Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of an Extended Version of the SEIQoL-DW in a Cohort of Hodgkin Lymphoma’ Survivors

  • Brief communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individual measures of quality of life (QoL) have been initiated to overcome the possible limitations with standardized measures using predefined domains for evaluation. The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) uses personal interviews to explore the five most important areas in life, both positive and negative, crucial for QoL. The nominated areas are rated regarding satisfaction and weighted to capture the importance of each selected area. The Swedish version has been extended with a disease-specific module, which evaluates the areas in life influenced by disease. The aim of this study was to validate the disease-specific SEIQoL-DW and furthermore, to evaluate the influence of the importance ratings on the overall index score in a cohort of Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. The results support the construct validity of the disease-specific SEIQoL-DW and indicate that the instrument appears to be a sensitive measure with ability to differentiate between groups with disparate subjective health status. The SEIQoL-DW succeeds to capture both positive and negative areas in life influenced by disease. The present study gave no evidence that the weighting procedure has any impact on the total index. The results support the use of the new extended version including a disease-specific module.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HL:

Hodgkin lymphoma

MCS:

mental component summary

SD:

standard deviation

SEIQoL:

The Schedule for the Evaluation of the Individual Quality of Life

SEIQoL-DW:

The Schedule for the Evaluation of the Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting

SF:

Short Form health survey questionnaire

PCS:

physical component summary

QoL:

quality of life

References

  1. AM Hickey G Bury CA O’Boyle et al. (1996) ArticleTitleA new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): Application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS Br Med J 313 29–33 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB1c%2Fls1w%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. JP Browne CA O’Boyle HM McGee et al. (1997) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains Qual Life Res 6 301–309 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018423124390 Occurrence Handle9248312 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA1M7lt1Q%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. CA O’Boyle (1994) ArticleTitleThe schedule for the evaluation of the individual quality of life (SEIQoL) Int J Ment Health 23 IssueID3 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. L Wettergren M Björkholm U Axdorph et al. (2003) ArticleTitleIndividual quality of life in long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma – a comparative study Qual Life Res 12 IssueID5 545–554 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1025024008139 Occurrence Handle13677499 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svjs1Wnsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. L Wettergren M Björkholm U Axdorph et al. (2004) ArticleTitleDeterminants of health-related quality of life in long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma Qual Life Res 13 IssueID8 1369–1379 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:QURE.0000040790.43372.69 Occurrence Handle15503832 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crjtlSntg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J Ware SuffixJr M Kosinski SD Keller (1996) ArticleTitleA 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity Med Care 34 IssueID3 220–233 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 Occurrence Handle8628042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. M Sullivan J Karlsson C Taft (1997) SF-12 Hälsoenkät Svensk manual (SF-12 Health Survey. Swedish Manual) Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  8. T Trauer A Mackinnon (2001) ArticleTitleWhy are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement Qual Life Res 10 IssueID7 579–585 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013159414364 Occurrence Handle11822791 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fptlyhtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. LK Waters D Roach (1971) ArticleTitleComparison of unweighted and importance-weighted job satisfaction measures for three samples of female office workers Psychol Rep 28 IssueID3 779–782

    Google Scholar 

  10. SJ Jansen AM Stiggelbout MA Nooij et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment Qual Life Res 9 IssueID5 541–557 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008917432368 Occurrence Handle11190009 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpvFWntQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Wettergren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wettergren, L., Björkholm, M. & Langius-Eklöf, A. Validation of an Extended Version of the SEIQoL-DW in a Cohort of Hodgkin Lymphoma’ Survivors. Qual Life Res 14, 2329–2333 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8165-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8165-x

Keywords

Navigation