Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic value of patient-reported symptom interference in patients with late-stage lung cancer

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been found to be significant predictors of clinical outcomes such as overall survival (OS), but the effect of demographic and clinical factors on the prognostic ability of PROs is less understood. Several PROs derived from the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) were investigated for association with OS, with adjustments for other factors, including performance status.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on data from 90 patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Several baseline PROs were added to a base Cox proportional hazards model to examine the marginal significance and improvement in model fit attributable to the PRO: mean MDASI symptom interference level; mean MDASI symptom severity level for five selected symptoms; SF-12 physical and mental component summaries; and the SF-12 general health item. Bootstrap resampling was used to assess the robustness of the findings.

Results

The MDASI mean interference level had a significant effect on OS (p = 0.007) when the model was not adjusted for interactions with other prognostic factors. Further exploration suggested the significance was due to an interaction with performance status (p = 0.001). The MDASI mean symptom severity level and the SF-12 physical component summary, mental component summary, and general health item did not have a significant effect on OS.

Conclusions

Symptom interference adds prognostic information for OS in advanced lung cancer patients with poor performance status, even when demographic and clinical prognostic factors are accounted for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ECOG PS:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status

EORTC:

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer

HR:

Hazard ratio

MDASI:

M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

PRO:

Patient-reported outcome

SF-12:

12-item Short-Form Health Survey

SF-36:

36-item Short-Form Health Survey

References

  1. Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. US Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM071975.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2012.

  3. Basch, E. M., Reeve, B. B., Mitchell, S. A., Clauser, S. B., Minasian, L., Sit, L., et al. (2011). Electronic toxicity monitoring and patient-reported outcomes. Cancer Journal (Sudbury, Mass.), 17(4), 231–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cleeland, C. S., Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Chou, C., Harle, M. T., Morrissey, M., et al. (2000). Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer, 89(7), 1634–1646.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bullinger, M., Crabeels, D., Estapè, J., Filiberti, A., et al. (1991). The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire: Interim results of an international field study. In D. Osoba (Ed.), Effect of cancer on quality of life (pp. 185–203). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ware, J. E, Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ware, J, Jr, Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinten, C., Coens, C., Mauer, M., Comte, S., Sprangers, M. A., Cleeland, C., et al. (2009). Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials. Lancet Oncology, 10(9), 865–871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sloan, J. A., Zhao, X., Novotny, P. J., Wampfler, J., Garces, Y., Clark, M. M., et al. (2012). Relationship between deficits in overall quality of life and non-small-cell lung cancer survival. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(13), 1498–1504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, X. S., Shi, Q., Lu, C., Basch, E. M., Johnson, V. E., Mendoza, T. R., et al. (2010). Prognostic value of symptom burden for overall survival in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer, 116(1), 137–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mauer, M., Bottomley, A., Coens, C., & Gotay, C. (2008). Prognostic factor analysis of health-related quality of life data in cancer: A statistical methodological evaluation. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 8(2), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Armstrong, T. S., Vera-Bolanos, E., Gning, I., Acquaye, A., Gilbert, M. R., Cleeland, C., et al. (2011). The impact of symptom interference using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) on prediction of recurrence in primary brain tumor patients. Cancer, 117(14), 3222–3228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoang, T., Xu, R., Schiller, J. H., Bonomi, P., & Johnson, D. H. (2005). Clinical model to predict survival in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with third-generation chemotherapy regimens based on eastern cooperative oncology group data. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(1), 175–183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ikeda, M., Okada, S., Tokuuye, K., Ueno, H., & Okusaka, T. (2001). Prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma receiving chemo radiotherapy. Cancer, 91(3), 490–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, J. G., Ryoo, B. Y., Park, Y. H., Kim, B. S., Kim, T. Y., Im, Y. H., et al. (2008). Prognostic factors for survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 61(2), 301–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, T. J., Song, S., Kim, C. K., Kim, W. Y., Choi, C. H., Lee, J. H., et al. (2007). Prognostic factors associated with brain metastases from epithelial ovarian carcinoma. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 17(6), 1252–1257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park, S. R., Kook, M. C., Choi, I. J., Kim, C. G., Lee, J. Y., Cho, S. J., et al. (2010). Predictive factors for the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy as salvage therapy in metastatic gastric cancer patients. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 65(3), 579–587.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cleeland, C. S., Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Woodruff, J. F., Palos, G. R., Richman, S. P., et al. (2011). Levels of symptom burden during chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer: Differences between public hospitals and a tertiary cancer center. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(21), 2859–2865.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Lu, C., Palos, G. R., Liao, Z., Mobley, G. M., et al. (2011). Measuring the symptom burden of lung cancer: The validity and utility of the lung cancer module of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Oncologist, 16(2), 217–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sloan, J. A., Aaronson, N., Cappelleri, J. C., Fairclough, D. L., & Varricchio, C. (2002). Assessing the clinical significance of single items relative to summated scores. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(5), 479–487.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harrell, F. E, Jr, Lee, K. L., Califf, R. M., Pryor, D. B., & Rosati, R. A. (1984). Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Statistics in Medicine, 3(2), 143–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. R Documentation. (2012). Compute a concordance measure. http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/survival/html/survConcordance.html. Accessed 31 July 2012.

  25. Burr, D. (1994). A comparison of certain bootstrap confidence intervals in the Cox model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(428), 1290–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sauerbrei, W., & Schumacher, M. (1992). A bootstrap resampling procedure for model building: Application to the Cox regression model. Statistics in Medicine, 11(16), 2093–2109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 23 Aug 2012.

  28. Therneau, T. (2012). A package for survival analysis in S. R package version 2.36-14. The R Project for Statistical Computing. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival//survival.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2012.

  29. R Documentation. (2012). Compute a survival curve from a Cox model. http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/survival/html/survfit.coxph.html. Accessed 31 July 2012.

  30. Altman, D. G., & Andersen, P. K. (1989). Bootstrap investigation of the stability of a Cox regression model. Statistics in Medicine, 8(7), 771–783.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ohman, E. M., Granger, C. B., Harrington, R. A., & Lee, K. L. (2000). Risk stratification and therapeutic decision making in acute coronary syndromes. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(7), 876–878.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Braun, D. P., Gupta, D., & Staren, E. D. (2011). Quality of life assessment as a predictor of survival in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer, 11, 353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Visbal, A. L., Williams, B. A., Nichols, F. C, I. I. I., Marks, R. S., Jett, J. R., Aubry, M. C., et al. (2004). Gender differences in non-small-cell lung cancer survival: An analysis of 4,618 patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2002. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 78(1), 209–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gotay, C. C., Kawamoto, C. T., Bottomley, A., & Efficace, F. (2008). The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(8), 1355–1363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the editorial support of Bryan F. Tutt, MA, ELS, of the Department of Scientific Publications at MD Anderson, and Jeanie F. Woodruff, BS, ELS, of the Department of Symptom Research at MD Anderson. This project was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson’s Cancer Center Support Grant, Award Number CA016672, and by Award Number CA026582 from the National Cancer Institute to Charles Cleeland, PhD. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health..

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tito R. Mendoza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barney, B.J., Wang, X.S., Lu, C. et al. Prognostic value of patient-reported symptom interference in patients with late-stage lung cancer. Qual Life Res 22, 2143–2150 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0356-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0356-2

Keywords

Navigation