Erratum to: Qual Life Res DOI 10.1007/s11136-012-0171-1
In the fourth paragraph of the Discussion section (page 9) in the original publication, the word ‘treatment’ should be replaced by ‘HRQoL’ in the following two sentences:
“However, after accounting for response shift, a positive true change contribution indicated that treatment effects may have been underestimated, leading to false-negative results.” should read “However, after accounting for response shift, a positive true change contribution indicated that HRQoL effects may have been underestimated, leading to false-negative results.”
“Assessment of the treatment’s “true” effects must include individuals’ change in perception due to treatment or change in health, especially when using self-report measures in clinical trials.” should read “Assessment of HRQoL’s “true” effects must include individuals’ change in perception due to treatment or change in health, especially when using self-report measures in clinical trials.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0171-1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gandhi, P.K., Ried, L.D., Huang, IC. et al. Erratum to: Assessment of response shift using two structural equation modeling techniques. Qual Life Res 22, 473 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0244-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0244-1