Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross section of stock returns. Journal of Finance,
(4), 1645–1680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmer, E., & Ljungqvist, A. (2004). On the decision to go public: Evidence from privately-held firms. Working Paper, Texas A&M University and New York University.
Cook, D., & Kieschnick, R. (2005). On the timing of going public and going private transactions. Working Paper, University of Alabama and University of Texas at allas.
Doidge, C., Karolyi, A., & Stulz, R. (2007). Has New York become less competitive in global markets? Evaluating foreign listing choices over time. NBER, Ohio State University, and University of Toronto Working Paper.
Engel, E., Hayes, R., & Wang, X. (2007). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and firms’ going-private decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
(1–2), 116–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., & French, K. (2004). New lists: Fundamentals and survival rates. Journal of Financial Economics,
(2), 229–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. H., Panchapagesan, V., & Werner, I. (2008). Off but not gone: A study of NASDAQ delistings. Working Paper, University of Delaware, Goldman-Sachs Group, Inc., and Ohio State University.
Hostak, P., Karaoglu, E., Lys, T., & Yang, Y. (2007). An examination of the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the attractiveness of U.S. capital markets for foreign firms. Working Paper, University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth, University of Southern California, Northwestern University, and The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review,
(2), 323–329.Google Scholar
Judge, E. (2006, December 13). America’s Alure Dented by Sarbanes-Oxley Law. TimesOnLine.
Kamar, E., Karaca-Mandic, P., & Talley, E. (2007). Sarbanes-Oxley’s effects on small firms: What is the evidence. Working Paper, University of Southern California School of Law, Harvard Law School, RAND Corporation.
Lehn, K., & Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance,
, 771–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuz, C., Triantis, A., & Wang, T. (2008). Why do firms go dark? Causes and economic consequences of voluntary SEC deregistrations. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
, 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, M. (2003). Why does IPO volume fluctuate so much? Journal of Financial Economics,
, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. (1998). Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance,
, 27–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2005). Rational IPO waves. Journal of Finance,
, 1713–1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotroski, J. D., & Srinivasan, S. (2008). Regulation and bonding: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the flow of international listings. Journal of Accounting Research,
(2), 383–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 19–23.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2008). Internal control over financial reporting in exchange act period reports of non-accelerated filers and newly public companies: Federal Register, 73
(26), 7450–7455.Google Scholar
Smith, P., & Cohen, N. (2007, January 2). Delisting wave hits London. Financial Times.
Vulcheva, M. (2007). Effect of regulation on companies’ delisting decisions: Evidence from the Introduction of IFRS by the European Union. Working Paper, Emory University.
Williams, R. (2000, June 2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometris,
, 645–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolner, A. (2006, October 13). What makes U.S. markets competitive (or not). Bloomberg.
Yang, Y. (2007). Do at-risk firms with good prospects manage accruals to avoid delisting. Working Paper, University of Texas at Austin.