Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring acceptance in irritable bowel syndrome: preliminary validation of an adapted scale and construct utility

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It has been well established that how irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients respond to their illness experiences (physical, psychological) has a great impact on their symptoms, psychosocial functioning and quality of life. Recently it has been shown that using acceptance coping strategies (rather than control coping strategies) is linked to positive outcomes in several chronic illness contexts (e.g. chronic pain, diabetes, epilepsy).This study is intended to evaluate the factor structure and other psychometric properties of an acceptance measure adapted for the IBS population (IBSAAQ) and to investigate its possible utility in the prediction of key IBS outcomes.

Methods

A sample of 121 IBS patients attending a specialized gastroenterology clinic completed a series of self-report measures assessing acceptance of IBS, general acceptance, symptom severity, IBS impact on quality of life, general quality of life, gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, avoidant coping behaviours, depression, anxiety and stress.

Results

Factor analysis supported a 2-factor structure explaining 48.5 % of variance. The total scale and its subscales (activity engagement/IBS willingness) were found to have adequate internal consistency (all α’s > 0.80) and test–retest stability. Correlation analyses showed good convergent and concurrent validity. Regression analyses showed that the IBSAAQ and its subscales significantly contributed to the prediction of IBS outcomes.

Conclusion

The IBSAAQ is a valid and reliable measure of acceptance in IBS. This measure might be of use for the study of the impact of coping strategies on outcomes in IBS and of the effectiveness of acceptance-based approaches (e.g. acceptance and commitment therapy).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Chang, L. (2004). Review article: Epidemiology and quality of life in functional gastrointestinal disorders. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 20, 31–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zijdenbos, I. L., de Wit, N. J., van Der Heijden, G.J., Rubin, G., & Quartero, A. O. (2009). Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome. Cochrane Library, Jan (1). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006442.pub2.

  3. Ruiz, F. J. (2010). A review of Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: Correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10(1), 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., & Strosahl, K. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., et al. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The psychological record, 54, 553–578.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., et al. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire—II: A revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance. Behaviour Therapy, 42, 676–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gregg, J. A., Callaghan, G. M., Hayes, S. C., & Glenn-Lawson, J. L. (2007). Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(2), 336–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCracken, L., Vowles, K. E., & Ecclesston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: Component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107, 159–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Longstreth, G. F., Thompson, W. G., Chey, W. D., Houghton, L. A., Mearin, F., & Spiller, R. C. (2006). Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology, 130(5), 1480–1491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spiller, R., Aziz, Q., Creed, F., Emmanuel, A., Houghton, L., Hungin, P., et al. (2007). Guidelines on the irritable bowel syndrome: Mechanisms and practical management. Gut, 56(12), 1770–1798.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferreira, N. (2009). Irritable Bowel Syndrome Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (IBSAAQ). Available from: http://tinyurl.com/3tev2cz.

  12. Francis, C., Morris, J., & Whorwell, P. (1997). The irritable bowel severity scoring system: A simple method of monitoring irritable bowel syndrome and its progress. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 11, 395–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Groll, D., Vanner, S. J., Depew, W. T., Dacosta, L. R., Simon, J. B., Groll, A., et al. (2002). The IBS-36: A new quality of life measure for irritable bowel syndrome. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 97(4), 962–971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt, S., Muhlan, H., & Power, M. (2005). The EUROHIS-QOL 8 item index: Psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. European Journal of Public Health, 16(4), 420–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Labus, J. S., Bolus, R., Chang, L., Wiklund, I., Naesdal, J., Mayer, E. A., et al. (2004). The visceral sensitivity index: Development and validation of a gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety scale. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 20, 89–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reme, S. E., Darnley, S., Kennedy, T., & Chalder, T. (2010). The development of the irritable bowel syndrome-behavioral responses questionnaire. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(3), 319–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vowles, K., McCracken, L. M., McCleod, C., & Eccleston, C. (2008). The chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis and identification of patient subgroups. Pain, 140(2), 284–291.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cho, S., Heiby, E. M., McCracken, L. M., Moon, D.-E., & Lee, J.-H. (2012). Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire in chronic pain patients. Quality of Life Research, 21(6), 1059–1064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) Grant SFRH/BD/35966/2007 awarded to Nuno Bravo Ferreira.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuno Bravo Ferreira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferreira, N.B., Eugenicos, M.P., Morris, P.G. et al. Measuring acceptance in irritable bowel syndrome: preliminary validation of an adapted scale and construct utility. Qual Life Res 22, 1761–1766 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0299-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0299-z

Keywords

Navigation