Skip to main content
Log in

Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic study for palm oil catalytic cracking over Al-MCM-41

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Palm oil catalytic cracking over a mesoporous aluminosilicate material (Al-MCM-41) containing 5 % alumina was studied in order to evaluate the Langmuir–Hinshelwood (LH) kinetic parameters. The Al-MCM-41 catalyst was prepared by the sol–gel technique and was characterized by X-ray diffraction and nitrogen adsorption techniques. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area of the catalyst was found to be 1,278 m2g−1. A 400 mL stirred batch autoclave reactor was used for catalytic cracking of 100 g refined palm oil and 1 g catalyst at a reaction temperature ranging from 573 to 673 K. The pressure–time data at different reaction temperatures were analyzed statistically in order to minimize experimental errors in the recorded pressures, whereas the statistically predicted pressure data were used to calculate the kinetic parameters. It was found that the fitting quality of the statistical model data using the LH model is similar to that of the raw experimental data. However, the values of the predicted parameters are significantly different. The estimated activation energy from LH kinetics was found to be 87 and 112 kJ mol−1 calculated from statistical model data and raw experimental data, respectively. The predicted parameters obtained from statistical model data are found to be more accurate as the influence of experimental error is minimized prior to data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olusola J, Adediran M, Oluseyi A, Ajao U (2010) Processing of triglycerides to diesel range hydrocarbon fuels: easily practicable small scale approach. Energy Environ 21(1):1325–1342

    Google Scholar 

  2. Demirbas A (2009) Progress and recent trends in biodiesel fuels. Energy Convers Manage 50:14–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rutz D, Janssen R (2008) Biofuel technology handbook. WIP renewable energies, sylvensteinstr, 2nd edn. Germany, Munchen

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh S, Singh D (2010) Biodiesel production through the use of different sources and characterization of oils and their esters as the substitute of diesel: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:200–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Twaiq FA, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S (2003) Liquid hydrocarbon fuels from palm oil by catalytic cracking over aluminosilicate mesoporous catalysts with various Si/Al ratios. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 64:95–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yared I, Kurniawan H, Wibisono N, Sudaryanto Y, Hindarso H, Ismadji S (2008) Modeling of liquid hydrocarbon fuel production from palm oil via catalytic cracking using MCM-41 as catalyst. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 2:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prakash N, Karunanithi T (2008) Kinetic modeling in biomass pyrolysis—a review. Appl Sci Res 12:1627–1636

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guo Z, Wang S, Yin Q, Xu G, Luo Z, Cen K, Fransson T (2011) Catalytic cracking characteristics of bio-oil molecular distillation fraction. World Renewable Energy Congress 2011; Linkoping: Sweden

  9. Twaiq FA, Zabidi NA, Bhatia S (1999) Catalytic conversion of palm oil to hydrocarbons: performance of various zeolite catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:3230–3237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Charusiri W, Vitidsant T (2005) Kinetic study of used vegetable oil to liquid fuels over sulfated zirconia. Energy Fuels 19:1783–1789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ooi YS, Zakaria R, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S (2004) Hydrothermal stability and catalytic activity of mesoporous aluminum-containing SBA-15. Catal Commun 5:441–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoltze P (2000) Microkinetic simulation of catalytic reactions. Prog Surf Sci 65:65–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gal T, Lakatos BG (2008) Thermal cracking of recycled hydrocarbon gas-mixtures for re-pyrolysis: operational analysis of some industrial furnaces. Appl Therm Eng 28:218–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Demirbas A (2003) Fuel conversional aspects of palm oil and sunflower oil. Energy Sour 25:457–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kubatova A, Luo Y, Stavova J, Sadrameli S, Aulich T, Kozliak E, Seames W (2011) New path in the thermal cracking of triacylglycerols (canola and soybean oil). Fuel 90:2598–2608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Twaiq FA, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S (2007) Catalytic cracking of palm oil: kinetic study. Int J Energy Clean Environ 8:65–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang M, Chen H, Gao Y, He R, Yang H, Wang H, Zhang S (2010) Experimental study on bio-oil pyrolysis/gasification. Bioresources 5:135–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roelof L, Coetzer J, Pirow Engelbrecht J, Christo Crause J, Lin DK (2010) Statistical robustness study for kinetic models. Ind Chem Eng Res 49:2932–2942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilkinson GN (1961) Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochem J 80:324–332

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moffitt JR, Chemla YR, Bustamane C (2010) Methods in statistical kinetics. Methods Enzymol 475:221–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhatia S, Mohamed AR, Noor Shah AA (2009) Composites as cracking catalysts in the production of biofuel from palm oil: deactivation studies. Chem Eng J 155:347–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ooi YS, Zakaria R, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S (2004) Catalytic cracking of used palm oil and palm oil fatty acids mixture for the production of liquid fuel: kinetic modeling. Energy Fuels 18:1555–1561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vasanth Kumar K, Porkodi K, Rocha F (2008) Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetics—a theoretical study. Catal Commun 9:82–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fogler HS (2006) Elements of chemical reaction engineering, 4th edn. NY, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  25. Faundez JM, Garcia XA, Gordon AL (2001) A kinetic approach to catalytic pyrolysis of tars. Fuel Process Technol 69:239–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Biswas S, Sharma D (2013) Studies on cracking of Jatropha oil. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 99:122–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Melo ACR, Araujo AS, Silva EFB, Oliveira RM, Fernandes VJ Jr, Luz G Jr, Jr Luz, Souza SG (2011) Kinetic behavior of sunflower oil pyrolysis over mesoporous materials. Fuel Process Technol 92:1340–1344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support was granted by The Research Council (TRC), Sultanate of Oman (Project: ORG/EI/10/005). Catalyst characterization was conducted at CombiCat research centre (University Malaya, Malaysia).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farouq Twaiq.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Twaiq, F., Nasser, M.S. & Onaizi, S.A. Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic study for palm oil catalytic cracking over Al-MCM-41. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 112, 477–488 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-014-0701-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-014-0701-7

Keywords

Navigation