Abstract
Long-run neutrality of money is an artifact of particular theoretical frameworks. We advance an alternative though not contradictory theoretical framework where monetary processes exert lasting real effects. Our framework holds without rejecting the classical equilibrium condition that nominal values are independent of economic realities because the two frameworks are non-commensurable. The real effects that we explore stem from the distribution of monetary injection among potential entrepreneurial experiments. The selected experiments influence the pattern of activity within society, which leads to changes in the standard given conditions of wants, knowledge, and expectations. These changes unravel into alternative paths of history.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
On Cantilon’s work in general cf. Brewer (1992), von Hayek (1985 [1931]), Higgs (1891, 1892), Jevons (1881), Murphy (1987) and Spengler (1954a, b). For the discussion of his monetary thought see Bordo (1983). For the discussions that put Cantillon’s ideas on monetary process into historical context see von Hayek (1967 [1935], pp. 1 ff), Humphrey (1984, 1991) and Marget (1966a, b [1938–1942]).
References
Abrams, B. A., & Butkiewicz, J. L. (2012). The political business cycle: new evidence from the Nixon tapes. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44, 385–99.
Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–73.
Arrow, K. J. (1974). Limited knowledge and economic analysis. American Economic Review, 64, 1–10.
Bertocco, G. (2007). The characteristics of a monetary economy: a Keynes–Schumpeter approach. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31, 101–22.
Bordo, M. D. (1983). Some aspects of the monetary economics of Richard Cantillon. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 235–58.
Brewer, A. (1992). Richard Cantillon: pioneer of economic theory. New York: Routledge.
Cantillon, Richard (2010 [1755]). An Essay on Economic Theory. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Clower, R. (1967). A reconsideration of the microfoundations of monetary theory. Western Economic Journal, 6, 1–8.
Coddington, A. (1975). Review: creaking semaphore and beyond: a consideration of shackle’s ‘epistemics and economics. British Journal the Philosophy of Science, 26, 151–63.
Cowan, R., & Rizzo, M. (1996). The genetic-causal tradition and modern economic theory. Kyklos, 49, 273–317.
D’Arista, J. (2009). The evolving international monetary system. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 633–52.
De Grauwe, P. (2010). Top-down versus bottom-up macroeconomics. CESifo Economic Studies, 56, 465–97.
Feldmann, H. (2006). Credit market regulation and labor market performance around the world. Kyklos, 59, 497–525.
Foster, A. D., & Rosenweig, M. R. (1995). Learning by doing and learning from others. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 1176–1209.
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grice-Hutchinson, M. (1978). Early economic thought in Spain, 1177–1740. London: Allen & Unwin.
Haselmann, R., & Wachtel, P. (2010). Institutions and bank behavior: legal environment, legal perception, and the composition of bank lending. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42, 965–84.
Hayek, Friedrich August von (1985 [1931]). Richard Cantillon. Journal of Libertarian Studies 7: 217–47.
Higgs, H. (1891). Richard Cantillon. The Economic Journal, 1, 262–91.
Higgs, H. (1892). Cantillon’s place in economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 6, 436–456.
Hughes, J. R. T. (1977). The governmental habit. New York: Basic Books.
Humphrey, Thomas M. (1984). On nonneutral relative price effects in monetarist thought: some Austrian misconceptions. Federal ReserveBank of Richmond Economic Review 13–19.
Humphrey, Thomas M. (1991). Nonneutrality of money in classical monetary thought. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Review 3–15.
Jevons, W. S. (1881). Richard Cantillon and the nationality of political economy. Contemporary Review, 39, 61–80.
Katzner, D. (1998). Time, ignorance, and uncertainty in economic models. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lachmann, L. M. (1978). Macro-economic thinking and the market economy. Menlo Park: Institute for Humane Studies. 1973.
Lachmann, L. M. (1986). The market as an economic process. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Lastrapes, W. D. (2006). Inflation and the distribution of relative prices: the role of productivity and money supply shocks. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 38, 2159–2198.
Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. London: Routledge.
Lawson, T. (2003). Reorienting economics. London: Routledge.
Lewis, P. (Ed.). (2004). Transforming economics. London: Routledge.
Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.
Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1996). Nobel lecture: monetary neutrality. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 661–82.
Marget, A. W. (1966a [1938–1942]). The Theory of Prices: A Re-Examination of the Central Problems of Monetary Theory, Volume I. New York:Augustus M. Kelley.
Marget, A. W. (1966b [1938–1942]). The Theory of Prices: A Re-Examination of the Central Problems of Monetary Theory, Volume II. New York:Augustus M. Kelley.
Meltzer, A. H. (2011). Politics and the fed. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58, 39–48.
Morgenstern, O. (1972). Thirteen critical points in contemporary economic theory: an interpretation. Journal of Economic Literature, 10, 1163–1189.
Murphy, A. E. (1987). Richard Cantillon: entrepreneur and economist. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Driscoll, G. P., & Rizzo, M. J. (1985). The economics of time and ignorance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Porta, L., Raphael, F. L.-d.-S., & Schleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. Journal of Finance, 57, 265–301.
Potts, J. (2000). The new evolutionary microeconomics: complexity, competence, and adaptive behaviour. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Theory of economic development, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shackle, G. L. S. (1974). Keynesian Kaleidics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Snowdon, B., & Vane, H. R. (1998). Transforming macroeconomics: an interview with Robert E. Lucas Jr. Journal of Economic Methodology, 5, 115–46.
Spengler, J. J. (1954a). Richard Cantillon: first of the moderns I. Journal of Political Economy, 62, 281–95.
Spengler, J. J. (1954b). Richard Cantillon: first of the moderns II. Journal of Political Economy, 62, 406–24.
von Hayek, F. A. (1967). Prices and production. New York: Augustus M. Kelly. 1935.
Wagner, R. E. (2010). Mind, society, and human action: time and knowledge in a theory of social economy. London: Routledge.
Wagner, R. E. (2012a). A macro economy as an ecology of plans. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82, 433–44.
Wagner, R. E. (2012b). Viennese Kaleidics. Review of Austrian Economics, 25, 283–97.
White, L. H. (1999). The theory of monetary institutions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bilo, S., Wagner, R.E. Neutral money: Historical fact or analytical artifact?. Rev Austrian Econ 28, 139–150 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-014-0271-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-014-0271-y
Keywords
- Neutral money
- Cantillon effects
- Non-equilibrium processes
- Kaleidics vs. equilibrium
- Learning by doing
- Credit as commanding height