Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Private Governance and the three biases of political philosophy

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Private Governance shows that philosophers, political and legal theorists, and social scientists mistakenly believe in legal centralism, the view that order in the world depends upon and is made possible by state law. In fact, most governance not only happens to be private, but must be private. This paper extends Edward Stringham’s argument by claiming that philosophers tend to suffer from three biases. Diffidence bias means they are overly pessimistic about people’s willingness and ability to cooperate without state enforcement. Statism bias means the overestimate the degree to which cooperation is secured by the state. Guarantee bias means they overestimate the value and need for legal guarantees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In conversation.

References

  • Brennan, J., & Jaworski, P. (2015). Markets without limits. New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., & van der Vossen, V. (2017). The myths of the self-ownership thesis. In J. Brennan, V. van der Vossen, & D. Schmidtz (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism. New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasnas, J. (2008) The obviousness of anarchy. Anarchism/Minarchism: Is Government Part of a Free Country, ed. R. Long and T. Machan. Surrey: Ashgate Press.

  • Hobbes, T. (1998 [1651]). Leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S., & Sunstein, C. R. (2000). The cost of rights: Why liberty depends on taxes. New York: W.V. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, G. S. (1995). Why even morally perfect people would need government. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. (2014). Anarchy unbound: Why self-governance works better than you think. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1924 [1690]). Two treatises of government. London: J.M. Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringham, P. E. (2015). Private governance: Creating order in economic and social life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Brennan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brennan, J. Private Governance and the three biases of political philosophy. Rev Austrian Econ 31, 235–243 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-017-0384-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-017-0384-1

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation