Abstract
In this paper, the genuine multipartite entanglement (GME) and quantum criticality property of spin systems with staggered Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (DM) interaction are investigated by exploiting quantum renormalization group method. The results show that the GME can indicate quantum phase transitions at critical points after several iterations of the renormalization. Moreover, the DM interaction effectively restores the spoiled GME via creation of quantum fluctuations, while it also changes the critical points. At last, the nonanalytic and scaling behaviors of GME are analyzed in detail.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goldenfeld, N.: Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group Addison. Wesley, New York (1992)
Osterloh, A., Amico, L., Falci, G., Fazio, R.: Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition. Nature 416, 608 (2002)
Vidal, J., Palacios, G., Mosseri, R.: Entanglement in a second-order quantum phase transition. Phys. Rev. A 69, 022107 (2004)
Vidal, G., Latorre, J.I., Rico, E., Kitaev, A.: Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003)
Lambert, N., Emary, C., Brandes, T.: Entanglement and the phase transition in single-mode superradiance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 073602 (2004)
Sachdev, S.: Quantum Phase Transitions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
de Oliveira, T.R., Rigolin, G., de Oliveira, M.C., Miranda, E.: Multipartite entanglement signature of quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 170401 (2006)
Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Jafari, R., Kargarian, M., Langari, A., Siahatgar, M.: Phase diagram and entanglement of the Ising model with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 78, 214414 (2008)
Amico, L., Osterloh, A., Plastina, F., Fazio, R., Palma, G.M.: Dynamics of entanglement in one-dimensional spin systems. Phys. Rev. A 69, 022304 (2004)
Hu, T.T., Xue, K., Sun, C.F.: Quantum teleportation and dense coding via topological basis. Quantum Inf. Process. 12, 3369–3381 (2013)
de Oliveira, T.R., Rigolin, G., de Oliveira, M.C., Miranda, E.: Symmetry-breaking effects upon bipartite and multipartite entanglement in the XY model. Phys. Rev. A 77, 032325 (2008)
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., Vedral, V.: Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)
Werlang, T., Trippe, C., Ribeiro, G.A.P., Rigolin, G.: Quantum correlations in spin chains at finite temperatures and quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 095702 (2010)
Werlang, T., Ribeiro, G.A.P., Rigolin, G.: Spotlighting quantum critical points via quantum correlations at finite temperatures. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062334 (2011)
Li, Y.C., Lin, H.Q.: Thermal quantum and classical correlations and entanglement in the XY spin model with three-spin interaction. Phys. Rev. A 83, 052323 (2011)
Sun, W.Y., Shi, J.D., Wang, D., Ye, L.: Exploring the global entanglement and quantum phase transition in the spin 1/2 XXZ model with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Quantum Inf. Process. 15, 245–253 (2016)
Cheng, W.W., Liu, J.M.: Fidelity susceptibility approach to quantum phase transitions in the XY spin chain with multisite interactions. Phys. Rev. A 82, 012308 (2010)
Justino, L., de Oliveira, T.R.: Bell inequalities and entanglement at quantum phase transitions in the XXZ model. Phys. Rev. A 85, 052128 (2012)
Mandel, O., Greiner, M., Widera, A., Rom, T., Hansch, T.W., Bloch, I.: Controlled collisions for multi-particle entanglement of optically trapped atoms. Nature 425, 937 (2003)
Roos, C.F., et al.: Control and measurement of three-qubit entangled states. Science 304, 1478 (2004)
de Oliveira, T.R., Rigolin, G., de Oliveira, M.C., Miranda, E.: Genuine multipartite entanglement in quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rev. A 73, 010305(R) (2008)
Carvahlo, A.R.R., Mintert, F., Buchleitner, A.: Decoherence and multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230501 (2004)
Mintert, F., Kuś, M., Buchleitner, A.: Concurrence of mixed multipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260502 (2005)
Li, M., Fei, S.M., Wang, Z.X.: A lower bound of concurrence for multipartite quantum states. J. Phys. A 42, 145303 (2009)
Langari, A.: Phase diagram of the antiferromagnetic XXZ model in the presence of an external magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 58, 14467 (1998)
Jafari, R., Langari, A.: Phase diagram of the one-dimensional \(S=1/2\) XXZ model with ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor and antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interactions. Phys. Rev. B 76, 014412 (2007)
Verstraete, F., et al.: Renormalization-group transformations on quantum states phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 140601 (2005)
Ma, F.W., Liu, S.X., Kong, X.M.: Entanglement and quantum phase transition in the one-dimensional anisotropic XY model. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062309 (2008)
Liu, C.C., Shi, J.D., Ding, Z.Y., Ye, L.: Exploring the renormalization of quantum discord and Bell non-locality in the one-dimensional transverse Ising model. Quantum Inf. Process. 15, 3209–3221 (2016)
Song, X.K., Wu, T., Ye, L.: Quantum correlations and quantum phase transition in the Ising model with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Phys. A 394, 386 (2014)
Kargarian, M., Jafari, R., Langari, A.: Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and anisotropy effects on the entanglement of the Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. A 79, 042319 (2009)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China under Grants Nos. 61275119, 11575001, and 11247256 and also by the fund of Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 1508085QF139).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
In this appendix, we will describe the renormalization of spin models by exploiting QRG method in detail. Followed, we will take the renormalization of one-dimensional Ising model as an example.
The Hamiltonian of Ising model with staggered DM interaction in the z direction on a periodic chain of N sites is
By using the Kadanoff’s block method, it is necessary to divide the initial system Hamiltonian shown in Eq. (8) into two parts, namely,
where \(H^\mathrm{B}\) is block Hamiltonian and \(H^\mathrm{BB}\) is interblock Hamiltonian. To get a renormalized form for the Hamiltonian, we will choose three sites as a block and the decomposition has been shown in Fig. 7. Note that it is a guarantee of self-similarity after each QRG step.
Then, the specific forms of Hamiltonian \(H^\mathrm{B}\) and \(H^\mathrm{BB}\) are
where \(\sigma _{L,j}^\alpha \) refers to the \(\alpha \) component of the Pauli matrix at site j of the \(L\hbox {th}\) block Hamiltonian. The exact treatment of this Hamiltonian leads to two distinct eigenvalues which are doubly degenerate with \(\left| \uparrow \right\rangle \) and \(\left| \downarrow \right\rangle \) defined as the eigenstates of the Pauli matrix \(\sigma ^{z}\), both degenerate ground states used to construct the projection operator \(P_0 \) for the renormalized subspace are given by
where \(q=\sqrt{1+8D^{2}}\). The energy corresponding to the ground states is
To eliminate the higher energy of the system and retain the lower, the projection operator \(P_0 \) is composed of its lowest-energy eigenstates. Then, the effective Hamiltonian \(H^\mathrm{eff}\) and original Hamiltonian H have in common the low-lying spectrum, which can be given by the projection operator, i.e., \(H^\mathrm{eff}=P_0^\dagger HP_0 \) wherein \(P_0^\dagger \) is the Hermitian operator of \(P_0 \). In the effective Hamiltonian, we consider only the first-order correction in the perturbation theory, which is
At the same time, the projection operator \(P_0 \) can be put in a factorized form
where the specific form of \(P_0^L \) is
where \(\left| \Uparrow \right\rangle _L \) and \(\left| \Downarrow \right\rangle _L \) are the renamed states of the \(L\hbox {th}\) block to represent the effective site degrees of freedom. Then, the Pauli matrices in the effective Hilbert space have the following transformations:
Then, we can obtain the effective Hamiltonian of renormalized Ising model, which is similar to the initial one with the sign of DM interaction changed.
Similarly, to renormalize the one-dimensional anisotropic XXZ model, we still choose three sites as a block. The block Hamiltonian has two degenerate ground states as follows
with \(q=\sqrt{\Delta ^{2}+8\left( {D^{2}+1} \right) }\). Using the similar processing implemented in the Ising model, we can also achieve the renormalization of XXZ model.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, Jd., Wang, D. & Ye, L. Genuine multipartite entanglement as the indicator of quantum phase transition in spin systems. Quantum Inf Process 15, 4629–4640 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-016-1422-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-016-1422-9