Measuring discretionary accruals: are ROA-matched models better than the original Jones-type models?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Discretionary accruals estimated from Jones-type models are elevated or depressed for firms with extreme performance. Kothari et al. (J Acc Econ 39:163–197, 2005) propose performance matching to address the issue, that is, to difference discretionary accruals estimated from Jones-type models for treatment and control firms matched on current ROA. This study shows (1) performance matching will systematically cause discretionary accruals of either sign to be underestimated, and (2) the measurement error will be negatively correlated with the true discretionary accruals. As a result, using discretionary accruals estimated with performance matching to test whether certain events induce earnings management will increase the frequency of Type II errors, and using them as the dependent or an independent variable in regression analysis will bias the regression coefficient toward zero. The results of our empirical tests are consistent with these predictions.
- Abarbanell, J, Lehavy, R (2003) Can stock recommendations predict earnings management and analysts’ earnings forecast errors?. Journal of Accounting Research 41: pp. 1-31 CrossRef
- Ali, A, Chen, T, Radhakrishnan, S (2007) Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44: pp. 238-286 CrossRef
- Ayers, BC, Jiang, X, Yeung, P (2006) Discretionary accruals and earnings management: An analysis of pseudo earnings targets. The Accounting Review 81: pp. 617-652 CrossRef
- Blouin, J, Grein, B, Rountree, B (2007) An analysis of forced auditor change: The case of former Arthur Andersen clients. The Accounting Review 82: pp. 621-650 CrossRef
- Botsari, A, Meeks, G (2008) Do acquirers manage earnings prior to a share for share bid?. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 35: pp. 633-670 CrossRef
- Cahan, SF, Zhang, W (2006) After Enron: Auditor conservatism and ex-Andersen clients. The Accounting Review 81: pp. 49-82 CrossRef
- Cohen, D, Zarowin, P (2010) Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50: pp. 2-19 CrossRef
- Dechow, P, Hutton, A, Kim, J, Sloan, R (2012) Detecting earnings management: A new approach. Journal of Accounting Research 50: pp. 275-334 CrossRef
- Dechow, P, Sloan, R, Sweeney, A (1995) Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70: pp. 193-225
- DeFond, M, Park, C (2001) The reversal of abnormal accruals and the market valuation of earnings surprises. The Accounting Review 76: pp. 375-404 CrossRef
- Ecker, F., Francis, J., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2011). Peer firm selection for discretionary accrual models. Working Paper, Duke University.
- Francis, J., Hanna, J., & Vincent, L. (1996). Causes and effects of discretionary asset write-offs. Journal of Accounting Research, 34(Supplement), 117–134.
- Francis, J, Yu, M (2009) Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review 84: pp. 1521-1552 CrossRef
- Holthausen, R, Larcker, D, Sloan, R (1995) Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19: pp. 29-74 CrossRef
- Jo, H, Kim, Y (2007) Disclosure frequency and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics 84: pp. 561-590 CrossRef
- Jones, J (1991) Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research 29: pp. 193-228 CrossRef
- Kothari, S, Leone, A, Wasley, C (2005) Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: pp. 163-197 CrossRef
- Larcker, DF, Richardson, S, Tuna, I (2007) Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. The Accounting Review 82: pp. 963-1008 CrossRef
- Lawrence, A, Minutti-Meza, M, Zhang, P (2011) Can Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics?. The Accounting Review 86: pp. 259-286 CrossRef
- Louis, H, Robinson, D, Sbaraglia, A (2008) An integrated analysis of the association between accrual disclosure and the abnormal accrual anomaly. Review of Accounting Studies 13: pp. 23-54 CrossRef
- Matsumoto, D (2002) Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review 77: pp. 483-514 CrossRef
- Menon, K, Williams, D (2004) Former audit partners and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 79: pp. 1095-1118 CrossRef
- Prawitt, DF, Smith, J, Wood, D (2009) Internal audit quality and earnings management. The Accounting Review 84: pp. 1255-1280 CrossRef
- Measuring discretionary accruals: are ROA-matched models better than the original Jones-type models?
Review of Accounting Studies
Volume 19, Issue 2 , pp 736-768
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Earnings management
- Performance matching
- Jones-type models
- Industry Sectors