z, Li J, Dong M, Wang J, Olsbye U, Fan W (2020) ACS Catal 10:2046–2059
Su J, Zhou H, Liu S, Wang C, Jiao W, Wang Y, Liu C, Ye Y, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Liu H, Wang D, Yang W, Xie Z, He M (2019) Nat Commun 10:1–8
Ni Y, Liu Y, Chen Z, Yang M, Liu H, He Y, Fu Y, Zhu W, Liu Z (2019) ACS Catal 9:1026–1032
Zhou W, Kang J, Cheng K, He S, Shi J, Zhou C, Zhang Q, Chen J, Peng L, Chen M, Wang Y (2018) Angew Chem Int Ed 57:12012–12016
Xing Y, Jia G, Liu Z, Fang S, Zhao C, Guo X, Suib SL (2019) ChemCatChem 11:3187–3199
Iglesia E, Reyes SC, Madon RJ, Soled SL (1993) In: Eley DD, Pines H, Weisz PB (eds) Advances in catalysis, vol 39. Academic Press, New York, pp 221–302
Iglesia E, Reyes SC, Soled SL (1993) In: Becker RE, Pereira CJ (eds) Chemical industries, vol 51 (Computer-aided design of catalysts). Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 199–257
Liu Z, Xue Y, Wu D, Xing Y, Fang S (2015) Catal Lett 145:1941–1947
Yang W, Gao H, Xiang H, Yin D, Yang Y, Yang J, Xu Y, Li Y (2001) Acta Chim Sin 59:1870–1877
Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA, Rouquerol J, Simmieniewska T (1985) Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619
Liu Z, Wu D, Guo X, Fang S, Wang L, Xing Y, Suib SL (2017) Chem Eur J 23:16213–16218
Xing Y, Guo X, Wu D, Liu Z, Fang S, Suib SL (2017) J Alloys Compd 719:22–29
Xing Y, Liu Z, Xue Y, Wu D, Fang S (2016) Catal Lett 146:682–691
Liu Z, Wu D, Xing Y, Guo X, Fang S (2016) Appl Catal A Gen 514:164–172
Dalai AK, Davis BH (2008) Appl Catal A Gen 348:1–15
Chen X, Deng D, Pan X, Hu Y, Bao X (2015) Chem Commun 51:217–220
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 21571161), Special Funds for Basic Scientific Research Costs of Henan Provincial Universities (19KYYWF0402), Grant Program for Key Scientific Research Projects of Henan Provincial Higher Education Institutions (20A150044), and Research Funding for Ph.D. Faculty of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (No. 2016BSJJ034/CLY20170069/LZX2016) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xing, Y., Guo, X., Jia, G. et al. Investigations on the Zn/Fe ratio and activation route during CO hydrogenation over porous iron/spinel catalysts. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 129, 755–772 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-020-01751-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-020-01751-6