Introduction

Despite the trend to limit emissions of carbon dioxide to the environment ongoing for many years, the amount of CO2 emitted from human activities had increased from 35 billion tons in 2008 [1] to 35.9 billion tons in 2014 [2]. This shows that the reduction of CO2 emission is still an unsolved problem. The main reason for that is the high consumption of fossil fuels, which is related to the increase in world population as well as the growing consumption [3].

At the beginning of the twenty-first century, great hopes are placed in technologies related to carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). However, numerous studies have shown that these methods have major economic and environmental constraints, such as e.g. selecting the appropriate formation for injection. In addition, there is a lack of social acceptance for compressed CO2 transport and its geological storage. The proposed new technologies are related to the capture and utilization of CO2 (CCU methods).

Technologies using CO2 as a substrate are intensively studied now (the production of liquid fuels, DRM, methanation, production of ethanol etc.) [47]. Currently, the use of captured CO2 in industry is estimated to be ca. 5%. However, it is believed that the commercialization of new chemical processes can increase the utilization of the captured CO2 which could increase up to 10% [8].

Particularly interesting CCU abatement technologies are those that can also be used in the processes of storing energy in chemical products, such as the methanation of CO2 or the dry reforming of methane. The latter has attracted much attention as it allows the production of synthesis gas with the ratio of CO to H2 equal to 1, which is required for further chemical processing to fuels e.g. via the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis [9, 10]. The main problem of DRM is, however, the lack of an appropriate catalyst, which is active in this process and simultaneously resistant to carbon deposition [11].

Recently, a lot of attention has been paid to the study of to hydrotalcite-derived materials as possible catalysts for DRM [1218]. To improve the stability of the Ni-based catalysts, various promoters were proposed. Daza et al. studied the promotion of Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite-derived materials with ceria [1923] and showed that the final effect of Ce was influenced by the method of its introduction [21], loading (the optimal value was established to be ca. 3 wt% [19, 20, 23]), as well as hydrotalcite preparation method [22]. The Ce-promotion improved both the activity and stability of the studied materials. The beneficial effect on the stability may be ascribed to the presence of CeO2, which reacts with carbon deposited to produce Ce2O3 and CO2 [20]. Other additions studied as promoters to hydrotalcite-derived catalytic systems containing Ni in DRM included lanthanum [2426], cobalt [2729], rhodium [30], ruthenium [27] and zirconium [31].

In the present study, various cerium promoted Ni/Al and Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite-derived materials were studied. The catalytic activity of the unpromoted materials was presented in our previous work [32]. The goal of this study was to establish how ceria promotion influences catalytic activity of Ni/Al and Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite-derived catalysts in DRM. The properties of the prepared materials were mainly affected by the nickel content and the Ni/Mg molar ratio. However, as shown in previous work, Ce promotion turned out to determine the stability of materials via changing the activity and selectivity of the DRM process. Moreover, for the selected catalysts, which were considered a good representation of Ni/Al and Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite-derived materials, the effect of reaction conditions such as temperature and feed gas composition was also examined.

Experimental

Catalyst preparation

The catalysts precursor synthesis was reported elsewhere [32]. In short, five various Ni/Al and Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite-like materials were prepared with the value of molar ratio of divalent to trivalent cations in brucite layers fixed at 3. The samples were prepared by the co-precipitation method at constant pH. The nickel content was changed within the samples by the substitution of 5, 25, 50, 75 and 100% of Mg2+ by Ni2+ cations in the brucite-like layers in comparison to naturally occurring hydrotalcite mineral with chemical formula of Mg6Al2(OH)16CO3·4H2O. In this work, the obtained hydrotalcite materials were promoted with Ce species via adsorption from the aqueous solution of [Ce(EDTA)] complexes. In order to do that, hydrotalcite powders were mixed with the 3 wt% solution of [Ce(EDTA)] complexes for 24 h at room temperature. The exact procedure is described elsewhere [31, 33]. The Ce-promoted catalysts were calcined in the stream of air at 550 °C for 4 h. The designation of the catalysts includes the percentage of Mg exchanged for Ni, as well as the presence (or absence) of cerium promoter, e.g. HTNi25-Ce and HTNi100 refer to hydrotalcite with 25% Mg replaced by Ni promoted with additionally cerium present in the sample, and hydrotalcite, where all Mg was replaced by Ni without Ce promotion. The designation of the prepared catalysts and their nominal composition is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 The designation of prepared materials and details of the preparation procedure

Physicochemical characterization

The structure of cerium promoted catalysts was determined in this work and compared to unpromoted hydrotalcite precursors described previously in [32]. The catalysts obtained upon their calcination and after catalytic tests were examined by means of XRD experiments. The diffractograms were recorded in the 2θ range from 8° to 90° on Empyrean diffractometer from PANalytical, using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154059 nm). The catalysts’ elemental composition was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The ICP-MS measurements were carried out by “SCU du CERN”. The reducibility of the catalysts was evaluated by temperature programmed reduction of H2 (H2-TPR) on a BELCAT-M apparatus from BEL Japan equipped with a thermal conductivity detector. 50 mg of a sample was degassed at 100 °C for 2 h. The sample was subsequently reduced in 5% (vol/vol) H2/Ar from 100 to 900 °C at 7.5 °C/min heating rate. The BELCAT-M apparatus from BEL Japan was also used to evaluate the basicity of the materials by the temperature programmed desorption of CO2 (CO2-TPD). The measurements were performed for the reduced samples. The materials (60 mg) were first degassed for 2 h at 500 °C and then cooled to 80 °C. A mixture of 10% (vol/vol) CO2/He was then introduced for 1 h in order to adsorb CO2. A flow of helium was subsequently fed for 15 min to desorb weakly physically adsorbed CO2. The samples were further heated up to 800 °C under He flow at the heating rate of 10 °C/min, while the evolution of CO2 was measured with the aid of a TC detector. The textural properties of the catalysts were determined from low temperature N2 sorption isotherms obtained during experiments carried out on Belsorp Mini II apparatus from BEL Japan. Prior to each measurement, mixed oxide powders were degassed under vacuum for 3 h at 110 °C. Carbon formation during the DRM reaction was quantified using thermogravimetric analysis under air atmosphere. The experiments were carried out with a SDT Q600 apparatus (TA Instruments), under an air flow of 100 cm3/min with heating from ambient temperature to 900 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min.

Dry reforming of methane

The DRM catalytic tests for cerium promoted catalysts were carried out in the fixed-bed U-shaped quartz reactor heated inside a resistance oven. The tested catalysts were present in the powder form with the grain size between 0.09–0.16 mm. In a typical experiment 150–200 mg of catalyst was tested, depending on its bulk density. The temperature of the catalyst bed was controlled with the aid of a K-type thermocouple. The total flow of feed gases was controlled by a series of mass-low controllers (BROOKS) and was equal to 100 cm3/min, corresponding to the GHSV of 20,000 h−1. The products of the reaction were analyzed by an on-line Varian GC490 micro chromatograph equipped with a TCD detector. Prior to each catalytic test, a catalyst was reduced in the stream of 5% H2 in Ar for 1 h at 900 °C. The catalyst bed was then flushed with Ar and cooled down to the desired temperature (550, 650 or 750 °C) and feed gases were introduced. Most of the catalytic tests were carried out with the feed gas composition of CH4/CO2/Ar = 1/1/8. For a selection of catalysts, additional DRM runs were performed with the excess of CH4 (CH4/CO2/Ar = 1.5/1/7.5), the excess of CO2 (CH4/CO2/Ar = 1/1.5/7.5), the increased concentrations of both CH4 and CO2 in the feed (CH4/CO2/Ar = 1.5/1.5/7) and finally for direct methane decomposition (CH4/CO2/Ar = 2/0/8). The results of DRM tests carried out for the unpromoted catalysts under the same conditions were discussed in the previous paper [32].

Results and discussion

Physicochemical features of Ce-doped hydrotalcite derived Mg(Ni, Al)O materials

Table 2 shows the composition of various Ce promoted hydrotalcite-derived catalysts, as determined by ICP-MS analysis. A Ni content between 4–60 wt% was determined for the studied catalysts. Ni/Mg and M2+/M3+ molar ratios were in each case close to the nominal values assumed at the co-precipitation stage as discussed previously [32]. The Ce content in all samples decreased with the increasing content of Ni. In general, the adsorption of [Ce(EDTA)] complexes resulted in the introduction 1.4 to ca. 4 wt% of cerium species.

Table 2 Results of elemental analysis for ceria promoted catalysts

The XRD patterns acquired for the fresh Ce-promoted hydrotalcites, as well as the calcined HT-derived catalysts are compared in Fig. 1a and 1b with the unpromoted materials. Before calcination (Fig. 1a), all promoted and unpromoted materials showed a typical layered structure of hydrotalcite [3436]. The absence of any other additional crystalline phase in the diffractograms of Ni-HTs or Ni–Ce-HTs indicates first the successful incorporation of nickel cations into the brucite-like layers. Second, it confirms that the adsorption of [Ce(EDTA)] species (cp. Table 2) led to the good distribution of cerium on the catalyst surface, as confirmed by the absence of any cerium-containing phase in XRD. The unit cell parameters calculated for obtained hydrotalcites (Table 3) showed that there was no significant increase in the basal spacing between hydrotalcite layers (values of parameters c and c′), indicating that adsorption of [Ce(EDTA)] species did not result in ion exchange, and cerium species were most probably deposited on the external surfaces of crystallites. All values of c and c′ were within the range typical for CO3 2− (7.65 Å) and NO3 (8.79 Å) [34].

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD diffractograms for: a fresh hydrotalcites and b calcined materials

Table 3 Unit cell parameters and type of anions present in the interlayer spaces of hydrotalcites promoted with ceria (uncalcined samples)

The XRD diffractograms corresponding to the calcined catalysts (Fig. 1b), show two main reflections at 43° and 64° 2θ, ascribed to Mg(Ni,Al)O mixed oxides with periclase structure formed upon thermal decomposition of hydrotalcite materials [37, 38]. Additionally, for all Ce-promoted catalysts low intensity reflections observed at ca. 28° and 37° 2θ were registered, pointing to the presence of cubic fluorite structure of CeO2 (ICOD 00-023-1048). The intensity of this reflection increased with the decreasing Ni loading, suggesting that nickel content in brucite layers influenced the amount of cerium species that could be introduced into catalytic system via adsorption procedure.

The values of textural parameters i.e. specific surface area, SBET, total pore volume, Vtot, and mean pore diameter, dp, calculated from the N2 adsorption isotherms for different HT-derived catalysts promoted with Ce are compared with the unpromoted catalysts in Table 4. All values of textural parameters are typical for mesoporous hydrotalcite-derived mixed oxides [34, 39, 40]. The Ce doping did not significantly change the textural properties, since for Ce-promoted materials were at a similar level as for the parental ones, with the exception of the sample loaded with the lowest amount of Ni. As discussed before, the amount of introduced Ce species via adsorption was dependent on Ni/Mg molar ratio and was increasing with the decrease in Ni/Mg (see Table 2). Thus, one could expect that with the increasing amount of ceria species on the catalyst surface a partial blockage of pores may appear, leading to the decrease of SBET and Vtot. In the case of the two catalysts loaded with the highest nickel content (samples HTNi75-Ce and HTNi100-Ce), a small increase in the values of SBET and Vtot was observed, suggesting that for these two samples the ceria deposition was a source of additional porosity. This proves that the effect of ceria promotion is strongly affected by the Ni/Mg molar ratio.

Table 4 Textural properties of Ce promoted calcined materials and the total basicity for the reduced samples

Total basicity of the reduced samples was measured with the aid of CO2-TPD experiments. The results of the analysis are presented in Table 4. The ceria addition resulted in the decrease of total basicity for all catalysts. A similar effect was observed for HTNi25-Ce catalyst, as reported in our previous work [41]. It was observed, however, that the decrease of total basicity was compensated by the increase in the concentration of intermediate and strong basic sites, which are associated with Lewis acid–base metal–oxygen pairs and low coordinated oxygen anions (strong basic Lewis sites), respectively [40, 42, 43].

The H2-TPR profiles obtained for the catalysts doped with Ce are compared to the unpromoted materials in Fig. 2. All catalysts showed one asymmetric reduction peak, which was centered between 400–800 °C for the samples with high nickel loading and at 600–900 °C for the samples with Ni loadings lower than 20 wt%. The Ni/Mg molar ratio had an influence on the shape and maximum reduction temperature of the reduction peaks. The shift to higher reduction temperatures occurred with the decreasing nickel loading. This may be explained by the formation of smaller nickel crystallites with stronger interactions between the active phase and the support, as reported in [32].

Fig. 2
figure 2

H2-TPR profiles registered for Ce-promoted catalysts and their parental materials

The position of maximum temperature of reduction (Tmax) was dependent on the presence of the Ce-promoter as well. The shift was dependent on Ni content in the sample. Tmax was shifted to higher temperature for the ceria promoted sample HTNi100-Ce with the high nickel loading, indicating the decrease in catalyst reducibility after the small ceria addition. For the samples HTNi50-Ce and HTNi75-Ce, ceria addition practically did not influence reducibility. In contrast, the opposite effect was observed for the samples with Ni loading lower than 20 wt%, i.e. HTNi25-Ce and HTNi5-Ce. Tmax was shifted from 810 to 835 °C and from 780 to 820 °C for HTNi25-Ce and HTNi5-Ce, respectively when compared to the unpromoted samples. These results are in good agreement with those reported in the literature [1921]. The different trend for samples with or without Mg in its structure (HTNi100-Ce as compared to other catalysts) also suggests that the reducibility is an overlapping effect originating from the presence of both ceria and magnesium in the catalysts. In the absence of Mg in the HT-derived catalyst (HTNi100-Ce), reducibility increased. The increasing amount of Mg in the catalysts shifted the reduction peak to higher temperatures as compared to HTNi-Ce. However, the effect may have been additionally complicated by the fact that the content of magnesia is dependent on the Ni content.

The Ce-promoted catalysts exhibited additionally reduction peaks of very low intensity centered at ca. 250, 300, 415 and 600 °C. In this temperature region, the reduction process is quite complicated to explain since both processes of the reduction of NiO and ceria may have overlapped. The reduction of pure CeO2 occurs in three stages: (i) the reduction of surface oxygen or oxygen capping species (250–300 °C) [44], (ii) the reduction of surface lattice oxygen (450–600 °C) [23] and total bulk reduction up to 900 °C [21]. On the other hand, the reduction of Ni species from the framework of Mg(Ni,Al)O mixed oxides to metallic nickel is realized in two steps: (i) the reduction of surface NiO (ca. 420 °C) [45, 46] and (ii) the reduction of NiO strongly interacting with the support (600–800 °C) [18, 47]. As ceria species were introduced via adsorption, they are most probably deposited over Mg(Ni,Al)O mixed oxides phase, and thus the additional reduction peaks may be explained by the reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+.

Low temperature DRM with stoichiometric mixture of substrates

The effect of ceria promotion was first evaluated during isothermal DRM runs at 550 °C. The results of catalytic tests for ceria promoted catalysts are presented in Fig. 3 in comparison with the parental materials. The effect of the addition of cerium species was dependent on the content of nickel in the catalysts and the presence of magnesia. The Ce-promoted sample derived from Ni/Al hydrotalcite-like material (HTNi100-Ce), the sample with the high Ni content (HTNi75-Ce) and their corresponding parental materials exhibited higher conversions of CH4 than those of CO2. The conversions of CH4 higher than those of CO2 resulted also in the excess of H2 in the products of the reaction. The effect of ceria promotion for these two Ce-promoted catalysts was dependent on the presence of magnesia. Sample HTNi100-Ce exhibited increased conversion of CH4 with respect to unpromoted catalyst, suggesting the occurrence of direct methane decomposition. The magnesia containing catalyst (sample HTNi75-Ce) showed a decrease in activity when compared to the unpromoted catalyst. The opposite trend was observed for Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite derived materials with Ni contents around 20 wt%. In this case, the ceria promotion resulted in decreased conversions of CH4 but higher conversions of CO2 in comparison to the respective unpromoted catalyst. The sample with the lowest content of Ni exhibited decrease in both CH4 and CO2 conversions.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The comparison of catalytic performance in DRM at 550 °C of Ce-promoted and unpromoted catalysts. Average values registered during 5 h catalytic tests: a CH4 conversion, b CO2 conversion and c H2/CO molar ratio; GHSV = 20,000 h−1; CH4/CO2/Ar = 1/1/8; total flow 100 cm3/min

Ce-promotion influenced as well the distribution of the obtained products. The samples with the high and medium content of nickel (above ca. 32 wt%) exhibited the excess of H2 in the products of the reaction, while the HTNi5-Ce catalyst showed the opposite trend, with the excess of carbon monoxide. As reported in our previous research [32], the Ni loading influenced the occurrence of side reactions, CH4 decomposition and reverse water gas shift (RWGS). The former proceeds more easily with the increasing content of Ni, while RWGS is more developed over catalysts with low Ni content. Ce-promoted samples exhibited the same trends as the unpromoted catalysts (Fig. 3).

Reported in the literature thermodynamic limitations relevant to the conditions applied in this study for DRM at 550 °C showed that equilibrium conversion of CH4, CO2 and H2/CO molar ratio are respectively equal to ca. 87, 45% and 3.5 [48]. This suggest that at tested temperature direct methane conversion is well developed, leading to high production of H2 and much higher conversion of CH4 than CO2. Considering thermodynamic limitations and the results presented in Fig. 3, it may be seen that the CO2 conversions were close to thermodynamic limit for all tested samples. This effect was enhanced by the ceria promotion for HTNi25-Ce and HTNi50-Ce catalysts which exhibited higher conversions of CO2 than the unpromoted materials. Both the CH4 conversions and the H2/CO molar ratio were much lower than the equilibrium values, indicating that the applied catalysts changed the selectivity of the process and inhibited direct CH4 decomposition reaction. Moreover, this effect is strongly dependent on the presence of magnesia and Ni/Mg molar ratio. The Ce promotion enhanced this effect for magnesia containing samples.

For all catalysts, both promoted with Ce and unpromoted, the decrease in CO2 conversion was observed during the first 100 min of reaction (results not shown; for HTNi100-Ce and HTNi25-Ce these results are presented in Figs. 8 and 9), which may account, to a certain extent, for catalyst deactivation and loss of selectivity towards DRM. However, the positive effect of ceria promotion on the stability of the catalysts was observed, as CO2 conversions for Ce-containing samples stabilized within a shorter period of time than in the case of unpromoted catalysts. Moreover, CO2 conversions reached higher values for HTNi25-Ce and HTNi50-Ce than for the respective unpromoted samples. According to Daza et al. [23], the promoting effect of ceria is due to the Mg and Ce synergetic effect on CO2 adsorption capacity. As confirmed by CO2-TPD experiments, the HTNi100-Ce and HTNi75-Ce samples exhibited the lowest values of total basicity (Table 4), which was caused, among others, by the absence of magnesia in the catalyst structure in the former sample and the presence of only small amount of MgO in the latter. Therefore, the different effect of ceria promotion on the prepared catalysts may be explained by the lack of synergetic effect between Ce and Mg, which enhances the basicity of the material.

The XRD diffractograms obtained for the spent catalysts after 5 h DRM tests are presented in Fig. 4. All samples, with the exception of HTNi5-Ce, exhibited the presence of the reflections characteristic for graphitic carbon (2θ equal to ca. 26°), which was obviously formed during DRM tests. The intensity of this reflection, when compared to the parental materials, was dependent on the Ni content and the presence of magnesia. Ce-promoted Ni/Al derived sample exhibited higher intensity of the reflection originating form graphitic carbon than the unpromoted sample, while all Mg-containing materials showed the opposite trend. This clearly illustrates the positive effect of the co-existence of ceria and magnesia on the possible decrease in the formation of graphitic carbon on Ni/Mg/Al derived hydrotalcites.

Fig. 4
figure 4

XRD diffractograms registered for the catalysts after 5 h DRM runs at 550 °C

In order to determine the amount of the formed carbon deposits, TG experiments were performed for two selected catalysts (HTNi100-Ce and HTNi25-Ce) and the respective samples without cerium (Fig. 5). The mass loss for Ce-containing samples was higher than for the corresponding samples without Ce. The comparison with XRD patterns for the appropriate samples indicates that not only graphitic carbon was deposited on the surface. Apparently, other carbon forms are also present. This is additionally proven by DTG curves. The appropriate maxima are shifted for ceria promoted catalysts to lower temperatures—from 610 to 590 °C for HTNi100 and HTNi100-Ce, respectively, and from 575 to 555 °C for HTNi25 and HTNi25-Ce. This indicates that the Ce addition promoted side reactions other than CH4 decomposition, leading to the formation of different carbonaceous deposits with respect to the unpromoted catalysts. The possible reaction leading to carbon deposits could be reduction of CO2 with H2 to C and water. This could explain the increase in CO2 conversion for HTNi25-Ce catalyst compared to the catalyst HTNi25 (Fig. 3b). On the other hand, as the decrease in CO2 conversion and higher deposition of coke was observed for HTNi100-Ce sample, when compared to its parental, the carbon deposit for this catalyst might have been formed, to a higher extent, by disproportionation of CO.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Results of TG experiments performed for Ce-promoted catalysts and their parental materials after DRM tests carried out at 550 °C

It is worth mentioning that the addition of ceria for both HTNi25 and HTNi100 led to a shift of DTG peaks to lower temperatures, indicating that ceria promoted the oxidation of carbon deposits. The DTG peaks observed for all catalysts were centered at temperatures between 550–650 °C and was formed via the overlapping of at least two exothermic peaks, suggesting the formation of at least two type of carbon deposits, most probably amorphous and graphitic carbon [17, 49, 50]. The formation of the latter during DRM reaction at 550 °C was confirmed by XRD.

On the influence of reaction temperature

Catalysts HTNi100-Ce and HTNi25-Ce were chosen for additional catalytic tests at elevated temperatures (650 and 750 °C). The obtained results were compared to HTNi100 and HTNi25 [32]. The results of the tests at 550 °C and the materials characterization suggest that they are a good representation of Ni/Al and Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite-derived materials and, therefore, they were chosen for these additional DRM runs. The comparison of the catalysts performance, given as average CH4, CO2 conversions and H2/CO molar ratio as a function of temperature, is presented in Fig. 6 for Ce-promoted and unpromoted catalysts. The effect of ceria addition was the same for 650 and 750 °C. It resulted in decreased conversions of CH4 and increased conversions of CO2 with respect to unpromoted catalysts. Moreover, at 750 °C, the product distribution, i.e. values of H2/CO molar ratio, was the same for Ce-promoted and unpromoted catalysts. The effect of ceria promotion was more evident for sample HTNi25-Ce, which was loaded with higher ceria content, than for the HTNi100-Ce sample. The H2/CO molar ratio decreased in comparison to the parental material and the differences between unpromoted and promoted catalysts were decreasing with the increase in temperature. Over the tested temperature range, CH4 conversions were higher than CO2 conversions for Ni/Al derived catalyst. Similar results were obtained for HTNi25 sample at 550 and 650 °C. Only for HTNi25-Ce catalyst, the registered values of CO2 conversion were higher than those of CH4 at all three tested temperatures, suggesting that Ce addition to HTNi25 resulted in the promotion of RWGS reaction, influencing the distribution of the obtained products in this way.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Catalytic tests over Ce-promoted catalysts at 550, 650 and 750 °C in comparison to unpromoted samples. The average values of CH4 (a) and CO2 conversions (b) and H2/CO molar ratio (c) registered during isothermal 5 h TOS DRM runs; GHSV = 20,000 h−1; CH4/CO2/Ar = 1/1/8; total flow 100 cm3/min

The XRD diffractograms registered for the samples after 5 h of tests at 650 and 750 °C are compared to those after the test at 550 °C in Fig. 7. All catalysts exhibited a reflection at 2θ equal to 26° characteristic of graphitic carbon. Its intensity decreased with the increase in temperature, pointing to the decrease in carbon formation. For the HNi25 and HNi25-Ce catalysts, no graphitic carbon was registered after the tests at 750 °C. Moreover, comparing the respective Ce-promoted catalyst and HTNi25 sample, the lower intensity of graphitic reflection may be observed for the former, indicating that the ceria addition resulted either in the inhibition of the formation of graphitic carbon or faster removal in situ due to a side reaction (reverse Boudouard reaction). Graphitic carbon is considered to be inactive in DRM and hard to oxidize, while amorphous carbon deposits may be oxidized upon DRM contributing to syngas production in this way [49, 50]. Therefore, although Ce promotion resulted in the formation of higher amounts of coke deposits, it also influenced the type of carbonaceous species formed on the catalyst surface, and, as a final result, had a positive effect on the catalyst performance. Interestingly, the HTNi25-Ce catalyst after tests at 750 °C showed the presence of reflections characteristic for the hydrotalcite structure, pointing to the occurrence of ‘memory effect’, which suggests that RWGS reaction was well developed over the catalyst tested at 750 °C and confirmed previously drawn conclusions.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The XRD patterns recorded for the spent catalysts after DRM runs at 550, 650 and 750 °C for Ce-promoted catalysts and their parental materials

Most DRM catalysts described in the literature suffer from deactivation due to sintering at the high temperature used for the reaction, as well as from carbon deposits [51]. In order to examine the possible sintering of active material, the nickel particle sizes of the reduced and spent catalysts, estimated using the Scherrer equation, are compared in Table 5 for the studied hydrotalcite-derived materials with or without the addition of cerium. It is obvious from Table 5 that the addition of cerium does not affect the tendency to sintering of Ni for the HTNi100 negatively, as proven by very similar Ni particle size after the tests at 550 °C. When HTNi25 and HTNi25-Ce are compared, the positive effect of the addition of Ce may be seen, reflected by the unchanging size of Ni crystallites for the latter after 550 °C test as compared to the reduced sample. For HTNi100, as well as for HTNi100-Ce spent catalyst after tests carried out at 650 and 750 °C Ni crystallites are even smaller than for the appropriate reduced sample, which might explain the observed reduction in the formation of graphitic carbon with the increase in reaction temperature (see Fig. 7). For HTNi25 and HTN25-Ce, this effect is rather small, though the tendency is similar. This suggests some redispersion of Ni crystallites and is rather difficult to explain at the current stage. The effect will need some more experimental data and will be addressed in more detail in our future work.

Table 5 The Ni particle size estimated for the reduced and spent samples after DRM runs at 550, 650 and 750 °C

On the effect of the feed gas composition

The Ce-promoted and the corresponding unpromoted catalysts were also tested in DRM at 550 °C with different compositions of feed gas, i.e. the excess of CH4, the excess of CO2 or higher concentrations of CH4 and CO2 in comparison to the tests carried out for CH4/CO2/Ar ratio of 1/1/8. Table 6 summarizes the results obtained during DRM runs with various feed gas compositions. Some general conclusions may be drawn by analyzing Table 6. The change in the dilution of the reagents (excess of CH4, excess of CO2 and excess of both CH4 and CO2) resulted in decrease of catalytic activity towards CH4 and CO2 with the exception of sample HTNi100-Ce tested over the excess of CH4 (Table 6; Fig. 8). Moreover, for all samples, excess of CH4 resulted in increased values of H2/CO. On the other hand, the excess of CO2 and the decrease in the dilution of reagents resulted in the decrease of H2/CO. These results are in agreement with thermodynamic predictions reported in literature [48].

Table 6 The average results of CH4, CO2 conversions and H2/CO molar ratio obtained during 5 h DRM runs over various feed gas compositions for Ce-promoted and corresponding unpromoted catalysts; total flow 100 cm3/min; GHSV = 20,000 h−1; temperature 550 °C
Fig. 8
figure 8

Catalytic tests over HTNi100-Ce catalyst in DRM reaction at 550 °C for different compositions of feed gas: a CH4 conversion, b CO2 conversion, c H2/CO molar ratio; total flow 100 cm3/min, GHSV = 20,000 h−1

The results of the tests carried out for HTNi100-Ce catalyst (Fig. 8) showed that the excess of CH4 in the feed gas had a positive effect on CO2 conversion, the negative effect on CH4 conversion and led to higher formation of H2 when compared to the tests with equimolar feed gas composition, which is in agreement with calculations of thermodynamic equilibrium reported in literature [48, 5255]. On the other hand, the tests carried out in the excess of CO2 in the feed caused a decrease in both CH4 and CO2 conversions. The distribution of the obtained products was also strongly affected by the feed gas composition and decreased with TOS for DRM runs carried out in the excess of CO2 and increased with TOS for tests performed in the excess of CH4.

Similar tests carried out for HTNi100 sample (Table 6) revealed that the excess of CO2 in the feed gas led to the promotion of CH4 decomposition and thus increased CH4 conversions. The Ce addition clearly inhibited CH4 decomposition and thus increased the selectivity of the process towards DRM, which is reflected in the registered values of H2/CO close to unity for the tests carried out in the excess of CO2.

The results of the tests performed for HTNi25-Ce catalyst are depicted in Fig. 9. Similarly, as for HTNi100-Ce, the excess of CH4 in the feed had a negative effect on the CH4 conversion. It, however, barely affected CO2 conversions, which were at a similar level after around 100 min TOS as for the tests carried out with the equimolar feed gas composition of CH4/CO2/Ar = 1/1/8. The presence of the excess of CO2 also caused a decrease of both CO2 and CH4 conversions and lowered the values of H2/CO. It is important to mention that the HTNi25-Ce catalyst showed the most stable performance when the excess of CO2 was introduced to the reactor. According to thermodynamic model calculations [48, 5255], the application of the excess of CO2 should have a positive effect on catalyst stability, as lower formation of carbon deposits should be expected. Additionally, Ce promotion may help to oxidize deposited coke via reverse Boudouard reaction. These two facts may explain the most stable performance of HTNi25-Ce catalyst in the tests carried out with the feed gas composition of CH4/CO2/Ar = 1/1.5/7.5.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Catalytic tests over HTNi25-Ce catalyst in DRM reaction at 550 °C for different compositions of feed gas: a CH4 conversion, b CO2 conversion, c H2/CO molar ratio; total flow 100 cm3/min, GHSV = 20,000 h−1

The change in the feed gas composition of CH4/CO2/Ar from 1/1/8 to 1.5/1.5/7 led to a decrease in CH4 and CO2 conversions, as well as a decrease in H2/CO ratios for all samples. For the sample HTNi100-Ce, the CH4 and CO2 conversions and the product distribution followed the same trends as in the tests carried out with CH4/CO2/Ar ratios of 1/1/8. Thus, the increase of methane and CO2 concentration in the feed gas had a negative effect on the performance of HTNi100-Ce catalyst. On the other hand, the test performed for HTNi25-Ce sample showed that the increase in the concentrations of CO2 and CH4 in the feed resulted in a more stable performance of the catalyst, as no changes in CH4 and CO2 conversions and H2/CO ratios were observed during 5 h TOS.

It is important to mention that in case of all catalysts the larger drop in CH4 conversions than CO2 conversions was observed when the excess of methane was used. This is also true for the Ce-promoted catalysts tested with decreased dilution of the reagents. For example the change in the feed gas composition from CH4/CO2/Ar = 1/1/8 to CH4/CO2/Ar = 1.5/1.5/7 resulted in the drop in CH4 and CO2 conversions of ca. 14 and 10% for HTNi100-Ce. The opposite effect was observed for all catalysts tested in the excess of CO2. This indicates that the CH4 concentration in the feed influences the occurrence of side reactions, mainly direct methane decomposition, which affects the distribution of the obtained products and accounts for the coke formation. Moreover, a change in the trend observed for HTNi100Ce-catalysts further proves that catalytic activity of hydrotalcite-derived materials is strongly affected by the presence of magnesia and Ce promotion.

Conclusions

The Ni/Mg/Al and Ni/Al hydrotalcite-derived materials were synthesized and subsequently promoted with cerium and applied as catalysts for syngas production in dry reforming of methane at 550, 650 and 750 °C. The characterization of the materials showed that Ce species were present as a separate phase on the materials surface. The proposed method of introduction of Ce species via adsorption from the aqueous solution of [Ce(EDTA)] complexes resulted in samples with various Ce loadings. The amount of incorporated Ce species was dependent on Ni loading and increased with the decreasing content of Ni. The reducibility of Ni species was affected by the content of both Ce and Ni, and additionally by the presence of magnesia. For all Ce-promoted catalysts the total basicity decreased in comparison to the unpromoted ones. However, the Ce promotion leads to an increase of the concentration of intermediate and strong basic sites, thus modifying catalytic activity towards the CO2 adsorption.

The catalytic performance of Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite derived materials promoted with cerium is dependent mainly on Ni content and Mg presence but cerium additionally modifies the activity, selectivity and stability of such catalysts in DRM. The activity of the prepared catalysts towards CH4 at 550 °C in DRM, as expected, increased with Ni loading. On the other hand, the Ni loading did not influence significantly the CO2 conversion. The presence of Ce promoter was found to strongly determine both the activity and selectivity of the prepared catalysts. The role of Ce promoter was influenced by the presence of magnesia in the catalytic system. When Mg was absent in the catalyst (the Ni/Al hydrotalcite-derived sample), Ce promotion resulted in an increase of the activity toward CH4 and a decrease of the CO2 conversion. For Ni/Mg/Al derived catalysts the effect of Ce promotion varied depending on both the content of nickel and magnesium. The latter had a significant influence on material basicity for both unpromoted and Ce-promoted catalysts. Magnesium also influences the activity of the prepared catalysts towards CO2, influencing the carbon formation reactions, which was confirmed by the characterization of the spent catalysts. Finally, the addition of Ce increased the total amount of deposited carbon with the simultaneous change in the type and amount of formed carbonaceous deposits from graphitic carbon, inactive in DRM, to amorphous carbon which may contribute to the production of carbon monoxide. Thus, the effect of Ce addition was found to be beneficial for materials stability in DRM.

Finally, two selected catalysts, chosen as representatives of Ni/Al and Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite-derived materials, were evaluated for other gas feed composition at 550 °C. For Ce-promoted Ni/Al and Ni/Mg/Al hydrotalcite-derived catalyst the excess of CO2 in the feed leads to a decrease of both CH4 and CO2 conversions. It is important to stress that at the same time, the catalyst stability is enhanced under these conditions. On the other hand, the excess of CH4 in the feed promoted direct CH4 decomposition increasing the CH4 conversion, the H2 production, but simultaneously also leading to the formation of higher amounts of carbonaceous deposits. The increase of both CH4 and CO2 concentration in the feed, led to a decrease in CH4 and CO2 conversions and to a higher catalyst stability.