Skip to main content
Log in

A model for deceased-donor transplant queue waiting times

  • Published:
Queueing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many jurisdictions, organ allocation is done on the basis of the health status of the patient, either explicitly or implicitly. This paper presents a self-promoting priority queueing model for patient waiting times which takes into account changes in health status over time. In this model, most patients arrive as “regular” customers to the queue, but as the health of a patient degrades, their status is promoted to “priority” to reflect the increased urgency of the transplant. We model the queueing system as a level-dependent quasi-birth-and-death process, and the steady-state joint queue length distribution as well as the marginal delay distributions for each queue are computed via the use of matrix analytic techniques. The model is calibrated using liver transplantation wait-list data, provided by a regional health centre in Canada, which tracked approximately 1,100 patients over nearly 13 years. Blood-type-specific models are fit and performance measures, such as the mean and distribution of the time until transplant, are obtained and compared to empirical estimates calculated using the raw data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abellán, J.J., Armero, C., Conesa, D., Pérez-Panadés, J., Martínez-Beneito, M.A., Zurriaga, O., García-Blasco, M.J., Vanaclocha, H.: Analysis of the renal transplant waiting list in the País Valencià (Spain). Stat. Med. 25, 345–358 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barone, M., Avolio, A.W., Di Leo, A., Burra, P., Francavilla, A.: ABO blood group-related waiting list disparities in liver transplant candidates: effect of the MELD adoption. Transplantation 85, 844–849 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bazarah, S.M., Peltekian, K.M., McAlister, V.C., Bitter-Suermann, H., MacDonald, A.S.: Utility of MELD and Child–Turcotte–Pugh scores and the Canadian waitlisting algorithm in predicting short-term survival after liver transplant. Clin. Investig. Med. 27, 162–167 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bright, L., Taylor, P.G.: Calculating the equilibrium distribution in level dependent quasi-birth-and-death processes. Stoch. Models 11, 497–525 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Canadian Blood Services. Blood Type Facts. http://www.blood.ca/CentreApps/Internet/UW_V502_MainEngine.nsf/page/Blood+Type+Facts?OpenDocument&CloseMenu. Accessed 27 April 2013

  6. Gaver, D.P., Jacobs, P.A., Latouche, G.: Finite birth-and-death models in randomly changing environments. Adv. Appl. Probab. 16, 715–731 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glander, P., Budde, K., Schmidt, D., Fuller, T.F., Giessing, M., Neumayer, H.-H., Liefeldt, L.: The ‘blood group O problem’ in kidney transplantation: time to change? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 25, 1998–2004 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gómez-Corral, A., Krishnamoorthy, A., Narayanan, V.C.: The impact of self-generation of priorities on multi-server queues with finite capacity. Stoch. Models 21, 427–447 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hussey, J.C., Parameshwar, J., Banner, N.R.: Influence of blood group on mortality and waiting time before heart transplantation in the United Kingdom: implications for equity of access. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 26, 30–33 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalbfleisch, J.D., Prentice, R.L.: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnamoorthy, A., Narayanan, V.C.: On a queueing system with self generation of priorities. In: Srinivasan, S.K., Vijayakumar, A. (eds.) Stochastic Point Processes, pp. 212–217. Narosa Publishing House, Chennai (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krishnamoorthy, A., Narayanan, V.C., Deepak, T.G.: On a queueing system with self generation of priorities. Neural Parallel Sci. Comput. 13, 119–130 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krishnamoorthy, A., Babu, S., Narayanan, V.C.: MAP/(PH/PH)/\(c\) queue with self-generation of priorities and non-preemptive service. Stoch. Anal. Appl. 26, 1250–1266 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnamoorthy, A., Babu, S., Narayanan, V.C.: The MAP/(PH/PH)/1 queue with self-generation of priorities and non-preemptive service. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 195, 174–185 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishnamoorthy, A., Narayanan, V. C., Chakravarthy, S. R.: The impact of priority generations in a multi-priority queueing system: a simulation approach. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (Eds. M.D. Rossetti, R.R. Hill, B. Johansson, A. Dunkin & R.G. Ingalls), IEEE Computer Society, New York, USA, pp. 1622-1633 (2009)

  16. Latouche, G., Ramaswami, V.: Introduction to Matrix Analytic Methods in Stochastic Modeling. ASA SIAM, Philadelphia (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawless, J.F.: Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liefeldt, L., Budde, K., Glander, P.: Accumulation of elderly ESRD patients with blood group O on the waiting list (Letter to editors). Transpl. Int. 24, e83–e84 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maertens, T., Walraevens, J., Bruneel, H.: Performance comparison of several priority schemes with priority jumps. Ann. Oper. Res. 162, 109–125 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinsky, M.A., Karlin, S.: An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling, 4th edn. Academic Press, Boston (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stanford, D.A., Renouf, E.M., McAlister, V.C.: Waiting for liver transplantation in Canada: Waitlist history 2000–04 and sensitivity analysis for the future. Health Care Manag. Sci. 11, 184–195 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stanford, D.A., Lee, J.M., Chandok, N., McAlister, V.C.: A queueing model to address wait time inconsistency in solid-organ transplantation. Oper. Res. Health Care 3, 40–45 (2014)

  23. Su, X., Zenios, S.: Patient choice in kidney allocation: the role of the queueing discipline. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 6, 280–301 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Syski, R.: Passage Times for Markov Chains. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tijms, H.C.: A First Course in Stochastic Models. Wiley, Chichester (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Q.: Modeling and analysis of high risk patient queues. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 155, 502–515 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wiesner, R., Edwards, E., Freeman, R., Harper, A., Kim, R., Kamath, P., et al.: Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology 124, 91–96 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zenios, S.A.: Modeling the transplant waiting list: a queueing model with reneging. Queueing Syst. 31, 239–251 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zenios, S.A., Chertow, G.M., Wein, L.M.: Dynamic allocation of kidneys to candidates on the transplant waiting list. Oper. Res. 48, 549–569 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Associate Editor and the referees for their useful comments and valuable suggestions that helped improve this paper. The authors also wish to thank D. Bellhouse who suggested we consider a competing risks framework for calibrating our model. This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through its Discovery Grants program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Drekic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drekic, S., Stanford, D.A., Woolford, D.G. et al. A model for deceased-donor transplant queue waiting times. Queueing Syst 79, 87–115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-014-9417-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-014-9417-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation