Skip to main content
Log in

Securitization and regulatory arbitrage within the ABCT framework

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the consequences of securitization and how it links to the Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT). The argument that securitization is behind fiduciary credit expansion preceding the 2008 crisis is incomplete. Consolidated balance sheet analysis demonstrates that securitization per se actually sterilizes the inflationary effect of previous fiduciary credits by transforming them into credits backed by voluntary savings. This sterilization stage is subsequently followed by new fiduciary credits issuance as securitization creates excess reserves and excess capital for banks. However, when securitization is used as a tool to implement arbitrage strategies of the Basel prudential rules, it enables banks to create more fiduciary credit while time preference remains unchanged. This creates the conditions for business cycle amplification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Assuming a reserve requirement liquidity ratio r req then the basic multiplier is given by the following equation:

    $$ Bank\ Multiplier=\frac{1}{r_{req}} $$
    (1)

    A more risk-averse banker might include, on top of required reserves, the corresponding currency drain ratio (r drain ) from deposits. Consequently, the bank multiplier equation becomes:

    $$ Bank\ Multiplier=\frac{1+{r}_{drain}}{r_{req}+{r}_{drain}} $$
    (2)
  2. Of this, 4 % should be core capital (tier 1) while the other 4 % could be composed of supplementary capital (tier 2). Core capital consists of common stock and retained earnings, as well as any other accumulated income and disclosed reserves. Supplementary capital essentially concerns undisclosed reserves, general provisions for losses, subordinated debt, and preferred stock. The Basel capital ratio requirement is given as:

    $$ {b}_{req}=0.08=\frac{capital}{risk- weighted\ assets}=\frac{tier\ 1+ tier\ 2}{risk- weighted\ assets} $$
    (3)

    In the United States, a 10 % ratio has been in practice ever since 2000 (Friedman and Kraus 2011, pp. 65, 180). See Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2011, 2013) for detailed information on forthcoming regulation—that is, Basel III—concerning capital and leverage ratios.

  3. Indeed, most OCDE countries propose a national guarantee of deposits (e.g., $250,000 e in the United States through the FDIC, and €100,000 in the Eurozone). The failure of a bank implies resorting to public funds to honor that guarantee.

  4. The Basel II agreements identify three kinds of risk, namely, credit risk, market risk, and operational risk. For more on Basel II, see Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2005).

  5. Here follows the calculation of Bank Alpha’s weighted assets according to the risk-weights given in Table 1:

    $$ \begin{array}{l} Risk\ weighted\ assets=\left[\left( Cash+ Tbonds\right)\times 0\right]+\left[ Mortgages \times 0.5\right]+\left[ Commercial\ Loans\times 1\right]\\ {}\kern6em =\left(30\ million+20\ million\right)\times 0+100\ million\times 0.5+100\ million\times 1\\ {}\kern6em \underset{\bar{\mkern6mu}}{=150\ million\ dollars}\end{array} $$
  6. SPVs, though being a separate legal entity, are intimately linked to the banks originating the loans to be securitized. Indeed, those banks hold equity on the SPVs. Moreover, credit enhancements engaging the bank to provide guarantees to the SPVs’ assets give further links between banks and their SPVs. For more on guarantees see Acharya, et al. (2013)

  7. For more details on the terminology and the procedures relative to securitization, see Noeth and Sengupta (2011).

  8. It is important to note that this flow description implies that reserve requirement does not apply to interbank transaction. This is the case in most monetary systems such as the European one (Banque de France 2015).

  9. It is worth noting that this first stage is similar to the monetary reform proposed by Huerta de Soto (2006, pp. 715–812). There, bank depositors are given the choice to convert their deposits into mutual funds. This is actually a securitization operation of bank loans.

  10. The Recourse rule and Basel II provided a regulatory framework where credit rating agencies became its keystone as risk-weighting of assets (including securitized assets) was determined by a rating that was provided by them. While Basel II regulations were gradually being implemented in other countries, the Recourse rule in its turn was fully applied in the United States by 2001.

  11. This is an over-simplification of real world tranched-securitization schemes. Real-world structured ABS funds are more complex since they include more varied-rated tranches. However, our example still clings well to reality in terms of the proportions of the AAA-rated and lower-rated tranches. For a more realistic though complex and time-consuming description of tranched securitization, see Ashcraft and Schuermann (2008).

  12. Here follows the calculation of weighted assets according to the weighting given in footnote 5 and the figures in Fig. 4:

    $$ \begin{array}{l} Riskweighted\ assets\hfill \\ {}=\left[\left( Cash+ Tbonds\right)\times 0\right]+\left[ Mortgages \times 0.5\right]+\left[ Commercial\ Loans\times 1\right]+\left[MBS\ (AAA)\right]\hfill \\ {}\kern6em \times 20\% + \left[MBS\ (A)\right]\times 50\%+\left[MBS\ (Equity)\right]\times 1250\%=\underset{\bar{\mkern6mu}}{\$1233.8\ billion}\hfill \end{array} $$
  13. Moreover, the greater the width of the AAA-rated tranches, the greater is the economy of capital for the securitizing bank. This highlights the importance of the rating agencies in the subprime crisis. For more on this point, see White (2009).

References

  • Acharya, V., & Richardson, M. (2009). Causes of the financial crisis. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 21(2–3), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, V., Schnabl, P., & Suarez, G. (2013). Securitization without risk transfer. Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3), 515–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altunbas, Y., Gambacorta, L., & Marqués-Ibañez, D. (2009). Securitisation and the bank lending channel. European Economic Review, 53(8), 996–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, B. W., Lacour-Little, M., & Sanders, A. B. (2005). Does regulatory capital arbitrage, reputation, or asymmetric Information drive securitization? Journal of Financial Services Research, 28, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, A., & Schuermann, T. (2008). Understanding the securitization of subprime mortgage credit (No. 318). New York: noW Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Financial Markets in Europe. (2015). AFME Securitisation Data Report, Fourth Quarter 2014. [Online] Available at: http://www.sifma.org/research/item.aspx?id=8589953866. Accessed 20 April 2015.

  • Banque de France. (2015). Réserves obligatoires. [Online] Available at: https://www.banque-france.fr/politique-monetaire/reglementation-et-mise-en-oeuvre-de-la-politique-monetaire/mise-en-oeuvre-de-la-politique-monetaire/reserves-obligatoires-presentation-assiettes-calendriers.html. Accessed 16 January 2015.

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (1988). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. Basel: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2005). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: a revised framework. Basel: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2011). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Basel: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2013). Basel III: The liquidity coverage ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools. Basel: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2014). Basel III document: Revisions to the securitisation framework. Basel: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. S. (2012). Some reflections on the crisis and the policy response. Remarks delivered at the Russell Sage Foundation and Century Foundation Conference on “Rethinking Finance,” New York City.

  • Bhidé, A. (2009). An accident waiting to happen. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 21(2–3), 211–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borio, C., & Disyatat, P. (2010). Unconventional monetary policies: an appraisal. The Manchester School, 78(S1), 53–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprio, G., Demigürç-Kunt, A., & Kane, E. J. (2010). The 2007 meltdown in structured securitization searching for lessons not scapegoats. World Bank Research Observer, 25, 125–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Ariccia, G., Igan, D., & Laeven, L. (2012). Credit boom and lending standards: evidence from the subprime mortgage market. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(2–3), 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrella, A. (2002). Securitization and the efficacy of monetary policy. Economic Policy Review, 8(1), 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (2007). Federal Register, 72(235), 69288–69445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, V. (2010). Regulatory arbitrage. Texas Law Review, 89, 227–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., & Kraus, W. (2011). Engineering the financial crisis: Systemic risk and the failure of regulation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B. M. & Kuttner, K. N. (2010). Implementation of central bank policy: how central banks set interest rates?. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, Issue w16165.

  • Gertchev, N. (2009). Securitization and fractional reserve banking. In J. G. Hülsmann & S. Kinsella (Eds.), Property, freedom, and society: Essays in honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe (pp. 283–300). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez Roche, G. A. (2015). Entrepreneurial ignition of business cycles: the corporate finance of malinvestment. The Review of Austrian Economics.

  • Goodhart, C. A. E. (2008). The regulatory response to the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Stability, 4(4), 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, G. (2010). Slapped by the invisible hand: The panic of 2007. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huerta de Soto, J. (2006). Money, bank credit, and economic cycles (2nd ed.). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablecki, J. (2009). The impact of Basel I capital requirements on bank behaviour and the efficacy of monetary policy. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 2(1), 16–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablecki, J., & Machaj, M. (2009). The regulated meltdown of 2008. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 21(2–3), 301–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. J. (2012). The inevitability of shadowy Banking. Atlanta, s.n.

  • Kindleberger, C. P., & Aliber, R. Z. (2005). Manias, panics, and crashes (5th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCulley, P. (2007). Teton reflections. PIMCO Global Central Bank Focus, Issue 2.

  • Mises, L. V. (1980). The theory of money and credit. Indianapolis: LibertyClassics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noeth, B. J., & Sengupta, R. (2011). Is shadow banking really banking? The Regional Economist, 10, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnoy, F. (1996). Financial derivatives and the costs of regulatory arbitrage. The Journal of Corporation Law, 22, 211–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozsar, Z., Adrian, T., Ashcraft, A., Boesky, H. (2010). Shadow Banking. s.l.:Staff Report No. 458, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

  • Stout, L. A. (1995). Betting the bank: how derivatives trading under conditions of uncertainty can increase risks and erode returns in financial markets. The Journal of Corporation Law, 21, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. J. (2009). The credit-rating agencies and the subprime debacle. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 21(2–3), 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the editors and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful critiques, comments, and suggestions that helped improve previous versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel A. Giménez Roche.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giménez Roche, G.A., Lermyte, J. Securitization and regulatory arbitrage within the ABCT framework. Rev Austrian Econ 29, 67–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-015-0317-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-015-0317-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation