Abstract
Federal and local pressures have given rise to a hybrid organization that brings together disparate groups from the public and non-profit sectors to address complex social problems. This article examines one such organizational emergence of state-affiliated sponsorship. Based on data from a multi-method case study, we find that not only do members of the sponsoring organization use legitimate authority structures, existing laws, and social norms to reproduce their power, they do so with a state mandate that privileges their expertise and processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947–952.
Bensen, L., & Harkavy, I. (2000). Higher education’s third revolution: The emergence of the democratic cosmopolitan civic university. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5, 47–57.
Bok, D. (1992). Reclaiming the public trust. Change, 24, 13–19.
Boyer, E. (1994). Creating the new American college. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 40, A48.
Brager, G., Specht, H., & Torczyner, J. (1987). Community organizing. New York: Columbia University Press.
Brodkin, E., Fuqua, C., & Thoren, K. (2002). Contracting welfare reform: Uncertainties of capacity-building within disjointed federalism. Working paper on the project on the public economy of work. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Chaskin, R. J., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., & Vidal, A. (2001). Building community capacity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Chaves, M., Stephens, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Does government funding suppress nonprofits’ political activity? American Sociological Review, 69, 292–316.
Cisneros, H. (1995). Universities and the urban challenge. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Cobb, P. D., & Rubin, B. A. (2006). Contradictory interests, tangled power and disorganized organization. Administration & Society.
Cox, D. N. (2000). Developing a framework for understanding university-community partnerships. Cityscapes: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5, 9–20.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 82, 147–160.
Edwards, B., & Marullo, S. (1999). Universities in troubled times. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 754–765.
Eisenstein, Z. (1998). Theorizing and politicizing choice in the 1996 elections. In C. Y. H. Lo & M. Schwartz (Eds.), Social Policy and the Conservative Agenda. Oxford: Blackwell.
Feagin, J. R., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). A case for the case study. Chapel Hill: UNC Press.
Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first century capitalist societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gardner, D. (2005). Ten lessons in collaboration. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 10, Manuscript 1. Retrieved 2005 from http://www.nursingworld.org/ojin/topic26/tpc26_1.htm
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hardy, C. (1994). Power and politics in organizations. In C. Hardy (Ed.), Managing strategic action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30, 58–77.
Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (1998). Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science, 9, 217–230.
Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003). Resources, knowledge and influence. The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 321–347.
Himmelman, A. T. (1992). Communities working collaboratively for a change. Minneapolis, MN: The Himmelman Consulting Group.
Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory? Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 411–421.
Holland, B. A. (2001). Characteristics of “engaged institutions” and sustainable partnerships, and effective strategies for change. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.oup.org/researchandpubs/engaged.pdf.
Huxham, C. (1996). On the theory and practice of transformational collaboration: From social service to social justice. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Collaboration and collaborative advantage: Vol. 8. Creating collaborative advantage. London: Sage.
Katz, M. (2001). The price of citizenship. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Lawrence, T., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 281–290.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. New York: Macmillan.
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657–679.
Maurrasse, D. (2001). Beyond the campus. New York: Routledge.
McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society: The community and its counterfeits. New York: Basic Books.
Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nyden, P., Figert, A., Shibley, M., & Burrows, D. (1997). University community collaborative research: Adding chairs at the research table and effective models of collaboration. In P. Nyden, A. Figert, M. Shibley, & D. Burrows (Eds.), Building communities: Social science in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Perrow, C. (2002). Organizing America: Wealth, power, and the origins of corporate capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependency perspective. London: Harper Collins College Division.
Phillips, N. (1997). Bringing the organization back in: A comment on conceptualizations of power in upward influence research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 43–47.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145.
Rothschild, J., & Whitt, J. A. (1986). Cooperative workplace. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rubin, V. (2000). Evaluating university-community partnerships: An examination of the evolution of questions and approaches. Cityscapes: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5, 219–230.
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Salamon, L. M. (2002). The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit America. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of the nonprofit sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Sandmann, L., & Baker-Clark, C. (1997). Characteristics and principles of university-community partnerships: A Delphi study. Proceedings of the 16th Midwest Research to Practice in Adult, Continuing and Community Education. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
Selznick, P. (1966). TVA and the grassroots. New York: Harper Torchbook Edition.
Shefner, J. (1999). Sponsors and the urban poor: Resources or restrictions. Social Problems, 46, 376–397.
Shefner, J., & Cobb, D. (2002). Hierarchy and partnership in New Orleans. Qualitative Sociology, 25, 273–297.
Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
Trist, E. (1993). Introduction to volume II. In E. Trist & H. Murray (Eds.), The Social Engagement of social science: A Tavistock Anthology, volume II: The Socio-Technical Perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Weber, M. (1964). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Zylan, Y., & Soule, S. A. (2000). Ending welfare as we know it again: Welfare state retrenchment, 1989–1995. Social Forces, 792, 623–652.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely appreciate the assistance of the editor of Qualitative Sociology and anonymous reviewers who offered helpful insights that improved this paper. This material is based upon work while the third author, Beth A. Rubin, was serving at the National Science Foundation. Any opinion, findings and conclusions expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Any errors that remain are the sole responsibility of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Parts of this paper were prepared while the third author, Beth A. Rubin, was on leave to serve as Director, Sociology Program, National Science Foundation. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.
P. Denise Cobb is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice Studies at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. This research reflects one part of Cobb's dissertation research that addresses how organizational actors from unequal social positions define a collective agenda and whose interests prevail when there is a lack of consensus. Her current research further examines the emergence of the university-community partnership form. She has published related work in Administration & Society and previously in Qualitative Sociology.
Jon Shefner is Associate Professor of Sociology and Director of the Global Studies Interdisciplinary Program at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville. He is co-editor, with Patricia Fernandez-Kelly, of Out of the Shadows: Political Action and the Informal Economy in Latin America (2006: Pennsylvania State Press). He is currently working on a book examining the impact of globalization and democratization on the mobilization and well being of Mexico's urban poor.
Beth A. Rubin is Professor of Management and Adjunct Professor of Sociology at University of North Carolina-Charlotte. Rubin publishes on economic and workplace transformation, labor unions, homelessness and social policy and social theory in leading academic journals. Her current research is on organizational commitment in the context of the new economy, inequality and industrial restructuring, organizational and workplace restructuring and time in organizations, the latter of which is represented in the forthcoming book, Research in the Sociology of Work: Workplace Temporalities, that Rubin is editing.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cobb, P.D., Shefner, J. & Rubin, B.A. Sponsored Social Change in a Public Housing Project. Qual Sociol 29, 211–231 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9019-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9019-8